Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wut? It will just be in the pockets of those on the rollercoaster.
Depends on the coaster. Jurassic Park Velocicoaster at Universal made us take everything out of our pockets and put it into lockers. We even had to go through a metal detector.

But other coasters at the same park didn't have this requirement.

It probably depends on specific ride factors like how likely it is for an ejected object to hit another rider or spectator.
 
OnStar has been providing automoble crash detection and notification for years. In my opinion this is Apple is trying to do what OnStar has doing better for years, because OnStars's crash detection is built into the automobile. Whenever I get an iPhone with crash detection, it will be turned OFF.
For Onstar, you have to have a qualified plan (which MANY people let expire) OnStar plan, working electrical system, cell reception and GPS signal required.

OnStar services. The most basic plan is the Connected Vehicle plan and this costs $24.99 per month. With this plan, you get services like vehicle location and remote personalization. The next plan is the Safety and Security plan, which costs $29.99 per month. This plan includes OnStar's safety features, like roadside assistance and automatic crash detection but does not include the connected services found in the Connected Vehicle plan.
To combine the features of the Connected Vehicle plan and the Safety and Security plan, you'll want the Essentials plan. This plan costs $39.99 per month and includes all of the features found in the other two plans


For Ford Synch’s crash detection: The vehicle's electrical system (including the battery), the wireless service provider's signal, and a connected mobile phone must all be available and operating for 911 Assist to function properly. These systems may become damaged in a crash. The paired mobile phone must be connected to SYNC, and the 911 Assist feature enabled, in order for 911 to be dialed. When the feature is ON, 911 Assist uses your paired and connected mobile phone to assist

Apple’s approach is ”free” and always with you, including in other people’s cars, Ubers and cabs, that may not be equipped. A majority of the cars on the road do NOT have a crash notification/EMER service feature. The car’s electrical system must be working, the car’s cell antenna must survive the accident. The iPhone is self contained and generally more survivable than the vehicle’s integrated components that all need to work. Electing to disable a safety feature, no matter how unlikely the chance is that you will be in an accident in which it could buy you life-saving minutes, is simply stupid IMO. There is no harm to you if it gives a rare “false” detection, which you would likely decline. But in the accidents that do occur, like a teen hitting a tree, or rolling down a dark embankment, on some rural back road at 3:00am, it truly could be the difference in surviving.

“automatic crash notification in cars is to reduce the response time by immediately determining that an event has occurred. According to published analysis of emergency response calls, each minute of response time, represents a 7% reduction in mortality”
 
Should be a fun (for testing) bug to fix. Always unintended things pop up after you deploy software / features.
 
Considering the forces at play on some roller coasters, is this really surprising?
I do wonder how Apple would exclude this, though.
Based on location? What if you’re on a roller coaster that’s not on Apple Maps yet?
Well the g forces designed into a rollercoaster ride are in a safe range while those in a major crash are a lot higher.
 
Not going to happen, but ok.
It has happened since I remember a story awhile back ago when a rollercoaster passenger was injured by somebody’s cellphone and she asked the publics help in identifying the person on the amusement park surveillance tape so they could sue them for the injuries they sustained. But if you want to play the lottery you can just do not be surprised if you lose.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: addamas
I’m just here to offer my gratitude to the MR community — the sycophants specifically — for this unintentionally hilarious example of what passes for argument. There are too many posts to cite. The continued defense of Apple by any means has made a truly enjoyable wake-up read with my morning coffee.

Thank you.

There needs to be more moderation here to get rid of these blind fanatics. We are all here for our appreciation of their devices but the crazies come out in full force to show their undying loyalty in anything that could be seen as negative against Apple.
 
Simple fix: turn off your device before boarding a roller coaster.

So much headlines for such a non-issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rogifan
Once again the media and others assuming this is easily solved for and it’s just a case of Apple engineers overlooking something or not testing for edge cases. How do they know that?
 
Once again the media and others assuming this is easily solved for and it’s just a case of Apple engineers overlooking something or not testing for edge cases. How do they know that?
I think this is more of an irresponsible user not an Apple problem since cell phones should not be on rollercoasters considering their is people who have gotten hurt by cellphones flying out of peoples pockets and injuring a rider.
 
"Apple tested the feature with over a million hours of car crash data and real-world driving analysis."
but but but it didn't work in the junkyard where the iPhone failed to notice some car crashes and the rollercoaster.

Is it really a million hours?
 
Scenario: you arrive at the theme park with a large group of friends, but decide to split up into several sub-groups, to go to different attractions first. How do you expect them to coordinate meeting back up later on? Mobile phones. So... what, do you expect them to designate one person to skip the ride and wait at the ride's exit to hold the phones for everyone?
Wow people have gotten so reliant on their phones. We have done this before cell phones were a thing and as common as they are now. “Let’s meet back here in X amount of time”. How did people get by in the 80s or 90s or earlier wow!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
Considering the forces at play on some roller coasters, is this really surprising?
I do wonder how Apple would exclude this, though.
Based on location? What if you’re on a roller coaster that’s not on Apple Maps yet?
Worse, what if you get into an accident in a parking lot next to a roller coaster? What is the error acceptance for position these days?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BanjoDudeAhoy
There are cases where phones can fly out of the person’s pocket and hit someone, hence the loose article policy at some parks
Most parks also have a skinny jeans rule. So if you are wearing skinny jeans its perfectly fine to have your phone in your pocket.

No JNCO jeans though. ;)
 
iPhone 14 and watch 8 suddenly became even more pathetic. The single new feature available to all those who don’t live in the us and do not ovulate is actually unreliable (not triggered in some car crashes and triggered in events that are not car crashes). An unreliable safety feature is way worse than not having the feature at all, as this risks triggering false alarms and wasting emergency services time, possibly delaying response to actual emergencies. Apple needs to change course as the current one is looking really really bad.

And the award for most hysterical and hyperbolic comment of the day goes to…
 
  • Haha
Reactions: decafjava
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.