Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t think that will be the case. iPhones already support USB-PD. USB-C cables that properly support USB-PD already requires certain handshake between the charger, cable, and device, so it’s nothing new.
The handshake is part of the standard which every device ever made with USB C already supports. Apple adding their own makes nothing but e-waste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icwhatudidthere
The way people are freaking out you’d think MFi was the biggest revenue driver on Apple’s P&L. In actuality it’s probably a rounding error.
Absolutely amazing. People just love to be outraged about something. Even if that something is an unproven rumor. LOL. These rumors are a dime a dozen these days (this statement gets better with time, lol).

OMG IM TOTALLY QUITTING APPLE NOW, IT IS THE WORST COMPANY ON THE EARTH, NO OTHER COMPANY EVEN DOES 1/1000th WHAT APPLE DOES. SCUMBAG TIMMY COOK. APPLE IS DOOMED FOR SURE NOW.

At least it's driving Macrumors clicks and making Macrumors $. Good grief.
 
We had to know there was a hook to this. No way the EU was going to force Apple to give up all the accessory money they make from Lightning cables and move to USB-C without any of us paying the toll.
Haha, no worries, EU have put this requirement on apple and Every manufacturer must support USB Power-delivery 3.0 as a backup if the manufacturer’s proprietary charging standards isn’t supported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
The handshake is part of the standard which every device ever made with USB C already supports. Apple adding their own makes nothing but e-waste.
Well, even if this were true, I doubt Apple’s addition would change anything, unless Apple introduces their own faster proprietary charging (which all the Chinese OEMs are doing). But the device itself will still be USB-PD compliant and works with proper USB-PD cables. Worst come to worst, he Mfi chip has been reverse engineered by the Chinese, and there will be plenty of cheap cables hat would work just fine.

I wouldn’t be too paranoid over this rumor. Apple has other cow to milk, aka MagSafe.
 
The silver lining is that this might help address the issue around so many dodgy USB-C cables. I can totally see non-Apple users buying them because they know the cable would be made to spec.

as for making money on this? Yeah that blows. Maybe spin off the MFi program into a non-profit entity that exists on its own and funds itself through those fees…
 
Wait so you're saying all this outrage is completely pointless because PD will have to be supported? LOL
Exactly. And I doubt this rumor is valid anyway. Apple doesn’t really have solid reason when they already put plain USB-PD on their MacBooks and iPads. Besides, they already have a new cow to milk, MagSafe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Well, even if this were true, I doubt Apple’s addition would change anything, unless Apple introduces their own faster proprietary charging (which all the Chinese OEMs are doing). But the device itself will still be USB-PD compliant and works with proper USB-PD cables. Worst come to worst, he Mfi chip has been reverse engineered by the Chinese, and there will be plenty of cheap cables hat would work just fine.

I wouldn’t be too paranoid over this rumor. Apple has other cow to milk, aka MagSafe.
Just way I think - the way Apple's quarterly earning statements point at - there's a LOT bigger cash cows it's milking... Like others have posted, cables are an afterthought, a rounding error. Services alone are exploding.

But your point stands. MagSafe alone most likely makes Apple exponentially more $ than this move would. lol.
 
It's not as crazy as people think. Reason: the innumerable standards from USB-IF with the USB Type C connector that confuse the heck out of everyone. Apple may be looking for cables that have a STRICT adherence to the USB-IF standard, which could actually save a lot of grief.
 
Of course you can use your existing cables, are you not able to read?

The EU will have absolutely nothing to say, because there are no rules on charging speed or transfer speed. Nor will there be, could there be, should there be.

It is quite offending to mean people you disagree with are not able to read.
USB-C is not just about cables but also about accessories.

I quote the first sentence of the article:

"Apple's iPhone 15 series will officially only support USB-C accessories that have been certified by Apple's own Made for iPhone (MFi) program, potentially limiting the functionality of accessories not approved by Apple, an established leaker has now claimed."

First, this paragraph refers to accessories, not cables.

Second, one can expect USB-C compatibility to mean more than just a physical connector shape.
For instance, many people use keyboards with their mobile devices and this sentence implies that they should only expect to work keyboards "that have been certified by Apple's own Made for iPhone (MFi) program". Not the best news of the day.

Third, charging is not only about the cable but also the chargers. This rumor casts some doubt on what will happen with a USB-C compliant but not "MFI certified" charger. Not so good either

Finally, the whole article is based on rumors, so we cannot be sure quite yet what will happen: it is urgent to wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Wonderful idea ! USB-B shaped connector that is not USB-C, since it does not have regular USB-C compatibility.

I would almost laugh if the EU rules this does not count as USB-C support since you cannot use your existing USB-C charger and expect it to work unless it is "Apple certified".
You can still use it for standard charging.
 
Just way I think - the way Apple's quarterly earning statements point at - there's a LOT bigger cash cows it's milking... Like others have posted, cables are an afterthought, a rounding error. Services alone are exploding.

