Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm a photographer yeah. Not expert on lenses by any means. But I know how a cheap reflex lens full open performs. Not sharply.

I think the biggest issue for 13 Pro is the AI/software that tries working it’s best for the photo situations.
As you stated above close ups are showing the issue more. The software seems to combine lenses to get the photos. You can’t choose only the 0,5x and get the same result as the cameras auto-macro mode.
I don’t think it’s the hardware for these issues.
 
I think the biggest issue for 13 Pro is the AI/software that tries working it’s best for the photo situations.
As you stated above close ups are showing the issue more. The software seems to combine lenses to get the photos. You can’t choose only the 0,5x and get the same result as the cameras auto-macro mode.
I don’t think it’s the hardware for these issues.
I'm not sure it combines cameras. The auto macro mode just sets the 0,5x lens with some digital zoom. Try it. Of course it's best to switch to 0,5x beforehand and go closer. But I think my previous example is taken with a single camera. The result I see by shooting RAW in Halide is the same as the resulting photo. I think it's just poor optical performance, sharpness wise. The upside is low light photography, where you can really see the advantage of a fast lens and bigger sensor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iphone27s
It’s hard to know if I got a lemon 13, took these shots yesterday —
 

Attachments

  • B1153469-B239-4075-90E2-4D30F3EB1854.jpeg
    B1153469-B239-4075-90E2-4D30F3EB1854.jpeg
    574.6 KB · Views: 156
  • 8805F0BC-9637-49A1-90BF-DF377AFC44F1.jpeg
    8805F0BC-9637-49A1-90BF-DF377AFC44F1.jpeg
    332.3 KB · Views: 161
It’s hard to know if I got a lemon 13, took these shots yesterday —
Can you try shooting something with text? Like a remote control, or a cereal box, around 50cm or 2 feet distance
 
  • Like
Reactions: kp98077
Do a video where you pan from one side to the other and compare your old and new phone. You'll notice the image is very choppy. I'm having the same issues with the 13 pro max vs the 12 pro max.

I took photos with the 12 pro max and 13 pro max side by side and the blurry one zoomed is the 13 pro max...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8271 2.jpg
    IMG_8271 2.jpg
    192.5 KB · Views: 153
  • IMG_0909 2.jpg
    IMG_0909 2.jpg
    217.2 KB · Views: 146
I'm not sure it combines cameras.

You’re probably right. It’s the live feature that might be messing with my gallery. It just looks like pictures have more information for a second when swiping between them.
The pictures also seem to “flatten” the focus distance when I compare with my old 11.
It seems to be some mixed experiences with the 13 Pro cameras. At least I have.
 
Imho, this stuff is really not possible to evaluate without looking at 100% pixel level raw samples. I'm not sure useful conclusions can be drawn from resized/compressed shots.
In the above example, there are elements of the photo that don't really seem less sharp on the 13, the wire running through the dirt for instance, and some of the twigs in the relative foreground. The primary detail loss seems to be in the fields of texture...but this seems situational and dependent on the particular photo. I really think the softness is due to something computational rather than optics. It's some AI decision baked into the raw. I could be totally wrong, but that's my guess. I'm no expert, but I've been shooting ILC cameras for 15 years or so.
 
Last edited:
Imho, this stuff is really not possible to evaluate without looking at 100% pixel level raw samples. I'm not sure useful conclusions can be drawn from resized/compressed shots.

Resized to 4K with a professional software and then canvas cut.



The Android version has more detail and is sharper.

the iPhone 13 is actually a 9MP photo because the sensor is 4:3 while the Android one is native 12MP but a +30% is not enough to explain all these differences
 
Imho, this stuff is really not possible to evaluate without looking at 100% pixel level raw samples. I'm not sure useful conclusions can be drawn from resized/compressed shots.
In the above example, there are elements of the photo that don't really seem less sharp on the 13, the wire running through the dirt for instance, and some of the twigs in the relative foreground. The primary detail loss seems to be in the fields of texture...but this seems situational and dependent on the particular photo. I really think the softness is due to something computational rather than optics. It's some AI decision baked into the raw. I could be totally wrong, but that's my guess. I'm no expert, but I've been shooting ILC cameras for 15 years or so.
I did extensively look at 300% RAW samples on my iMac and I can confirm the 13 is blurrier
 
