Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That’s interesting — so how could someone riding a roller coaster or on a ski slope not notice this sound? Even if the person didn’t pay attention to it, someone around them would. Could they be purposely ignoring it just for kicks?
What one person describes as "horrid loud" inside the quiet confines of his car does not necessarilly mean it's particularly obvious on a noisy roller coaster. Additionally, getting to the phone in the latter circumstance may not be trivial.
 
much like with cars in general, I’m really not a fan of “here let’s do this automatically without your consent or control”

I turned this feature off on my new iPhone.

I’ll give you a more mundane less urgent example that is still irritating.

Auto rain sensing wipers.


Sounds like a great idea. Problem is, wiper blades/inserts never last as long as they’re supposed to — even “OEM” blades are stuttering maddeningly in 3 months.

So winter rolls around and you’re trying to clear off dust/grime etc from the glass — and the auto wipers won’t notice that. Or it’s been raining lately but you can’t rely on the auto wipers because the stuttering will drive you nuts. So you have to turn auto mode off and manually just do one, heavily lubricated swipe and turn it off, and manually do another swipe when you need it.

Having auto features is convenient, but I think the gradual shift away from any controls is a miss.
I’m sure it varies by maker. My wipers do very well at being on when I need them and off when I don’t. I also don’t have stuttering or streaks that early in their life.
Or only enabled if someone is traveling at 40 mph or above.

Or only using Apple Maps and/or on Bluetooth.

Or, you know, just ban iPhone 14’s from ski slopes and roller coasters 😆
Apple Maps? 😂 If it relied on that, no one would have to worry about using it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gusmula and JM
I wonder if/when an emergency response delayed by one of these calls leads to a loss of life or permanent injury and the victim could sue Apple?
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Crash detection is something that should have been introduced through some sort of regulated process. It’s the sort of thing that needs the testing an validation that airbags are put through for example. Or medical equipment.

Just the panic button feature on the iPhone and Apple Watch has resulted in false alerts to my friends and family while at the gym. And all because my wrist would press against the Apple Watch button assigned to long press for panic.

Oddly I don’t remember seeing anyone saved by that feature mentioned on this site. But I could be wrong.

Honestly all these are GREAT features. But they need more refinement.
 
As an engineer, the algorithm change should be very simple... not sure why it's not implemented yet.

Crash detected -> Verify GPS location (exclusions for amusement parks and ski slopes) -> Call or not call 911

This should be an easy fix: Integrate with Apple Maps and disable crash detection when GPS shows that you’re on a ski slope or at an amusement park.

Not a definite fix. You'll ignore genuine crashes at theme parks. Pop up theme parks happen near my house during summer. Plus there are several roller coasters in the middle of Las Vegas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
After a big crash, if the owner is not conscious (which is the exact use case of this feature) the iPhone should be not moving anymore, so it should just trigger the call after x seconds of zero sensor activity after the crash detection is firing. That would filter those cases and then you don’t need to guess the place via gps which is prone to errors (you can crash your car around a skiing station) or checking if the Bluetooth of the car is connected (some people don’t do that, and also the car could be damaged or turned off because of the crash)
 
This is going to result in regulation, I'm willing to bet big money on that.

Apple better get this **** under control. A good start would be to only do the 911 calling if the phone is paired to a car's bluetooth.
Or while in driving mode. Geo fencing certain amusement parks for obvious reasons were it doesn’t turn on automatically.
 
This should be an easy fix: Integrate with Apple Maps and disable crash detection when GPS shows that you’re on a ski slope or at an amusement park.
But what if someone actually falls off a roller coaster in an amusement park?

Then that's a real emergency that won't get reported.

Also, don't blame Apple. The iPhone clearly asks the owner for confirmation that they are indeed in trouble. Why aren't the iPhone users tapping "No" or canceling the call before it happens?
 
Easy fix: just verify that you want to use crash protection. Verify all the way down.

View attachment 2133162
Can I assume you have never gone skiing? As the article said phone and watch are buried under clothing so you don’t feel the vibration notifications. I have had quite a few false fall notifications on my watch, during warm weather I can easily catch them. In winter garb, no way.
 
Can I assume you have never gone skiing? As the article said phone and watch are buried under clothing so you don’t feel the vibration notifications. I have had quite a few false fall notifications on my watch, during warm weather I can easily catch them. In winter garb, no way.
Was a joke attempt: verify that you want to verify....ad infinitum
 
The headline makes it sound like this is a huge issue. But, without more information, here’s what I would have to guess:

It’s not very frequent, not all that wide spread (in areas that don’t have skiing or theme parks) and it’s not keeping lines so bogged down that some died who otherwise wouldn’t have died had 1 false crash detection call not been made 🤷🏻‍♂️
The numbers in the article aren’t enough, that’s odd. Ski resorts are usually in small communities with small EMS. and fire departments so the costs and manpower for mandatory response is a bigger strain.
 
To be fair, being paired to a car's bluetooth isn't a great solution. It rules out those who are passengers involved in a crash. Also it may be the case the car's bluetooth cuts out during the crash or you mistakenly had bluetooth switched off on your phone rendering you unable to rely on the feature.
Indeed. I've never even been able to get Bluetooth to work in my car and I consider myself relatively tech-savvy. I wonder how many "normal" people actually have Bluetooth set up.
 
I think iPhones have better ways of knowing whether you’re in a car through GPS. Find My showing when someone I’m sharing locations with is in a car has been pretty accurate. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a false flag on that. And they’re not connected to CarPlay or anything like that. What’s weird is how rollercoasters are triggering that as you’re not moving that much relative to the ground. Plus, the ride doesn’t follow the road and if you’re in a car, you’re more likely than not, on the road… Imo it’s just the algorithm they’re using that was obviously developed too quickly and was not thought through.
I am sure Apple thought to use GPS but there are two problems; GPS is a battery hog and linking to maps consumes cell data. I want neither of these to occur. Crash detection belongs with the car, that is where mine currently resides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechNutt
Would be a lot easier if it only worked using “Do Not Disturb While Driving.” Since this can go on automatically, you generally wouldn’t be driving a car through an amusement park or down a ski hill.
 
Surely it would be simple to determine when a “crash” occurs, for example, in a recreational mountain resort area, and adjust parameters accordingly?
But what if someone crashes badly with their mountain bike?

A better solution is to have an AirTag-like device that does the crash detection, that you can attach to your bike or in your car, and which notifies detected crashes to the nearby phone for the 911 call. Really, the vehicles are in a much better position to detect crashes than a phone.
 
I thought you could get fined for placing false 911 calls?

As always it is a double standard. An individual makes a fake 911 call they get in trouble. A huge company does it and nothing. An individual sells an old pair of tires that blow out and cause and accident, they get prosecuted for manslaughter. A huge tire chain sells expired tires for months and when a pair blow out causing an accident they get a simple fine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.