Do you expect integrity from $3 trillion companies?You don't care about integrity? That's unfortunate, and I say that very mildly.
I’m not sure you could even get close to 1 billion without losing some…
Do you expect integrity from $3 trillion companies?You don't care about integrity? That's unfortunate, and I say that very mildly.
I doubt Apple would do it if the legislation didn’t allow it.If this is true, hopefully the EU shuts it down. This is obviously not what their legislation meant.
How would they cripple your phone? Would charging be any different than what you have now?So all usb-c cables I have now will be crippled for my iPhone if I decide to upgrade. Great. All the more reason to stick with my iPhone 14 Pro Max.
It might technically be allowed, but everybody involved here knows that isn’t what the legislation’s intent was. I hope they amend it to make this illegal in the future.I doubt Apple would do it if the legislation didn’t allow it.
The way people are freaking out you’d think MFi was the biggest revenue driver on Apple’s P&L. In actuality it’s probably a rounding error.This certainly seems like something that Apple would do but it doesn’t make sense:
(1) usb c is fully unlocked on the iPads (although speed limited on some models)
(2) the MFi program is such a small money maker for Apple v. Every other product (I think I read it’s like 1/2 of a percent) - seems silly to burn good will and potential new iPhone purchases for such a small amount of money that will, quite frankly not change when switching to USB-C. It’s not like generic lighting cable can’t be found literally everywhere (maybe even more places than USB-C) - the people who buy MFi stuff will still keep buying it whether there is a feature advantage or not. Personally I buy MFi stuff because I do not want my phone to explode.
Just seems like a stupid move if true. Or, perhaps, we only have a piece of the picture.
... and yet Apple seems (allegeldy) hellbent on keeping the program running.In actuality it’s probably a rounding error.
And this they spend millions of dollars on perfecting.
Nothing beats Apple when it comes to how cheap they can be to their customers.
Then they say stuff like “we are always listening to our users”.
Only if their users stop buying their products will they listen.
Until then they are always listening to their investors.
If it’s working why wouldn’t they? I’m curious what kind of cables people are buying. I only buy cables and power adapters from companies I know are reputable, like Anker. Those companies are also MFi certified. I’d be too afraid to buy some cheap thing on Amazon.... and yet Apple seems (allegeldy) hellbent on keeping the program running.
The EU legislators have to tread carefully because private companies can and will challenge onerous regulations. The EU courts might agree it is reasonable to mandate a certain port shape and size, but might not agree that the electrical protocols also need to be mandated as that prevents private companies from being able to differentiate their products from one other another and is a restraint on allowing the free market from choosing what products and features are desirable.It might technically be allowed, but everybody involved here knows that isn’t what the legislation’s intent was. I hope they amend it to make this illegal in the future.
Correct. It's not simply an issue I'm going to be concerned about.You don't care about integrity? That's unfortunate, and I say that very mildly.
Mac and Ipad are niche compared to iphone, is my guess.Is it really an opinion to say "throttling USB-C cables on the iPhone is a bad idea when the Mac and iPad doesn't do that?"
Apple's actions suggest otherwise. If it weren't important to Apple, they would have switched to USB-C a half-decade ago and conformed their own devices to the industry standard like everyone else.The way people are freaking out you’d think MFi was the biggest revenue driver on Apple’s P&L. In actuality it’s probably a rounding error.
We'll have to wait and see, and I get what you are saying. For example if the iphone 15 can support charging with 100 watts, but only with an MFI cable, it could be deemed they are crippling those cables....unless there is a reason to force the use of mfi which we are not aware of.Let’s see what happens in practise as we are at rumour stage.
But if they are deliberately forcing cables which are fully compliant with the standard to run below their maximum certified data speed and power deliver capacity while the device does support those speeds and capacities, this is absolutely crippling those cables.
My understanding of that article is that this is what Macrumours is claiming they are planning to do.
There’s no technical reason for it at all. It’s all about control, and revenue. And that’s fine. Let the free market decide if they want that or not. If they don’t, people won’t buy iPhones or apple cables.Apple's actions suggest otherwise. If it weren't important to Apple, they would have switched to USB-C a half-decade ago and conformed their own devices to the industry standard like everyone else.
There is no valid technical reason for this move, despite whatever Apple is trying to sell you.
I doubt there’ll be a cable in the box. The whole point of the legislation is to make it so no cables or charging bricks are included as you use your existing cables.As long as Apple still includes the USB-C cable in the box, it is a non-issue for most consumers. Besides, Mfi chip has been reverse engineered by the Chinese that there are so many cheap cables with it nowadays.
Proprietary stuff on top USB-C is nothing new. Pretty much each Chinese OEM has their own proprietary fast charging tech that only works with their specific cable and chargers on top of USB-C.This is insane. USB-C ports on the Macbooks and iPads don't have these restrictions, why would the iPhones need them?
I really hope Apple is slapped down by the EU courts if they decide to do this. Enough is freaking enough.
Mac and Ipad are niche compared to iphone, is my guess.
The entire point of the legislation was to make this standardized. There is no function in differentiating devices based on charge information using proprietary systems. This would create mountains of pointless e-waste. Any USB-C cable ever produced up to this point will be unable to charge the iPhone at full speed for no reason.The EU legislators have to tread carefully because private companies can and will challenge onerous regulations. The EU courts might agree it is reasonable to mandate a certain port shape and size, but might not agree that the electrical protocols also need to be mandated as that prevents private companies from being able to differentiate their products from one other another and is a restraint on allowing the free market from choosing what products and features are desirable.
Hey buddy, how many iphones are in active use? How many ipads? How many Macs? Whats the percentage of iphones to the total? Ipads to the total? If the percentage is small enough, would that be considered niche?Mac and iPad "niche." Yeah you keep reaching buddy.
![]()
Report: Mac and iPad still dominating worldwide PC market in Q1 2022 - 9to5Mac
In Q1 2022, the worldwide PC and tablet shipments fell 3% annually, but Apple is still reigning with its Mac and iPad lineups.9to5mac.com
![]()
Apple now totally dominates ARM-based PC market thanks to M1
ARM-powered machines now represent almost 10% of the whole PC marketwww.techradar.com
Do they make as much money as the iPhone? Obviously no. Are they "niche?" Also no.
Well, it's not new. I would say it's more d-baggy because it's a universal standard port.... but they already throttle wireless charging which is also open.There's a limit Apple and frankly they crossed it many times.
But this is over the top. Silly or stupid is what I use to describe it.
I don’t think that will be the case. iPhones already support USB-PD. USB-C cables that properly support USB-PD already requires certain handshake between the charger, cable, and device, so it’s nothing new.The entire point of the legislation was to make this standardized. There is no function in differentiating devices based on charge information using proprietary systems. This would create mountains of pointless e-waste. Any USB-C cable ever produced up to this point will be unable to charge the iPhone at full speed for no reason.
Hey buddy, how many iphones are in active use? How many ipads? How many Macs? Whats the percentage of iphones to the total? Ipads to the total? If the percentage is small enough, would that be considered niche?