Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 15's USB-C Port: 4.5W Charging for Accessories, USB 3.2 Gen 2 for Pro Models, and More
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
How much more will it cost Apple (or the buyer since that's ultimately who will end up paying for it) to include a higher spec USB cable instead of one that can only do USB 2 speeds? I'm going to say less than $5.
Sounds faulty - you should take it to an Apple Store before the warranty runs out. I wouldn’t be surprised if you get a shiny new replacement (if my experience with Apple support is anything to go by), so worth the effort (be super nice about it).
Last edited:
It won’t cost them much, but if it’s something that few people will take advantage of, it’s a waste of money. It’s the same way it’s a waste of money to put charging bricks and headphones in the box. The best solution long term is to simply take the cable out of the box.
They can't be serious. They sell you a phone that costs at least $999 and it comes with a cable that just supports 5% of the transfer speed. It seems they did not understand the purpose of the EU law. The idea was that you need less cables and chargers. So what Apple did is even worse than not supplying a cable at all.
How is that possible if the regular iPhones only support USB 2 speeds? 4K@60Hz requires double-digit Gbps (DisplayPort 1.2 HBR2 mode).
Now they have something to boast about in the future: "The new ultra shiny pro iphone 16 that now supports USB 3 transfer speeds". And you will get that just for a couple hundreds of dollars.
The supplied cable will charge the iPhone fine.
These are Pro and Pro Max models. They should come with what the user needs to use the Pro/Pro Max features.
This is as bad as Apple putting 8GB memory on their MacBook Pro. Or do you believe more than 8GB is a waste of money and few people would take advantage of anything beyond the 8GB?
This is probably Apple's reasoning for putting in slower SSD's for certain Macs... anything faster is a waste of money and also something that few people will take advantage of. Totally makes sense now.
New 256GB Mac Mini and 512GB MacBook Pro Have Slower SSD Speeds Than Previous Models
While the new Mac mini with the M2 chip has a lower $599 starting price, the base model with 256GB of storage has slower SSD read and write...
www.macrumors.com
Base Model MacBook Air With M2 Chip Has Slower SSD Speeds in Benchmarks
The first embargoed reviews of the new MacBook Air with the M2 chip have now been published. One notable detail confirmed by The Verge is that the...
www.macrumors.com
15-Inch MacBook Air With 256GB Storage Has Slower SSD Speeds Than Higher-Capacity Models
As expected, the 15-inch MacBook Air with 256GB of storage is equipped with a single NAND chip, according to YouTube channel Max Tech. This will...
www.macrumors.com
That’s what Airplay is for. Works absolutely great from my phone to my
LG TV for instance. Wirelessly. Instantly. No mess with stupid cables.
I personally have no clue what all this sudden fuss of wired data transfers is about when Apple just improved Airdrop a lot in iOS/iPadOs 17
Airdrop is brutally fast among all my Apple devices. And it has become much more reliable on large files.
The full usb 3 transfer cable will be thicker, that is probably part of the reason too.
Actually the longer term direction is to remove the cables from the box, the same way some phone manufacturers already have.These are Pro and Pro Max models. They should come with what the user needs to use the Pro/Pro Max features.
This is as bad as Apple putting 8GB memory on their MacBook Pro. Or do you believe more than 8GB is a waste of money and few people would take advantage of anything beyond the 8GB?
This is probably Apple's reasoning for putting in slower SSD's for certain Macs... anything faster is a waste of money and also something that few people will take advantage of. Totally makes sense now.
New 256GB Mac Mini and 512GB MacBook Pro Have Slower SSD Speeds Than Previous Models
While the new Mac mini with the M2 chip has a lower $599 starting price, the base model with 256GB of storage has slower SSD read and write...
Base Model MacBook Air With M2 Chip Has Slower SSD Speeds in Benchmarks
The first embargoed reviews of the new MacBook Air with the M2 chip have now been published. One notable detail confirmed by The Verge is that the...
15-Inch MacBook Air With 256GB Storage Has Slower SSD Speeds Than Higher-Capacity Models
As expected, the 15-inch MacBook Air with 256GB of storage is equipped with a single NAND chip, according to YouTube channel Max Tech. This will...
