I would say 5.8" and 6.5" for the regular and the Plus might even do it. Then let the Pro Max be 6.7".Apple's convoluted product lineups never really work out well and yet they just don't learn.
Mini (5.4")
iPhone (6.1")
iPhone Max (6.7")
Make all of these phones effectively the same, maybe $100 price differences as you go up the ladder to account for larger size.
Then you can have a Pro Max, essentially the Mac Pro of your iPhone lineup, that is supercharged and looks a little different and costs at least triple what the others do for the people with unlimited money/burning desire to have the latest and greatest.
In terms of dimensions, the 11 Pro is not much different from the 12/13/14.I have the 13 Mini now but I always thought that the 11 Pro at 5.85 inches was the perfect size.
The mini sold less than 5% of all iPhones, meaning that they were easily outsold by older models too. A mini Pro model would likely sell even worse.Hopefully this results in Apple smartening up and offering a Mini Pro next year – 3 years now that the mini was stunted (first 2 non-pro versions lacked basic camera functionality ie: no zooming lens, now just dropped altogether for the third cycle)
ALSO: Nobody wants outdated form factors when the alternatives (Android competition) has gone notch-less pretty much across the board.
Is Apple's strategy really a failure if those who considered the 14 Plus decided 'you know, I may as well go with the Pro, it's only a 100 more and I get a lot more features"?
The iPhone 14 Plus, Apple's 6.7-inch non-Pro iPhone, is facing no delays for delivery nearly a week after pre-orders opened, indicating demand for the new model may be low.
![]()
Pre-orders for all models of the iPhone 14 lineup opened last Friday, with delivery for all models except the iPhone 14 Plus beginning tomorrow. While delivery estimates for the iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max remain delayed by days and even weeks, all models of the iPhone 14 Plus remain available for same-day delivery upon launch on Friday, October 7, with no delays.
The lack of a delay for the iPhone 14 Plus comes amid a report that demand for the new model has been worse than expected. Earlier this week, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said demand for the non-Pro 6.7-inch iPhone is far lower than that of the 5.4-inch iPhone 13 mini from last year, which it effectively replaces in the lineup. Kuo said, "Apple's product segmentation strategy for standard models fails this year."
The iPhone 14 Plus is meant for customers who want a larger iPhone without all the features of Apple's high-end models. The iPhone 14 Plus, like the iPhone 14, features the same chip as the iPhone 13 Pro, camera improvements, and other minor enhancements. Reviewers called the iPhone 14 an "iPhone 13S," noting the little improvements and changes compared to its predecessor.
Article Link: iPhone 14 Plus Facing No Delay Nearly a Week After Pre-Orders Opened Amid Reports of Low Demand
1) People aren't buying iPhones every year or even every other year. The Apple nerds that do, will opt for the pro.
2) The launch date is later on, so it will inherently have lower pre-orders and orders may creep up as the launch day approaches.
3) The non-pro phones have historically had slower sales in the beginning. The 11 started selling better closer to the holidays. Sale success should be measured over a longer period of time beyond 1st week of pre-orders.
The type of casual user who would buy this model isn't the type to preorder a phone now that doesn't release until October. Over the long run the 14 Plus will become the best selling iPhone bar none. Just watch.
The mini sold less than 5% of all iPhones, meaning that they were easily outsold by older models too. A mini Pro model would likely sell even worse.
Almost nobody except some Macrumors diehards want minis.
And in the beginning there were Siri and TouchID. There's been nothing exciting for me since FaceIDI think Apple's big market for the 14 range will be people who are coming from an X, Xs, 11 or 12, but the 14 needed to bring more than the marginal improvements it offered to tempt a lot of those users.
I think it was time for a bigger change:
2007 - iPhone launches
2010 - we get the iPhone 4 with a retina display, front camera and boxy metal design
2014 - we got a major redesign with the 6 and its larger and slimmer form factor
2018 - the x makes the big switch to FaceID and full screen display
2022 - we get... a somewhat better camera and dynamic island?
I dunno, but older data showed the higher end machines often had higher profit margins. For example, the OLED iPhone X had a somewhat higher profit margin than the LCD iPhone 8.What are the margins though? I would presume Apple make more money on the 14 Plus than the 14 Pro given the higher component cost of the Pro.
I could probably live with Mini too. Can't read the SE well but I've read the Mini isn't too bad. And why do people keep saying how something will sell that has never been an option.Mini is cool - I'd get one if that was all there was and I'd love it.
BUT - when you have the choices and you are only going to buy one for your own self to use, I go for the Pro Max all the time now. It's like you want a cool 2 seater sporty car, but end up driving the SUV home.
Dito.Anectdotaly I see the minis everywhere when out and about. If I wasn’t reading macrumors I’d thought it had sold alright. Still thinking the mini might get picked up again once they can fit something new in it.
It's overpriced and underpowered. Best value Apple products always sell well (the regular iPad, the MBA, etc). That's why the SE has been a hit as a small phone and the better in almost every way Mini has not. Good vs poor value for the money.The mini sold less than 5% of all iPhones, meaning that they were easily outsold by older models too. A mini Pro model would likely sell even worse.
Almost nobody except some Macrumors diehards want minis.
The SE wasn't exactly a hit. It just didn't suck for sales like the mini did. However, the SE is consistently outsold by the regular iPhones (outside the mini), despite the SE's much lower price point.It's overpriced and underpowered. Best value Apple products always sell well (the regular iPad, the MBA, etc). That's why the SE has been a hit as a small phone and the better in almost every way Mini has not. Good vs poor value for the money.
It needs to be, more obviously, the cheap new iphone, only without being limited in any meaningful way.
I think Apple's big market for the 14 range will be people who are coming from an X, Xs, 11 or 12, but the 14 needed to bring more than the marginal improvements it offered to tempt a lot of those users.
I think it was time for a bigger change:
2007 - iPhone launches
2010 - we get the iPhone 4 with a retina display, front camera and boxy metal design
2014 - we got a major redesign with the 6 and its larger and slimmer form factor
2018 - the x makes the big switch to FaceID and full screen display
2022 - we get... a somewhat better camera and dynamic island?
Was looking good until $1799My ideal lineup:
iPhone SE (5.4-inch)- Starts at $399
iPhone N (5.8-inch) - Starts at $799
- No MagSafe and wireless charging
- Starts at 64 GB storage
- 2 rear cameras
iPhone N Plus (6.5-inch) - Starts at $899
iPhone N Pro Max (6.8-inch) - Starts at $1799
- Latest Ax chip
- Starts at 128 GB
- 3 rear cameras
- Latest Ax chip with higher core count
- Higher RAM
- Starts at 512GB storage
- 4 to 5 rear cameras
The current 512 GB Pro Max is already $1299. Maybe $1499 but starting at 256 GB?Was looking good until $1799
I mean they made real good money on it, no? 12% of your phone sales coming from a scrap-heap dated looking phone that's so cheap to produce is a win for Apple. They made it enticing enough for people to buy enough of them to cut a nice profit.The SE wasn't exactly a hit. It just didn't suck for sales as bad as the mini. However, the SE is consistently outsold by the regular iPhones (outside the mini).