How do you know more Pro’s being sold doesn’t also translate into less iPhones being sold on the whole? A quarter of Apples market is countries in economic recession or close to. The cost of living shooting up with 300% energy price increases has meant public spending is down on the whole across Europe. It could be that mobile phones aren’t a top priority for many this year, ever thought about that?
Ask the people who made the xr a popular phone.Well iPhone 14 is a 13R. Why should someone buy it?
I see it more in terms of maximising profits, rather than selling more iPhones for the sake of selling iPhones. We know that Apple is still grappling with supply constraints in China, and lowering prices in order to sell more iPhones may not mean anything if Apple can’t meet demand or earns significantly less on each iPhone.
Apple could also be betting that the iPhone is a lot more price inelastic than people here give it credit for.
What I like to think is that Apple has taken all these factors into consideration, and their current pricing strategy is what will allow for the maximum amount of profits for the quantity sold.
The obvious difference being:Ask the people who made the xr a popular phone.
The obvious difference being:
The Xr got Apple's the same latest and greatest A12 chip as the flaghsip model (Xs) upon release, whereas the 14 received last year's chip.
They raised prices overseas (in the areas that can handle it the least) while keeping prices cheaper at home knowing a raise in prices would be an indicator of inflation, having negative impacts on allies at a crucial time.
Imo, only to a small percentage of people that would make any difference. The people who bought the xr don’t obviously care about the latest and greatest. They seemingly want a good value phone.The obvious difference being:
The Xr got Apple's the same latest and greatest A12 chip as the flaghsip model (Xs) upon release, whereas the 14 received last year's chip.
Apart from tech enthusiasts that study benchmarks and specs, who cares about the processor in reality? The differences are so so small and unless you’re pushing your iPhone to it’s fully gaming capability or focussed on the battery lasting a little longer, an A15 is still one of the best chips in the mobile phone industry at this point.
Most people care about storage, imo. Fewer care about cpu and ram. I believe everybody cares about form and features.People care about CPU, RAM and Storage. It has been like this for mobile devices since at least two decades.
There isn't much else to distinguish mobile phones anyway, it's not that there are competitors left who offer alternative operating systems (besides iOS and Android), physical keyboards or other distinguishers.
The fairphone is fairly popular because of it's modular concept, which lowers TCO by a huge amount - for the price of being much bigger than other phones.
People care about CPU, RAM and Storage. It has been like this for mobile devices since at least two decades.
There isn't much else to distinguish mobile phones anyway, it's not that there are competitors left who offer alternative operating systems (besides iOS and Android), physical keyboards or other distinguishers.
The fairphone is fairly popular because of it's modular concept, which lowers TCO by a huge amount - for the price of being much bigger than other phones.
?Apple sold record levels y/y and if Pro are selling out that means record margins, again. If the base models are meeting last years numbers with this years pro exceeding expectations then that’s another y/y sales growth with even higher profits, yet these orchestrated articles serve to lower the stock valuation per share to cover the shorts, all of whom have bearish views of the market built into their projections,
Apple doesn’t mind this as they continue to buy back ever greater shares while leaving the dividend flat, and like clockwork the armchair experts here like a choir explains incorrectly what Apple failed to realize and how best to remedy it.
Within two more quarters Ming will have miraculously changed his projections to give large hedge funds enough lead time to produce new valuation targets that then raise the target price by 15-20 points which again miraculously hit their numbers.
Apple won’t mind as they announce record sales and increase their growth by 5+% leaving future financial analysts to label Apple not a growth stock but a dividend stock expecting Apple to raise the dividend yet it doesn’t happen (again) as Apple has their glasses now on the verge of being released and mini-LED, etc., only to reveal two quarters later more speculation on Apple car and a delay in AR thus freezing the stock again. More y/y results with new record sales/profits yet the stock remains in that comfort price while Apple buys down another $50 billion in stock touting the return to Investors none of which the Press interviews for comment and all of whom would say raise the dividend 4 fold already.
I was talking about average people who make up the majority of consumers. They aren’t knowledgeable about cpu and ram are they? My mum hasn’t decided to not upgrade this year because the iPhone 14 has an A15 in it and none of my work colleagues have even the remotest idea of what processors are in their smartphones. Is it competitive on cost and does it do nice pictures and Instagram is about the technical depth.
The iPhone 13 mini had a higher profit (per storage 128/256/512GB) per unit than the iPhone SE2/SE3 and equal to with the iPhone 13 Pro. There is a news article on this site specifically showing the ASP and profits per model actually. Have a search you'll find it.They did this with the mini, making people wait for the presumably lower profit phone to launch.
Maybe you're surrounded by the wrong "average" people.
Doesn't matter if I talked to others about Psion vs. Palm in 2000 or about iphone vs. fairphone. Specs matter. I've even seen people comparing camera specs (which don't vary much for real life purposes).
And the rest of the people either see no point in buying tech stuff or they just settle for something cheap that someone sells to them - and that's usually not an iphone.
Plus, the sales figures reinforce this. The Pro sells better because it is the newer model. The standard model is last years model with a bit more RAM. People who were interested in that model most likely have bought it last year already.
We’ll you sheep can get ripped off every year.
Imo, only to a small percentage of people that would make any difference. The people who bought the xr don’t obviously care about the latest and greatest. They seemingly want a good value phone.
Here in Europe the iPhone 14 Plus is priced 1169€ which is pricier than the iPhone 13/12/11 Pro and X/XS price tag 1159 € from previous years.It’s priced wrong for what it is.
Here in Europe the iPhone 14 Plus is priced 1169€ which is pricier than the iPhone 13/12/11 Pro and X/XS price tag 1159 € from previous years.
The iPhone 14 is at 1019€ which is above the 1000€ price tag.
Here’s why People aren’t buying these :
- People are not willing to spend more than 1000€ for an iPhone which isn’t the top of the line.
- Apple increase prices but People budget remain the same.
Here in Europe the iPhone 14 Plus is priced 1169€ which is pricier than the iPhone 13/12/11 Pro and X/XS price tag 1159 € from previous years.
The iPhone 14 is at 1019€ which is above the 1000€ price tag.
Here’s why People aren’t buying these :
- People are not willing to spend more than 1000€ for an iPhone which isn’t the top of the line.
- Apple increase prices but People budget remain the same.