Do you have anything to back that up or are you just making an assumption?I disable Face ID on my iPhone as it is. It's easier to spoof that than with my 5 digit passcode.
Do you have anything to back that up or are you just making an assumption?I disable Face ID on my iPhone as it is. It's easier to spoof that than with my 5 digit passcode.
No, Apple did this so you can't spoof FaceID.
Apple doesn't give a **** about third-party repair services, they care about ensuring the security of their devices.
You own the hardware of the phone, you don’t own the software. The screen is hardware, so I own it.You don't own it. And your comparison to a shower head is a pointless argument and you know it. There are lots of things you CAN'T fix. Sophisticated things.
Gotta say a lot of iPhone users have an unwarranted sense of their importance. If you're important enough (high rank government official) that someone would want to spy on you, they (the enemy Gub'ment) will have the technology to do a screen swap, have a spying components installed and get the FaceID working with a different screen.Ok. So design for easy repairs? Or design for security? Guess what I choose. It’s not necessarily about easy repair or easy design here. I suspect it’s about money, or security as a selling feature for the end users.
Odds are you don't own the glass either because you bought it on some installment plan that you're only going to pay half of anyway before trading it in. That said, you are not entitled to a working device that has been tampered with.You own the hardware of the phone, you don’t own the software. The screen is hardware, so I own it.
I love how people try to spin this as Apple being somehow SO greedy that they need money from iPhone screen repairs, that they went so far as to design the display to be irreplaceable because of the Face ID module. LOL!It's clearly a security issue. Apple probably found a likely or exploited scenario where hackers were able to fool faceid by "repairing" a phone. This just secures the device from those iphone screen fixit nitwits in those booths you find at shopping malls.
It's clearly a security issue. Apple probably found a likely or exploited scenario where hackers were able to fool faceid by "repairing" a phone. This just secures the device from those iphone screen fixit nitwits in those booths you find at shopping malls.
yeah that argument falls apart here. The ONLY reason that they pulled this was to block repairs.Ok. So design for easy repairs? Or design for security? Guess what I choose. It’s not necessarily about easy repair or easy design here. I suspect it’s about money, or security as a selling feature for the end users.
I mean, yah, gotta keep those repair shops happy right? Who needs security? Just let any joker mess with faceID. Customer won’t know the difference.
Go ahead and do what you want - you are free to modify your hardware. Just don’t insist that it still can run the same OS. Go make your own OS
The iCloud "scandal" was due to a phishing attack that got people to give up their iCloud passwords. Not Apples fault in any way.In an era where everyone has their personal information on mobile phones including but not limited to…
Credit cards
Driver license
Car/home keys
Vaccination info
Private messages
Location history
Political affiliation
Web history
Apple has to create as many security measures as possible.
Hackers only need to break in once to humiliate Apple. Remember the icloud scandal
yeah that argument falls apart here. The ONLY reason that they pulled this was to block repairs.
Have you ever consider Apple can easily do both? They are choosing to not do that.
Why is so hard to comprehend that just because some CAN do something does mean they should be allowed to?
People's sense of entitlement today is astounding.
So you are afraid of a repair shop getting your data or credit card # on your iPhone? That is a totally unrealistic event.Apple has always been about protecting our privacy and security.
It's obvious securing Face ID against repair shop tampering is a good thing.
I completely own my phone. Apple forfeit all property over my phone when I paid them over $1,100 in exchange for it. I only got a license to the software that runs in it. What makes you think I don’t?You don't own it. And your comparison to a shower head is a pointless argument and you know it. There are lots of things you CAN'T fix. Sophisticated things.
Maybe not to you. To people who understand there are people other than factory technicians with the expertise to diagnose and repair issues, let alone change oil, brake pads, etc. it makes a lot of sense.And that doesn’t make sense either.
What you own is a hunk of aluminum and glass. You don't "own" a working iPhone. You don't "own" the right to have Face ID.I completely own my phone. Apple forfeit all property over my phone when I paid them over $1,100 in exchange for it. I only got a license to the software that runs in it. What makes you think I don’t?
Inagine being this desperate to give over any consumer rights you might have to a corporation.What you own is a hunk of aluminum and glass. You don't "own" a working iPhone. You don't "own" the right to have Face ID.
If you tamper with your phone, all guarantee of functionality is void. Unauthorized repair = tampering. You're more than welcome to do whatever you like with the hunk of aluminum and glass that you "own". You are not entitled to a working device once you violate the terms of use.
"I should be allowed to fix the phone I own" is utter nonsense on so many levels.
What you own is a hunk of aluminum and glass. You don't "own" a working iPhone. You don't "own" the right to have Face ID.
If you tamper with your phone, all guarantee of functionality is void. Unauthorized repair = tampering. You're more than welcome to do whatever you like with the hunk of aluminum and glass that you "own". You are not entitled to a working device once you violate the terms of use.
"I should be allowed to fix the phone I own" is utter nonsense on so many levels.
