Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
To be honest I’ll be ignoring the 48mp setting in future as I don’t need the resolution to be that high. My DSLR takes pictures at 10mp and they are good enough to be blown up to A3. It’s a nice have on a phone don’t get me wrong, but not entirely necessary. I’m more interested in the lens quality rather than the amount of pixels that are mostly artificially duplicated anyway.
 
Guys, don't fall for this feature. Because I fell for it.

Nearly everything I take with my 14 Pro ends up being 12 Megapixels. You don't decide.

The use cases where it will be 48 Megapixels are almost non-existent. You have to be outside, during the summer, on a non-cloudy day, and not under a shadow.
 
I would be SO happy to have a smaller option, even if it's just a 5.8" screen device.

That way, the lineup would consist of 3 models: 5.8", 6.2"(yes, the base iPhone is getting bigger this year) and 6.7"
I think also a slimmer device like narrower it could benefit, I can't stand how wide the iPhone pro max line is, whereas the Sammys are too comfortable in the hand. giggiddy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus and 5105973
These solid state buttons were expected to be pressure sensitive, not capacitive like the home button.
You can’t sense pressure without movement. And if you have movement you can’t be ‘solid state’.
 
Guys, don't fall for this feature. Because I fell for it.

Nearly everything I take with my 14 Pro ends up being 12 Megapixels. You don't decide.

The use cases where it will be 48 Megapixels are almost non-existent. You have to be outside, during the summer, on a non-cloudy day, and not under a shadow.
not even available for 3rd party apps to shoot on 48mP?
 
Guys, don't fall for this feature. Because I fell for it.

Nearly everything I take with my 14 Pro ends up being 12 Megapixels. You don't decide.

The use cases where it will be 48 Megapixels are almost non-existent. You have to be outside, during the summer, on a non-cloudy day, and not under a shadow.
It isn't truly 48 Mpixel because of the lens' limitations and the quad Bayer sensor. After my comparing it to my Nokia 808 (the 42 Mpixel normal Bayer 808 is a little bit better mostly because it's not quad Bayer), I bet it's effectively around 30-35 Mpixels. However, this resolution advantage is present even indoors, except for low light when the ISO needs to be increased.
 
iPhone Mini user - what I'm most interested in is if the smaller bezels on the phone equate to a smaller device footprint, and if they can lighten up on the weight of the device. I love my Mini, there's just a few things like the battery and macro lens that make me want to upgrade. But dang the size of the Mini is perfect, will be hard to give up!
 
Useless money spent on useless features.
90hz display or high frequency Pwm OLED or even a 5.8 mini pro would do better than whatever 48mp dumbass camera
 
No. Every Apple product gets better with every categorical refinement. You always get more when you update to the latest and greatest product experience from Apple.
You're not getting more product for less money though, just incremental improvements with an annual price increase. The mobile phone product market is at such a mature stage, the frequency in upgrades has dropped off compared to say 2008-2014 during the smartphone feature race where vast improvements came every single year. Back then retail pricing was considerably more static then we see now too. Sorry I thought you were being sarcastic with what looked like a copy and paste out of the Apple Marketing manual. I can see by your second sentence in this reply that I was mistaken lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menneisyys2
You’re right and it seems to be a trap smartphone users now are falling into much like the digital camera crowd did back in 2004.
Exactly. I think there was this discussion those days about the pro phones. no photograph will use a iphone for business pics. same here. 200 megapix will make the pic just bigger, no better. Apple proofed already few times, that they'r phones are no1 (4 personal use). 💪
 
Whatever happened to the megapixel myth?

Sure, Apple campaigned against the megahertz myth in the 1990s. But what does the average user gain when more megapixels actually can mean larger file sizes?

Why does anyone really care about more MPs? They do NOT assure better quality. Ultimately, the sensor size may have more value than pixel density.

Even so, I'm tired of my 128GB phone running out of storage, largely due to videos, photos and even voice memos (and AppleOne isn't worth the added cost - and too limited IMO for photo and video storage anyway).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.