will try to hold onto my 8 for one more year. still working well.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 13 Camera Comparison: If You Have an Older iPhone, It's Time to Upgrade
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Your first photo has a diffraction spike, while second photo has a lens flare. The first phenomena is caused by photons behaving like waves, which creates specific 'patterns' of light as those waves interact constructively in space. Those 'sun spikes' you get on the first picture, roughly symmetric in all directions, are the expected diffraction pattern of a clean, working-as-intended lens.
You can test the effect in the article's iPhone 11 quite easily. Take a finger, rub it on an oily area of your skin (tip of nose, cheekbones...) and then drag your finger across the lens frontal element on an iPhone camera, edge-to-edge, and on a single direction. If you swept your finger horizontally across the lens, you'll see vertical diffraction lines when pointing your camera to a high-power point-light source (like the sun, or a bright lightbulb far away). Those diffraction lines you see are not expected, and an unequivocal sign that your lens is dirty or scratched.
However, the effect on your second photo is just a regular lens flare caused by sun rays reflecting on the surface of one lens element, then bouncing back on the back-facing surface of another lens element, an then back into the sensor (there can be several reflections). It's a more macroscopic effect than diffraction, and doesn't mean your lens is dirty! You expect some amount of lens flares in all lenses, regardless of how clean they are. It's caused by the geometrical design of the lens, not by how clean it is. The only way to reduce the amount of lens flare is by adding a coating step on the manufacturing process of the lens, where lens elements are coated with very low-reflectivity materials, so there's no bouncing of light rays inside the lens and therefore no lens flare appears.
the reality is that even iphone 3's camera is good enough for most people. all these new features and manufacturing processes for new cameras are nothing more than gimmicks to sell a device which hasn't evolved in a long time.
No way. It's the compromised iPhone 11's that the MR folks have that resulted in such a useless "comparison". The iP11 is definitely better.
My 11 pro always seems to look like the lens is dirty. Streaks of lens flare and light washing across the image. Holding my hand like a lens hood helps a lot. I thought it was me, but it seems like this could be an limitation of the lens setup.
Regardless of this, the 11 still has a great camera.
Regardless of this, the 11 still has a great camera.
The update says the lens on the 11 isn’t dirty or the like but the effect you see on the lights in the final image at night are a dead giveaway something is off. I’m surprised they didn’t catch this sooner. All you’d have to do is bring in another 11 for comparison and then swap them out and redo the test.
For someone with the money to upgrade and the desire to upgrade, it’s OK to upgrade.
The camera, especially on the standard Pro model, is reason enough to upgrade from any previous iPhone model.
The “telephoto” lens, which was telephoto in name only, is now a true short long lens on both the standard and Max versions.
There’s a (limited) macro mode. And improved low light mode.
The computing speed is improved, too.
On the fly, the camera will keep skin tones looking like skin tones, while pumping up (if desired) the overall color in a photo.
Aka in all, those are worthy additions that any fan of the iPhone as a camera would want to have.
The camera, especially on the standard Pro model, is reason enough to upgrade from any previous iPhone model.
The “telephoto” lens, which was telephoto in name only, is now a true short long lens on both the standard and Max versions.
There’s a (limited) macro mode. And improved low light mode.
The computing speed is improved, too.
On the fly, the camera will keep skin tones looking like skin tones, while pumping up (if desired) the overall color in a photo.
Aka in all, those are worthy additions that any fan of the iPhone as a camera would want to have.
Ok people time to clean the camera lenses or downgrade to the iPhone 8
I want to see these camera tests capture movement - kids playing soccer or in a hockey arena? Until they match my SLR they won’t capture my kids’ moments in action.
Pitching for Apple? Really? That's quite an allegation. Who's pitching for Apple?
I've used a variety of so-called "real cameras," all the way from an Arca-Swiss 4x5 F Field to various (d)SLRs to various iPhones. Currently I use an iPhone 12 Pro exclusively; an outstanding "real camera," that allows me to make real photographs.
Last edited:
What a joke of a test - there's no way a normal iPhone 11 produces images that poorly.
So what happened to make it "a joke of a test?"
Please do read the sometimes lengthy explanations in this very thread, they explain the faults thoroughly. And as an iPhone 11 shooter I can also state that the iPhone 11 (or the iPhone 11 Pro, which has exactly the same UW and wide cameras) is WAY better than in this "test".
All anyone needs to do is go back and look at the initial reviews and photos when the iPhone 11 launched. There are threads buried on this site and many others that show great photos in different lighting conditions which basically rebuke this "review".
Dan and MacRumors in general haven't established any credibility for product reviews so I'm surprised many here spend any time debating the quality of any of their reviews. MacRumors is a great site that basically consolidates content created by others and monetizes it. Product reviews is something they expanded into but are not known for. I doubt many come here for reviews and this latest review reveals why you shouldn't.
Dan and MacRumors in general haven't established any credibility for product reviews so I'm surprised many here spend any time debating the quality of any of their reviews. MacRumors is a great site that basically consolidates content created by others and monetizes it. Product reviews is something they expanded into but are not known for. I doubt many come here for reviews and this latest review reveals why you shouldn't.
Makes you wonder why they even fooled with a camera review/comparison. Stick to the rumors.
They are trying to find new ways to make additional money and create exclusive/original content.
Another shoddy macrumors article, taking pictures with a dirty lens
I am not sure if you are being serious or not. If you are, then that photo would not cause a lens flare from any system. If you are just kidding around then you suckered me in
Maybe it is a MFG issue where they come that way off the production line or a MFG issue that causes a problem over time. But I have personal experience from using my wife's phone vs my phone that shows the results that were shown in this article vs better shots that people are saying they get personally. I thought maybe it was just my photography hobby knowledge and intuition but now I am leaning towards some of the phones just having a true MFG issue.
Worth it for the battery alone! Camera is nice though and my wife enjoys the upgrade over her XS max