if the 14PM had USBC id have got it but it hasnt so it makes it an easy decision for me. ill wait for iPhone 15 and if that doesnt have it ill wait for iPhone 16. i refuse to buy another device with lightning port!Well this just killed iPhone 14 Pro envy for me. Waiting for the 15.
they are doing the minimum and holding stuff back/staggering features. iPhone 15 will be a basic refresh of 14 models. you can obviously see what they are planning...The iPad „Pro“ ships with an USB-C Connector since 2018. Apple explained in 2018 that you need the transfer speed of USB-C for a „Pro“ model.
The same is true for the iPhone Pro, but surprisingly, there is a difference between "Pro" and "Pro" in Apple's eyes.
To make this story even more ridiculous, Apple already has all the parts and drivers it needs from the iPad Pro. But this shows the nature of Apple, it's all about the money. Apple doesn't want to ship the best products, it only wants to ship products that will allow it to make the most profit.
This strategy allows Apple to sell the iP14 twice. This year without and next year with an USB-C port imtergrated.
If all you are sending is smaller files, yes, it usually works just fine. It you try to use it on larger files (10-30GB), the transfer fails like 9/10 times. YOU might be able to go all wireless, but most of us still care to have the fastest and most reliable method to transfer data. Wireless speeds are somewhat catching up to wired speeds, but they still won't be as reliable as a wired connection. WiFi 7 is still a couple of years out at least before it's affordable enough for the consumer market. It'll probably take even longer for Apple to implement it into their products judging by how they are dragging their feet on 6E.
Good luck restoring 1TB of data from your old iPhone to a new one over WiFi 6. Honestly, the part of getting a new iPhone I despite the most. In theory and on paper with the published speeds, it should work well, it never does.
If Apple is going to go the "no/old port" route, they should at least support the best and newest WiFi and BT standards and do it in such a way that the implementations are credible. Apple does many things well, their networking stacks/layers are anything but in that category.
same, happy with my iPhone 11 Pro Max. Still enjoying its curved edges and the green is simply gorgeous!I have an iPhone 11 Pro and have no interest upgrading until they add a USB-C port
I agree with your prediction. Yes, they are holding back/staggering features for more profit. They are not giving customers their best products.they are doing the minimum and holding stuff back/staggering features. iPhone 15 will be a basic refresh of 14 models. you can obviously see what they are planning...
iPhone 15/Plus will get Dynamic Island, A16 Bionic (4nm) with 6GB RAM.
iPhone 15 Pro will get A17 Bionic (3nm) with 8GB RAM and under display/home button touch id.
iPhone 15 Pro Max will get the same and a periscope camera.
All come with USB-C
Even with that: I'm at 11hrs to restore/migrate data to my new 14PM from my 13PM (I have 1.5Gbps up and down, business connection, fiber directly into my premises, I'm the only person on my wifi network and it tests absolutely perfectly for all other uses).
Wireless isn't ready for backup/restore of any appreciable size device.
That's why after 15 years I moved to something else... Fold 4The iPad „Pro“ ships with an USB-C Connector since 2018. Apple explained in 2018 that you need the transfer speed of USB-C for a „Pro“ model.
The same is true for the iPhone Pro, but surprisingly, there is a difference between "Pro" and "Pro" in Apple's eyes.
To make this story even more ridiculous, Apple already has all the parts and drivers it needs from the iPad Pro. But this shows the nature of Apple, it's all about the money. Apple doesn't want to ship the best products, it only wants to ship products that will allow it to make the most profit.
This strategy allows Apple to sell the iP14 twice. This year without and next year with an USB-C port imtergrated.
I just cancelled my order for 8 iPhone Pro Max. Apple is weak in doing good things for their customers. All they want is your money. They don´t care about us.
Well, there was a theory that Apple wanted to transition to a completely port-less iPhone, and THAT was the reason why they didn’t switch to usb-c. But it’s been so long now, i dunno.It would be a fair question to ask in an interview. I’m just curious what the reason is. My usage doesn’t require USB-C, so this is a non-issue for me, but it does seem strange that they haven’t updated the port. Is there a new USB standard being released soon?
9.6 Gbps Theoretical only with 4 streams @ HT160 (160 MHz width)…WiFi 6 is 9.6 Gbps.
Apple recommends using iCloud Photos to access ProRAW files in full resolution on a Mac
How are you finding it?That's why after 15 years I moved to something else... Fold 4
The Wi-Fi-6 up to the 14 Pro Max is not even at HT160 (HT80 so around 600-800 Mbps real world) and is only a fraction of basic USB3 specs and I mean comparing to the 5Gbps one not even the 10 or 20 GBPs variant.. Maybe not a big deal for the basic user or me either but for people who maybe record a lot and need to transfer stuff often for editing could be a hassle. Seems your argument is more like “I don’t need it so no one else should either” “If you don’t agree with me buy something else” … Also FYI some of the High end Androids actually have HT160 support…Who needs needs faster USB when you have wifi? What year is it? Next year you'll have wifi 7 and this will be irrelevant. If you want to use an old fashioned cable, buy an android phone.
I never really bought that theory — on the other hand, with 5G speeds potentially getting to between 10-20 Gbps, maybe they thought the infrastructure for this would be built by now, and there wouldn’t be a great need for a wired connection with wireless speeds this high? I was thinking it had something to do with knowing what standard might be legislated first so they don’t have to change it again. But that doesn’t really make any sense either.Well, there was a theory that Apple wanted to transition to a completely port-less iPhone, and THAT was the reason why they didn’t switch to usb-c. But it’s been so long now, i dunno.
I think the USB C port might be more fragile. If you look inside there’s a tongue that could be snapped off with over enthusiastic plugging.The Wi-Fi-6 up the 14 Pro Max is not even at HT160 and is only a fraction of basic USB3 specs and I mean the 5Gbps one not even the 10 or 20 variant.. Maybe not a big deal for the basic user or me either but for people who maybe record a lot and need to transfer stuff often for editing could be a hassle. Seems your argument is more like “I font need so so no one else should”
AirDrop is fast but you’re limited to Apple to Apple transfers. If you’re editing videos professionally, generally people want the flexibility of external storage devices.AirDrop is very fast. Wi-Fi works well too. This is annoying but it's hardly a problem compared to video. Which is far far larger. It's clear I think that Apple is going away from lightning next year…
People shooting video and editing on anything other than a Mac or iPad.Why would anybody use a cable when AirDrop is stupidly fast, like, way faster?
It's not very common to deal with 10-30Gb files on a mobile phone.
The article is focused on photography and file sizes less than 100Mb. Transfering a collection of photos is were AirDrop excel.