Battery life will be even worse.put out an iphone 12 mini pro with all the same features as the pro max (except battery life of course) and i'll buy it.
Battery life will be even worse.put out an iphone 12 mini pro with all the same features as the pro max (except battery life of course) and i'll buy it.
battery life isn't an issue for me.Battery life will be even worse.
Where is the deficiency with the regular iPhones versus the Pro models with respect to build quality? Both have the same basic design and glass fronts and backs. The only significant difference between them is a stainless steel band versus an aluminum band and preference there is really a matter of taste rather than build quality.
Trying both at Best Buy I could feel the glass bend with some modest pressure on the 12 while the Pro didn't seem to move. I can feel it on my mini as well, but it's less pronounced than the 12. Comparing with my SO 12 Pro, again I can barely move it. Maybe that's not called build quality, but there is a noticeable difference.What’s “lesser” about the build quality (note that quality is not materials) on the 12 vs the Pro? Honest question because I’ve never seen a poorly made iPhone before.
The phone is pricey though
Based on Apple’s pricing a Pro mini would be $899. But what would you get for $200 more versus the regular mini? The Pro colors? Maybe ProRaw? The market for that would be even smaller than for the market for the existing mini. And the ‘prestige’ folks you’re taking about are buying the Pro and Pro Max anyway, so the effect for Apple is that they cannibalize the sales of their larger, pricier models for no real reason. Doesn’t make financial sense.True that. My suggestion is more along the lines of making it a prestige model, it doesn't have to have ALL the features, just as the 12 Pro doesn't have ALL the features of the 12 Pro Max, but it can have some of them, and especially the exclusive colours.
"Tiny" display.This was a surprise to nobody except die hard mini fanboys.
You've got an iPhone priced at $699 clearly intended to hit a certain price point while claiming 5G. The overwhelming majority of users simply don't want a tiny 5.4" display.
Keep in mind this sales data is already favorable to the mini because the data is derived from U.S. sales only. In China, the mini is a complete joke.
I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. I was between the 12 Pro and the 12 mini, and despite wanting the stainless steel frame and telephoto lens, I went with the 12 mini because the size and weight of the 12 Pro are simply too big.And the ‘prestige’ folks you’re taking about are buying the Pro and Pro Max anyway, so the effect for Apple is that they cannibalize the sales of their larger, pricier models for no real reason. Doesn’t make financial sense.
You’re including more differences than would likely exist in a hypothetical Pro mini. And why would it get a telephoto rather than the ultra-wide?I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. I was between the 12 Pro and the 12 mini, and despite wanting the stainless steel frame and telephoto lens, I went with the 12 mini because the size and weight of the 12 Pro are simply too big.
Apple lost money on an up sell. Had they offered a 12 mini in stainless steel with the telephoto lens instead of the ultrawide, I’d have gladly paid the 12 Pro Max price for that.
"Tiny" display.
I upgraded from a 1st gen SE and the screen feels humongous to me. I can barely reach both edges of the screen with my thumb. And the screen is almost the same size as previous Plus size iPhones. It's anything but tiny.
That’s only two changes: the same build materials as the Pro models and the lens that comes with the Pro models.You’re including more differences than would likely exist in a hypothetical Pro mini. And why would it get a telephoto rather than the ultra-wide?
But you’d be missing the ultra-wide so it’s still inferior to the Pros.That’s only two changes: the same build materials as the Pro models and the lens that comes with the Pro models.
What other difference wouldn’t be included in a Pro mini? Take out one of those and it’s hardly any different at all.
Apple making an iPhone thicker? ... that' a good one, made me chucklecamera module is obviously thicker. body can be thicker with respect to the camera module which means you can include a shorter but thicker battery to make room for the bigger sensor.
Your comment made me laugh. How about doing some research?Apple making an iPhone thicker? ... that' a good one, made me chuckle![]()
My wife and daughter do. My best friend does. Both my parents as well. I know eight people personally who have and love the Mini.I knew it! It used to be so fashionable to go around tirelessly complaining that Apple needs to make smaller phones, but this proves it — nobody actually wants that.
Given all the Memoji focus and the fact that most kids and many parents seem to live on their phones, it isn't surprising that Apple continues to cater to the brick people. That is paying off for Apple.This proves that Apple customer base is 80% trend-following teens who don't know how to choose what they need (I mean currently, obviously their customer base was far more intelligent and smart a couple of decades ago).
No its not because I say so, the sales numbers says so.better value is completely relative. What is considered a better value to me doesn’t mean it’s the same for you and sales numbers do not dictate “better value”. Subjectivity does.
Those sales numbers don’t indicate need. They indicate want.The answer yes, as 94% of iPhone 12 buyers have indicatedI've bought the largest size available since the 6S Plus and have zero reason to downsize (price aside). I do see reasons for the 12 mini to exist, and for those who love that form factor I hope Apple continues to release one.
You’re paying for service. The phone is free. And if you have T-Mobile you’re paying less for that service.You're paying for that phone one way or another.