I don't like to hold onto tech. I love new tech, but it has to be an actual improvement, and since Jobs died, so many of the released Apple products have been a downgrade on the tech from the Jobs era that I already owned.Again, voice your choice with your wallet.
Instead, you get a warranty backed by a multi-trillion-dollar company who can give you a new device at the drop of a hat. Sounds fine to me.
Should clarify - I didn't get a repair done, it was a kit that I was told would contain OEM parts. Apple can also fib, but again per the above you have a corporation to hold employees accountable, not a dude with good Google reviews (valid and quality as the service may be). Not everyone has a guy like that in their neighborhood. Even then, those costs are relative to the expensive high-tech device you're purchasing, and as it ages parts will be harder to come by (esp now). No one buys a shiny new Audi expecting to pay $250 for a new windshield when it gets cracked.
Sounds like you like to hold onto tech, and I agree Apple will charge out the wazoo for upgrades, but because people keep paying those prices, so I'd say you should continue to hold on. I used to fix first-get iPhone screens in college when Apple would simply replace the device, so good on people who know how to fix tech and all that, but I still don't think it's unfair for Apple to not open up super-secure technology like FaceID, TouchID, etc. to "unauthorized" third-party repairs, parts, firmware, etc. Doesn't fit the "it just works" motto, which isn't always the case because volume, but eh. Huge corporation backing the warranty instead of an LLC. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, Apple is still the first or second most valuable companies in the world. I'm not saying that will continue, but they seem to be doing just fine. Not a lot of customers I know are dusting off their pitchforks for independent repair shops.No, but they could take a page out of Amazon's book here (which, to be fair, is a page that was stolen right out of Steve Job's book) and put Customers first.
Make your Customers happy and the money follows.
Disappoint them enough times and watch the money dry up.
Apple hasn't gotten money from me since I bought my 6+. We're a small group, but we're growing.
The screen is seperate from the Face ID sensor. So how does this make any sense. There is no security issues with swapping the screen. If changing the sensor was the question then you'd be correct. The only way to preserve Face ID & Touch ID is to recycle the original part, which is what 3rd party repair shops currently do.No, Apple did this so you can't spoof FaceID.
Apple doesn't give a **** about third-party repair services, they care about ensuring the security of their devices.
Ah, who knew that something so simple as a tempered glass screen protector might actually prevent screen replacement, in the first place? D'oh? My 6S has a screen protector and I've NEVER even cracked it once. And I've dropped my phone several times... and it's landed face down many of those times. And not on carpet... tile.
An inability to replace the iPhone 13's display without breaking Face ID could have a major impact on companies that offer iPhone repairs, iFixit said today in an article advocating for Right to Repair laws.
![]()
iFixit first pointed out this repair issue in its iPhone 13 Pro teardown, and has confirmed it with multiple tests. Replacing the display of the iPhone 13 renders Face ID non-functional, so at-home repairs are not an option. Swapping an iPhone 13's display with a display from a new iPhone 13 results in an error message that says "Unable to activate Face ID on this iPhone."
An iPhone display repair, which could previously be done with hand-held tools, now requires a microscope and microsoldering tools or access to Apple's Independent Repair Provider Program, which repair shops have criticized for its "draconian" contracts and requirements.
At issue is a small microcontroller that pairs the iPhone 13 to its display. Apple does not have a tool that allows iPhone owners or repair shops not affiliated with Apple to pair a new screen to an iPhone 13. Authorized technicians who do work with Apple need to use Apple Services Toolkit 2 to log a repair to Apple's cloud services, thereby syncing the serial numbers of the iPhone and the display.
Some repair shops have found a workaround, but it is difficult and work intensive. A soldered chip must be moved from the original screen to the replacement, which iFixit says is "completely unprecedented" as screen repair is "incredibly common" and accounts for a good amount of the revenue that independent repair shops bring in.
iFixit says that Apple's decision to disable Face ID with a screen repair could cause small repair outlets to shut down, spend thousands on new equipment, or lose out on Apple repairs. The site also does not believe that the Face ID repair issue is an accident, as Apple has previously introduced similar repair restrictions for Touch ID, True Tone functionality with display repairs, and iPhone 12 cameras.
Other independent repair shops that iFixit spoke to believe that Apple has implemented this change in an effort to "thwart a customer's ability to repair," directing iPhone owners to Apple retail locations or Apple Authorized Service Providers for help with their displays.
With the iPhone 12, camera repairs initially required Apple's proprietary system configuration tool to function properly, and cameras that were replaced were non-functional. Apple addressed this issue with an update that notifies customers that the camera in their device might not be genuine, but doesn't disable it entirely. Apple could do something similar for Face ID in a future update, but it's not clear yet if that will happen.
Customers with an iPhone 13 would be best served by visiting an Apple Authorized Service Provider or an Apple Store for any kind of repair due to the difficulty of display replacements and the potential for Face ID failure. Without AppleCare+, display repairs are expensive, priced between $229 to $329 for Apple's iPhone 13 models.
Article Link: iPhone 13 Screen Replacements Can Break Face ID, a Repair Restriction iFixit Calls 'Completely Unprecedented'