Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Probably for waterproofing. So not for nothing. Doesn't mean it is an important feature for everyone, but it isn't an example of 'change for changes sake' I don't think, since there IS a likely reason.

I do like that MUTE could become just another setting I can adjust like VOLUME now. Or even with Siri. (Probably.)

This is the debate that has been had with cars. Can’t have something with a physical indicator of a setting that’s changed by software.

Seems there’s been a lot of pushback there as well and some cars even went back to physical controls.
 
Completely agree. My guess is that they'll add some sort of indicator, like an always-on mini OLED-display to the top of the button that turns that safety orange color when mute.

Which, as someone who keeps that switch on the vast majority of the time, will be annoying.
 
I understand everyone has a different opinion, but I've never really liked the iPhone ringer switch. I'd rather be able to automate its function, such as having ringer on only at home or similar. (Via connecting to my wifi, or location) Since its a physical switch with two physical states you can't mess with the setting in software.

I do wonder if they'll utilize a similar tech to the macbook trackpad, where a gentle press would give it some signal as to its current state (different vibration pattern or something) to tell you if it is currently silent or on ringer, and a hard press would actually toggle it.
 
I too wonder how this will work with a protective case (as the majority of us use). I would rather see a thicker phone (i.e. loose the camera bump for God’s sake) and give us additional battery, ram, whatever capacity! Anyone else agree?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ac1d 8urn
how many people actually keep their iphone NOT on mute? It goes on mute for me the day I get it and doesn’t go off of mute.

I could be an outlier but a ringing phone or a text sound is among the most annoying things that people do in public.
I leave it off mute except when I am in meetings that would be disturbed. I also like the orange color to remind me to put it back to unmute after I leave meeting. I tend to forget I turned on and then start missing things but then see the orange color and am reminded to unmute
 
One benefit to a mute button over a switch is the ability to reassign it to something else if you don't need use mute. It'd make a pretty good shutter button for the camera.
I agree. I don't like having to touch my iPhone's screen for every photo I take. I'd rather use an action button that only needs to be tapped gently to get the pic I want.
 
Well it’s just a render so hopefully it’s completely incorrect.

But, it does seem to mirror the design of the current MBP which is a big step backward. These new designs are very regressive and come across as very cheap.

Don’t get me wrong the new MBP has an incredible screen, keyboard and internals, but the external design looks very cheap compared to the previous unibody chiseled from one slab design.

Similarly the iPhone 13/14 somehow got the mix of flat and round so perfect that it also comes across as chiseled from one block of pure quality.

This render comes across as some very cheap pieced together mess. Although I’m sure it would have world class screen and responsiveness.

Capacitive buttons on the other hand would be very cool as long as they are dead perfect in their responsiveness.

Let’s just pray the renders are all wrong.
 
Last edited:
I understand this can be upsetting for some long time iPhone users. My first iPhone was the iPhone 3G and I love the ring/silent switch because it’s so convenient!!

Some pros I can think of:
  • Customisable button. E.g open camera
  • Change ring/silent in control centre like the iPad
  • Use Focus mode to control ring/silent. E.g silent in work mode
I don’t know how I feel about this yet and no doubt we will all get over it eventually. I trust Apple :)
 
Last edited:
CultofMac has posted a nice opinion-based article. Those that are in doubt! It’s worth checking out.

8714FA11-7033-4DDE-83F0-7F6662748484.jpeg


 
What's so big deal about these changes?
Apple making these changes just for the sake of it?
Very lazy effort, Apple.
 
Instead of turning the mute switch into a button, they could have focused on bringing the Dynamic Island’s cutouts closer to the top of the screen, notch-like style.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cihag
With the phone still in my pocket I often find myself flipping the switch twice to feel it vibrate confirming the mute. That could be the same with a button.
With the button you can also activate it accidentally. Also how good will all these buttons work with the gloves, wet hands etc?

I don't know, I just like classic tactile controls. Don't fix what is not broken. I came across android phones with unified volume button and it was worse than separate volume buttons. Those metallic buttons always felt great and expensive on the iPhone.
 
This is the debate that has been had with cars. Can’t have something with a physical indicator of a setting that’s changed by software.

Seems there’s been a lot of pushback there as well and some cars even went back to physical controls.
In cars, response time and tactile feel is critical. You don’t want to be distracted with an unresponsive capacitive button when you’re driving (and let’s face it, all these companies always cheapen out on the CPU/SoC for embedded computers, resulting in laggy and unresponsive UI). Tactility and instant feedback is the holy grail.

The physical mute switch on the iPhone is ingenious. It’s very simply, almost anyone understands it, and it’s immediate. Changing it into a non-descript button with no direct feedback (the feedback is presumable done by other things) is confusing, and it’s against good design or usability.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.