Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wonder how it can be legal that a phone makes a 911 call without asking the owner first. If those false calls happen to often, it will be shut down in Germany very soon, as it is a crime to make a false 911 call.
It’s only a false call if you knowingly make a false call. Just like if you call the police when what you think is a robbery, but not actually, that’s not false.
 
much like with cars in general, I’m really not a fan of “here let’s do this automatically without your consent or control”

I turned this feature off on my new iPhone.

I’ll give you a more mundane less urgent example that is still irritating.

Auto rain sensing wipers.


Sounds like a great idea. Problem is, wiper blades/inserts never last as long as they’re supposed to — even “OEM” blades are stuttering maddeningly in 3 months.

So winter rolls around and you’re trying to clear off dust/grime etc from the glass — and the auto wipers won’t notice that. Or it’s been raining lately but you can’t rely on the auto wipers because the stuttering will drive you nuts. So you have to turn auto mode off and manually just do one, heavily lubricated swipe and turn it off, and manually do another swipe when you need it.

Having auto features is convenient, but I think the gradual shift away from any controls is a miss.
Take some 70% ETOH and a paper towel, and wipe off the contact portion of the blades. You can also use regular windshield cleaner solution. You will be surprised at the dirt you remove--and that's why your new-ish wipers are stuttering.
 
Apple probably thinks that it’s better to be safe than sorry with crash detection, but there’s a “boy who cried wolf” issue here. Too many false alarms and emergency dispatchers are just going to start ignoring these calls!

Surely it would be simple to determine when a “crash” occurs, for example, in a recreational mountain resort area, and adjust parameters accordingly?
 
On the bright side if you have a "ski fall" with the force of car accident maybe it isn't so bad the phone is calling 911.

Over 70 such calls but there were no actual emergencies. Even if a real, serious ski crash were to occur, most of these are going to occur in commercial ski resorts with professional, medically trained ski patrol/mountain rescue staff who are best placed to triage injuries and call for additional assistance if necessary.
 
Apple probably thinks that it’s better to be safe than sorry with crash detection, but there’s a “boy who cried wolf” issue here. Too many false alarms and emergency dispatchers are just going to start ignoring these calls!

Surely it would be simple to determine when a “crash” occurs, for example, in a recreational mountain resort area, and adjust parameters accordingly?

For sure. The crash detection algorithm and its inputs (accelerometers, GPS, microphone, post-crash movement, camera, etc) need to be further considered and adjusted. Apple will get there.
 
I still have an iPhone 13 Pro but I can tell you that my phone has dialed 911 several times without my asking it to. In one case, it seemed to be triggered by my passing under a traffic light at a busy intersection. Granted, this is probably another technical issue. But I suspect turning off the "feature" is a good idea. I've been an Apple guy for a very long time and I am still heavily invested in the ecosystem (note my gear list below). But, for the very first time, I'm beginning to think about not sticking with Apple during my next product-update cycle. This company needs to work out its bugs before adding new gee-whiz features. Many of us realize this but Apple simply isn't listening. We will only get their attention by not buying their products.
 
This is going to result in regulation, I'm willing to bet big money on that.

Apple better get this **** under control. A good start would be to only do the 911 calling if the phone is paired to a car's bluetooth.
Or only enabled if someone is traveling at 40 mph or above.

Or only using Apple Maps and/or on Bluetooth.

Or, you know, just ban iPhone 14’s from ski slopes and roller coasters 😆
 
Apple probably thinks that it’s better to be safe than sorry with crash detection, but there’s a “boy who cried wolf” issue here. Too many false alarms and emergency dispatchers are just going to start ignoring these calls!

Surely it would be simple to determine when a “crash” occurs, for example, in a recreational mountain resort area, and adjust parameters accordingly?
I think iPhones have better ways of knowing whether you’re in a car through GPS. Find My showing when someone I’m sharing locations with is in a car has been pretty accurate. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a false flag on that. And they’re not connected to CarPlay or anything like that. What’s weird is how rollercoasters are triggering that as you’re not moving that much relative to the ground. Plus, the ride doesn’t follow the road and if you’re in a car, you’re more likely than not, on the road… Imo it’s just the algorithm they’re using that was obviously developed too quickly and was not thought through.
 
Easy fix: just verify that you want to use crash protection. Verify all the way down.

enable.jpg
 
much like with cars in general, I’m really not a fan of “here let’s do this automatically without your consent or control”

I turned this feature off on my new iPhone.

I’ll give you a more mundane less urgent example that is still irritating.

Auto rain sensing wipers.


Sounds like a great idea. Problem is, wiper blades/inserts never last as long as they’re supposed to — even “OEM” blades are stuttering maddeningly in 3 months.

So winter rolls around and you’re trying to clear off dust/grime etc from the glass — and the auto wipers won’t notice that. Or it’s been raining lately but you can’t rely on the auto wipers because the stuttering will drive you nuts. So you have to turn auto mode off and manually just do one, heavily lubricated swipe and turn it off, and manually do another swipe when you need it.

Having auto features is convenient, but I think the gradual shift away from any controls is a miss.
The feature is because, many people in serious car accidents are not able to call 911.

Surely a sensible arrangement could be reached where Apple pay a large fine for each false call and it actually results in a net benefit for everyone, encouraging Apple to refine the technology further whilst covering the costs of false calls (and then some) in the meantime?

Edit: if not, why not @egodspeed ?
The problem is, they don't want to trigger false negatives. You don't want people knocked out in a crash, then not have the phone dial 911. False negatives are far worse than false positives. If anything, the best solution would be to have the phone make the annoying sound for longer before it dials 911.

Not that long ago, I was driving, someone pulled out in front of me. I hit the breaks very hard. The alarm went off, I pulled over to a safe spot, grabbed the phone and turned off the noise before it called 911. The system worked.
I don’t think fining them has ever done anything but they need to be fined per call.

This is even truer about the beancounters at Apple.
It's far better to have 100 false positives than have a single person knocked out at the bottom of a canyon and not get help. The phone warns you before it dials 911. It gives you time to swipe the switch that says, "No. Don't call." Perhaps they should just make the delay a bit longer.
 
That's not good. I wonder if this feature will be a net positive or net negative in the end. Either way, Apple may have to tweak the feature with a software update.
 
Apple’s obsession with secrecy has led them to eliminate all support beyond “erase and reinstall,” and if that doesn’t work, “RTA to engineering so engineering can tell you to keep your devices up to date.” Unfortunately, this has some serious consequences when the bug is a safety issue.
Especially here, where they had and have a moral responsibility (IMHO) to the public to NOT do this with regard to emergency services. But, it's Apple.... they do what they want, save for extreme public and political pressure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naraxus
This is going to result in regulation, I'm willing to bet big money on that.

Apple better get this **** under control. A good start would be to only do the 911 calling if the phone is paired to a car's bluetooth.
Since this from Ohio and seems to be missing critical information like how many calls a day and how many of them are by accident from other sources, I'm taking all this with a grain of salt as everyone should. Ohio has almost 6 mill 911 calls a year https://www.911.gov/issues/911-stats-and-data/.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.