Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think it is triggered by the speed of the car and not the actual connection to the vehicle. Maybe there's a Siri shortcut that could work.
As soon as I sit down in my car (as it perceives the Bluetooth connection) it asks me to end the workout.
 
Proximity data will be used. How far apart the watch and the phone needs to be before this kicks in is still to be determined I guess.
Ideally the user should be able to manually adjust the trigger distance.

I suspect it will function similarly to how Apple Watch and Macs interact. If the signal is strong, you can unlock a Mac without typing in your password or using Touch ID. However, if the signal in week, it won't work.

But I think it would operate just like how you can now use a Watch to unlock your Mac. It's determining that by signal strength.
Let’s hope it works more reliably than the feature to unlock your Mac with the AppleWatch - because that is flakey even at the enormous distance of around 50cm/20inch :rolleyes:.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bchery21 and EugW
Ideally the user should be able to manually adjust the trigger distance.




Let’s hope it works more reliably than the feature to unlock your Mac with the AppleWatch - because that is flakey even at the enormous distance of around 50cm/20inch :rolleyes:.

Regarding being able to manually adjust the trigger distance: I don't see Apple being the kind of company that would allow that, because it involves a bit more mucking around that, perhaps, the user base of Android likes to do, but is less true of the typical user base of Apple products. Or, I might say it's not in Apple's trajectory of how to interface with devices.

There is some slight reliability issues with unlocking Mac with the Watch, I agree. There are times when I'm right next to the laptop and the Watch isn't triggering the laptop to unlock. I suspect it may be due to radio frequency interference resulting in the Mac interpreting the Watch as farther away than it is? I'm not sure.

That said, I've also had the Watch unlock the Mac at times when I don't want it to. My computer is in my office that is directly above the downstairs guest bathroom. There are times when I'm washing my hands downstairs and the laptop unlocks because it thinks I'm close by (and probably also because a network event triggered the laptop to awake).
 
Ideally the user should be able to manually adjust the trigger distance.
I'm sure you'll agree that won't happen.


Let’s hope it works more reliably than the feature to unlock your Mac with the AppleWatch - because that is flakey even at the enormous distance of around 50cm/20inch :rolleyes:.
There are two factors here. Does the Mac sense the Watch? and Does the Mac actually unlock?

I find in some cases that the Mac will sense there is a Mac nearby but not actually unlock it quickly. At least in my house, occasionally it hangs a bit. I'm thinking this second issue wouldn't be problem for a Watch turning on the iPhone display, since it's not actually unlocking the phone.
 
always on? or often on? what if two people (your old grandparents for instance) like to look at their always on display but it keeps turning off every time granddad leaves to take a leak?
Are you assuming that they are both looking at a locked iPhone just waiting for time to pass or for notifications to come in? Or are you assuming they are watching a video or doing something on an unlocked iPhone and when Grandpa leaves to go to the bathroom that the unlocked phone will lock itself because it isn’t in proximity anymore?
 
yeah this feels a little sneaky, not really "always on" is it, apple?

wow there seem to be some real interesting takes out there. Somehow apple managed to make my watch battery life good enough for real AOD. But for the phone, they are being sneaky. I want my display glowing always. Like the name says. Is that so hard?
Maybe there will be a setting for your weird requirement. I guess most customers couldn’t care less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsplusmacs
Hopefully this put to rest the weird claims here by some members that the Apple Watch's alway-on display doesn't use more power than when off.

While the always-on display is one of my favourite features for Apple Watch, I'm not foolish enough to think it doesn't require any additional energy.


Ultimately though, who cares? In both situations, you wouldn't need the screen on.
I'm pretty sure no one said it doesn't use more power, just that is negligible.
 
yeah this feels a little sneaky, not really "always on" is it, apple?

wow there seem to be some real interesting takes out there. Somehow apple managed to make my watch battery life good enough for real AOD. But for the phone, they are being sneaky. I want my display glowing always. Like the name says. Is that so hard?
LOL. This is for PRIVACY my darling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot
maybe it will respect Focus modes so "bed time" mode when you have taken off your watch, AOD will still work.
They just posted the iOS 16 user guide and...
The display automatically turns off when iPhone is face down or obstructed from view, not near a paired Apple Watch, when a CarPlay session begins, while Continuity Camera is in use, while Low Power Mode is on, while Sleep Focus is on, or at your usual bedtime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsplusmacs
How about an option to have the watch ask if you really want to leave without the phone if the distance reaches a certain level (or out of reach). That would be a nice feature!

…or does it already do this? I’m still on iPhone 8 so I might have missed out on something…
 
How about an option to have the watch ask if you really want to leave without the phone if the distance reaches a certain level (or out of reach). That would be a nice feature!

…or does it already do this? I’m still on iPhone 8 so I might have missed out on something…
It does. There's a "left behind" notification you can turn on. I think it's part of the "Find my" functionality.
 
Things always become obvious after the fact.
There are already many things that turn off when you don't see them. For instance phones already turn off the screen when held to one's ear. My camera turns off the back screen when the viewfinder is held to the eye. Refrigerators turn off the light when they're shut. Turning off something when it won't be seen to give the illusion of always being on is simply too common a concept to be labeled innovative.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.