Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
According to Mashable, Recording in Apple ProRes requires at least 256 GB of storage.
 
LOL - folks - obviously they have their programming together that doesn't require massive amounts of RAM like Androids do. So - this really is a non-starter.

Would we have liked the current flagship to have more and bigger and better across the board? sure - but my 12 Pro Max is super fast and I love it. I am sure my 13 Pro Max is going to be just as good with that 120 Hz and better cameras. Go get an Android if it hurts that much.
 
Guess I can save some money and not buy the 1TB variant. I'm touching up against 512GB now on my 11 Pro but I can make 512 work another year. I assumed it'd be 8GB on the top model following iPad Pro logic.
 
I was pretty underwhelmed in general by this launch. I will still buy one because I buy the flagship iPhone every year and they're giving me $790 trade-in for my 12 Pro Max, but I can't help but think that Apple just did the bare minimum this year. From the iPhones to the Watch, they just made a few small tweaks and that was it. Nothing headlining.

Maybe the cameras will turn out to be way better, despite what the hardware specs would seem to tell us and the 120 hz refresh was nice (and overdue), but if I wasn't already in the habit of upgrading every year, I'm not sure I'd bother this year.

This isn't just an Apple issue either. Samsung is guilty of the same thing. Phones are just getting boring.
 
AnandTech is not expecting any significant increases in performance with the A15. Whether that is just a focus on efficiency or Apple hitting a wall remains to be seen.
From what I've heard the CPU performance is expected to be roughly comparable, but it should come with a decent boost in graphics performance, especially in the Pro devices.
 
I was sitting on the fence until doing a Deep Dive into the image sensor specs.

The Back Wide Camera image sensor in the two Pro models has Game Changer potential !

ONLY thing I don't really like is being forced to buy a 256GB or bigger model to get 4K ProRes video recording support :(

There's NO technical justification for that !

But, it is what it is.

So, for me, it's $1,199 USD for the 13 Pro Max in Sierra Blue.

Love everything about it, except ... the Price ! :(

Transitioning from an 11 Pro Max with 4 GB of DRAM, so the 2 GB of extra DRAM could make a BIG difference with High-Performance Camera Apps.
 
Keeping the same ram is a good thing. This means future iOS versions won’t make apps reload because of different ram requirements like we experience with older devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatlardo
Doesn’t need more than that for a single-tasking OS. Can’t even put an in-game update, like Genshin Impact, in the background without the update stopping so have stare at it in the foreground until it completes.
Really - about the only thing they need is to control the thermals as 11/12 models would throttle down and lower the screen brightness after playing heavy duty games
 
Same 5 nm process this year as last. A15 similar performance to A14. This is not a coincidence. "Designing" is not as important as the manufacturing process.
Apple Silicon "magic" comes from TSMC, not Apple's chip team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
The 13 series is a refinement on the 12 series. Nothing wrong with that. At least the 13 series will put an end to the endless "my iPhone 12 battery life is crap" threads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agsystems
Oh!, gods of Hades, please, help to explain to this humble unfaithful, from all the experts in your lares, what the material difference is, between 6, 7. 8 or whatever. The efficiency of the electronics for such a task, And I promise that the libations to Zeus would be plenty
 
I think people forget that memory management on iPhone tend to be a lot more efficient than on Android phones. There's a reason why flagship Android phones need 12 to 16 GB of RAM, due to the way Android does "memory cleanup."
 
iPhone 13 models feature a more power efficient A15 Bionic chip based on TSMC's advanced 5nm+ process, but Apple has not indicated how much faster the chip is compared to the A14 chip.
Because it wasn't noteworthy.
 
Same 5 nm process this year as last. A15 similar performance to A14. This is not a coincidence. "Designing" is not as important as the manufacturing process.
Apple Silicon "magic" comes from TSMC, not Apple's chip team.

Better off waiting until next year if you want the tick (3nm) in the tock plus design overhaul.
 
ONLY thing I don't really like is being forced to buy a 256GB or bigger model to get 4K ProRes video recording support :(

There's NO technical justification for that !

maybe the 256GB SSD has a faster write speed to enable the footage to be captured. Higher capacity SSDs tend to perform better
 
  • Like
Reactions: Black.Infinity
I think people forget that memory management on iPhone tend to be a lot more efficient than on Android phones. There's a reason why flagship Android phones need 12 to 16 GB of RAM, due to the way Android does "memory cleanup."

I think they only do this for spec sheet boasting, not because the phones actually need it. It's iPhones that slow down over time with updates, not Android.

Better off waiting until next year if you want the tick (3nm) in the tock plus design overhaul.
Indeed, but hopefully this should be more proof that Apple's chip division exists mostly for PR and giving their fanbase euphoric nerdgasms whenever they throw out the word "design". They're given a lot of undue credit for the performance of iPhone chips when it was really TSMC doing all of the heavy-lifting.
Just giving credit where credit is due.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.