Imho, this stuff is really not possible to evaluate without looking at 100% pixel level raw samples. I'm not sure useful conclusions can be drawn from resized/compressed shots.
In the above example, there are elements of the photo that don't really seem less sharp on the 13, the wire running through the dirt for instance, and some of the twigs in the relative foreground. The primary detail loss seems to be in the fields of texture...but this seems situational and dependent on the particular photo. I really think the softness is due to something computational rather than optics. It's some AI decision baked into the raw. I could be totally wrong, but that's my guess. I'm no expert, but I've been shooting ILC cameras for 15 years or so.

if it's software I hope they will improve it soon.

I have forgot to take a photo with Halide app as well.

Now it's dark, I will take some night shots but in this area there is no comparison with my old android phone, iPhone wins hands down.
 
So I was about to return mine but went to a nearby store to check demo units.

Long story short, they're all like this. Tried a 13PM, a 13P like mine and a regular 13.

My unit was slightly softer at close range (at 50cm distance), but also slightly sharper on far objects 10m away.

If it's a manufacturing defect, it's quite widespread. If it's not, we must accept that the 13 series is just blurrier than before.

As a photographer this doesn't look like a software problem at all.

I have a couple hours before my return window closes and I don't know what to do
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menneisyys2
So I was about to return mine but went to a nearby store to check demo units.

Long story short, they're all like this. Tried a 13PM, a 13P like mine and a regular 13.

My unit was slightly softer at close range (at 50cm distance), but also slightly sharper on far objects 10m away.

If it's a manufacturing defect, it's quite widespread. If it's not, we must accept that the 13 series is just blurrier than before.

As a photographer this doesn't look like a software problem at all.

I have a couple hours before my return window closes and I don't know what to do
You also have to keep in mind that there’s a software glitch that keeps the phone defaulting to the Ultra Wide Lens without actually showing you that on the screen. In order to make it use the wide main lens, you need to cover the ultra wide one with your finger.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iphone27s
Are you sure you’ve testing the main lense? There are reports that the iPhone 13 to the

You also have to keep in mind that there’s a software glitch that keeps the phone defaulting to the Ultra Wide Lens without actually showing you that on the screen. In order to make it use the wide main lens, you need to cover the ultra wide one with your finger.
Thanks for pointing that out, but I'm sure I'm using the main camera. In my pictures I never go so close to trigger the macro mode, and with iOS15 it's super easy to check photo data (just swipe up)
 
I hereby declare this issue as #BLURRYGATE

I will be famous

Haha. Please let us know what you decided with the phone.
I also considered returning my phone, but my hopes are on that software can improve on this, along with being able to turn of macro mode and the extreme hdr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coso
Haha. Please let us know what you decided with the phone.
I also considered returning my phone, but my hopes are on that software can improve on this, along with being able to turn of macro mode and the extreme hdr.

Dpreview gallery is out: https://www.dpreview.com/samples/1716186585/apple-iphone-13-pro-sample-gallery

After checking also these, I'm inclined to keep mine. I can see the same haziness in text. Portraits are nice, better than mine, but I didn't do many and not with this good light. But I think I'll keep it. If I don't zoom too much maybe I'll forget that my old iPhone 8 is sharper.
 
You also have to keep in mind that there’s a software glitch that keeps the phone defaulting to the Ultra Wide Lens without actually showing you that on the screen. In order to make it use the wide main lens, you need to cover the ultra wide one with your finger.
Where has this been reported? I’ve not seen this anywhere.
 
Do a video where you pan from one side to the other and compare your old and new phone. You'll notice the image is very choppy. I'm having the same issues with the 13 pro max vs the 12 pro max.

I took photos with the 12 pro max and 13 pro max side by side and the blurry one zoomed is the 13 pro max...
One thing to consider is that the 13s have bigger lenses and sensors, so the depth of field is reduced. So objects "behind" or in front of the focus plane will be blurrier than with other phones. Like in the test here https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-13-pro-camera-review-outstanding-video/ in the Autofocus section

In my tests the focal plane was perfectly horizontal so this didn't matter of course
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.