But your point stands. MagSafe alone most likely makes Apple exponentially more $ than this move would. lol.
This is why I think this rumor won’t come to fruition. Why should Apple spend money doing this chip, when they themselves will be going wireless, and MagSafe already offers more sales through the various accessories. Also, all those effort will be reverse engineered by the Chinese within a short time, just like the current Mfi chip. It probably not cost effective, and the current Apple prefers cost cutting whenever possible to maximize profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Absolutely amazing. People just love to be outraged about something. Even if that something is an unproven rumor. LOL. These rumors are a dime a dozen these days (this statement gets better with time, lol).

OMG IM TOTALLY QUITTING APPLE NOW, IT IS THE WORST COMPANY ON THE EARTH, NO OTHER COMPANY EVEN DOES 1/1000th WHAT APPLE DOES. SCUMBAG TIMMY COOK. APPLE IS DOOMED FOR SURE NOW.

At least it's driving Macrumors clicks and making Macrumors $. Good grief.

Yeah... sadly it's always a race to the bottom with outrage. Helps people start their day feeling better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Tell me again how removing the charging cable from the phone box will help the environment? Because this certainly won't.
this is the first ever mention of them removing the cable from the box that I’ve heard.
Obviously their ultimate goal is to ship the phone with absolutely nothing in the smallest box possible, but… Apple isn’t stupid.
Also, I could be wrong, but there are several countries where including a charger with a mobile device is pretty much required.
So I don’t think they are quite ready to make that step just yet, especially since this will be the *first* iPhone with a Newport in 11 years.
 
The entire point of the legislation was to make this standardized. There is no function in differentiating devices based on charge information using proprietary systems. This would create mountains of pointless e-waste. Any USB-C cable ever produced up to this point will be unable to charge the iPhone at full speed for no reason.
I think the important point is that any USBC will charge the iPhone.
 
So if, for instance, one plugged-in an existing USB-C storage device from a reputable brand like Belkin, the transfer speed would be limited because it doesn’t have an MFI chip in it?
Yes. I would still expect Belkin to make MFI compliant USB-C cables tho. They will simply have both versions available eventually, for different retail vendors/pegs.
 
No. But I would expect an individual like @I7guy to have some integrity; not a lot to ask for from the general public / consumers.
I mean… But here’s the thing.
Did anyone for a second *not* expect something like this? Especially for a standard as messy as USB-C?
There’s USB 2.0 cables, 3.0 cables, 3.1 cables, thunderbolt cables, cables that can output video, cables that can’t output video, cables that can fast charge, cables that can’t fast charge…
Of course Apple was going to release their own cable that works the best with their own devices.
They always have, even back in the day.
First of all, there have been absolutely no rumors saying that the iPhone 15 will not come without a cable.
When they remove the headphones from the box, it was reported on endlessly.
When they removed the wall adapter from the box, it was reported on even more, long before that phone released.
But absolutely nothing when it comes to not including a cable in the box.
So the safe assumption is that they will include a cable in the box of every iPhone 15 or 15 Pro, and that cable will be made by Apple.
There’s absolutely nothing new here, cheap three dollar cables you can buy at gas stations are crappier than Apple’s.
There’s nothing new, there’s nothing groundbreaking, there’s nothing really that controversial about this story.
If you use high-quality cables, you’ll get a high-quality experience.
If you use low quality cables that you can find cheaply… They probably won’t perform as well. Just like third-party lightning cables, the phone will probably charge slower, you’ll probably get an annoying warning every couple of days and you’ll probably be totally and completely restricted to 2.0 speeds.
But it’s really not that big of a deal, people who care about fast charging and fast transfer speeds already are going to have a cable that supports all that, the one that comes in the box.
If they need a new cable, it’s pretty common sense that $30 cables are gonna perform better than three dollar cables.
Sure, Apple obviously has selfish reasons for doing this. Of course they do, they’re a corporation, they’re going to do things like this.
But the actual effect it will have on people is pretty much zero, because 95%… No, I’ll go even higher, 98% of people buying these phones are just going to use the cable that’s included.
 
Second, one can expect USB-C compatibility to mean more than just a physical connector shape.

Basically compatibility and functionality will be there. Advanced functionality will require approved cables/accessories, so they don't destroy your iPhone.

It's really ridiculous to assume otherwise.
 
This was me from four months ago, and everyone said I was insane:
“Apple has this pop-up in iOS, it sounds a little something like this:
“This accessory cannot be verified.”

There’s more to it but you get the point.
I fully expect this pop-up to quickly become very common when people pick up their new iPhones, stick some $1.50 USB-C cable that came with some random gadget into their iPhone and it doesn’t like it.
I fully expect Apple to do everything in their power to make sure you are using their USB-C cables, and only their USB-C cables.”
Funny to see that this actually might come to fruition.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.