Why is everybody so worried about carbon? If your company is emitting soot, graphite and diamonds, I can't see what the problem is. No... carbon and carbon dioxide are not the same thing.
The phrase "carbon neutral" is such a handy bit of greenwashing. Basically, you manufacture millions devices at a massive carbon cost, plant a bunch of trees or invest in wind farms, and act like nothing happened.Meanwhile
![]()
I don't think it's all or nothing. They could make products more easily repairable and upgradable and that would extend their usable lifecycles. But once you start gluing things together, soldering in RAM and quite purposefully neglecting to put a microSD slot into your iPhones, you're just creating planned obsolescence.If Apple truly wanted to be environment friendly they should pause their annual release of their products..not removing chargers so that they can force you to buy magsafe or usb-a power bricks...
Meanwhile
![]()
How often do you buy a new iPhone?
Do Apple's "ethical" concerns extend to the forced/slave labor the Chinese use? Do their concerns extend to the lack of diversity Apple has in their executive board?Amazing all this vitriol for one of the best companies on environmental and ethical concerns. Of course, they are not perfect, but their efforts to care and effect positive change are top-tier. If Apple suddenly became the low bar with every other company beating them, we might actually have a clean, sustainable environment, and decent working conditions for employees.
BTW: Who was clamoring for all this outsourcing in the 80's and 90's? I was against it then for the simple reason that environmental, safety, working conditions, pay and retirement were not addressed to even a minimum international standard.
How about those AirPods once the batteries give out? (And can't be replaced). Not too environmentally friendly, are they?Please, don't be dumb.🤨 Removing the power adaptet IS environmet friendly. Just think a for a moment (especially in long term).
I would actually be ok with everyone moving to a 2 year release cycle. It will never happen but it would make sense to consumers.If Apple truly wanted to be environment friendly they should pause their annual release of their products..not removing chargers so that they can force you to buy magsafe or usb-a power bricks...
What would that accomplish. People don't stop buying iPhones after its release, they buy them all year long. I guess by your logic, they should cancel Christmas as there's a spike in iPhone sales during that time as well. Idiot haters.I would actually be ok with everyone moving to a 2 year release cycle. It will never happen but it would make sense to consumers.
Why is everybody so worried about carbon? If your company is emitting soot, graphite and diamonds, I can't see what the problem is.
The purpose of the air quality study was to determine whether there has been a production increase attributable to the iPhone 12 models, not to establish some sort of casual link between manufacturing and harm to the environment.
Yeah, and so is going to a system where new iPhones are released every 2 years. You would see more noticeable gains in hardware and they could stick to software upgrades annually. Now, just think for a moment what that would do for the environment...short term AND long term.Please, don't be dumb.🤨 Removing the power adaptet IS environmet friendly. Just think a for a moment (especially in long term).
The environmental savings from the charger not being in the box is that they can now fit twice as many iPhones in a shipping container, or on a plane. That means half the pollution for shipping, which when they ship millions of devices a year, is a lot less pollution. This also saves Apple a lot in shipping, its ok to have 2 reasons to do something, environment and more profits.Not really, no. People are now looking to buy MagSafe chargers. So Apple is going to make money on chargers, and leave the ones that people already have redundant - the chargers that were in use before MagSafe. And chargers are not something that are just lying around uselessly, at least where I am from. Every single charger and EarPods in my house is in active use, and there is no redundancy and no boxful anywhere. Apple removing chargers and EarPods is more a commentary on the people that buy their devices and on Apple's greed, not about Apple saving the planet.
Nope, the increased air pollution is causing people to buy iPhone 12s.Isn’t the title confusing. Shouldn’t it be the other way around.
You’re calling for the end of capitalism, which I agree with, but good look getting quarterly bloodsuckers to approve a change in a business that is essentially printing money at this pointYeah, and so is going to a system where new iPhones are released every 2 years. You would see more noticeable gains in hardware and they could stick to software upgrades annually. Now, just think for a moment what that would do for the environment...short term AND long term.
And let's not stop there. Cars, TVs, refrigerators. Imagine if money wasn't poured into R&D, but spent on improving the products' software and/or firmware. /sYeah, and so is going to a system where new iPhones are released every 2 years. You would see more noticeable gains in hardware and they could stick to software upgrades annually. Now, just think for a moment what that would do for the environment...short term AND long term.
You agree with an end to capitalism? That is pretty rich for someone who posts as often as you do about everything from the latest/greatest iPhone to luxury cars.You’re calling for the end of capitalism, which I agree with, but good look getting quarterly bloodsuckers to approve a change in a business that is essentially printing money at this point