There shouldn’t be a phone in the box, most people already have phones
"The USB-C cable included with iPhone 15 Pro models supports USB 2 speeds"
Such a PRO thing for Apple to do 🙄 What a joke.
God forbid you include a USB 3 cable is a device that costs $1200.
Such a PRO thing for Apple to do 🙄 What a joke.
God forbid you include a USB 3 cable is a device that costs $1200.
The EU doesn’t say anything about data speeds. It’s only concerned with charging.
Also, most, if not all, of Apple’s Android competitors do the exact same thing.
It’s also really unlikely someone has a TV or display with USB-C input. It’s usually an HDMI in on TVs and monitors. So you would likely use an adapter to get HDMI for most of those anyway.That’s what Airplay is for. Works absolutely great from my phone to my
LG TV for instance. Wirelessly. Instantly. No mess with stupid cables.
I personally have no clue what all this sudden fuss of wired data transfers is about when Apple just improved Airdrop a lot in iOS/iPadOs 17
Airdrop is brutally fast among all my Apple devices. And it has become much more reliable on large files.
That is true, I can attest that Superspeed cables are thicker. Makes it harder to coil up the cable to put into a bag. And Apple’s Thunderbolt cables are really thick too. Apple doesn’t even make Superspeed non-Thunderbolt cables. They seem to be all-in on Thunderbolt.
I'm guessing thicker = heavier?
Having to transport all that extra weight means more fuel will be burned, and that's bad for the environment.
Thanks Apple for watching out for the environment. Clearly, including a slower USB 2.0 cable instead of a USB 3.2 cable was the right call.
See below.
The USB Type-C connector allows for up to four high-speed differential pairs, which can be allocated to different protocols. For example, you could implement 5Gbps or 10Gbps SuperSpeed USB using two of the pairs and use the other two for dual-lane DisplayPort. Alternatively, you could have all four pairs used for quad-lane DisplayPort to drive high-resolution or high refresh rate displays.
Notably, there are dedicated USB 2.0 data lines on the USB Type-C connector that are always available, no matter the configuration of the high-speed differential pairs.
So in this case Apple just had to connect their existing USB 2.0 interface to those dedicated pins and run the new DisplayPort interface to the high-speed differential pairs.
For the 15 Pro models, it may actually more complicated since they might need to add multiplexers to switch the differential pair lines between the SuperSpeed interface and the DisplayPort interface as appropriate.
This picture shows the USB Type-C pinout. The blue TX and RX pins are the high-speed differential pairs, and the green D+/D- pins are the USB 2.0 lines.
The Pro models have a USB3 controller on the chip. Regular 15 models do not have that.
I agree it's a bit silly.
My bigger concern is honestly the 4.5W limit, which is probably low enough to stop you plugging a usb c ssd straight in for recording? i.e. does external recording require you to have a powered hub.
My bigger concern is honestly the 4.5W limit, which is probably low enough to stop you plugging a usb c ssd straight in for recording? i.e. does external recording require you to have a powered hub.
Both Pro and non-Pro models support 4K@60Hz via DisplayPort. (See my comment above)
Which does not come from usb 3 controller though, that comes from display port controller, as you said.
I plan to use the very old plug with a USB-A to USB-C cable to not kill the battery as fast as I always did using wireless charging or fast charging on my 12 PM. Does that make sense? Like as long as it’s 100% when I wake up, I don’t care how long it takes.
For times like on vacation I’d still use fast charging of course
—-
Also, MR mentioned USB-C to USB-A cable for certain cars to use wired CarPlay. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? USB-A to USB-C? Normally you mention „out“ first?
For times like on vacation I’d still use fast charging of course
—-
Also, MR mentioned USB-C to USB-A cable for certain cars to use wired CarPlay. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? USB-A to USB-C? Normally you mention „out“ first?
Yes, my point was that it’s possible for the USB-C port to support 4K at 60 Hz via DisplayPort while only having USB 2 data speeds.
Absolutely. The USBC port itself is just a connector, it has no specific functionality itself.