Love the Torras cases! Picked up the ultra-thin pro max case off Amazon.I bought/received a TORRA's case and it did come with a cutout
Love the Torras cases! Picked up the ultra-thin pro max case off Amazon.I bought/received a TORRA's case and it did come with a cutout
Seems strange, since virtually every camera in the history of cameras has had a shutter button you had to physically press to take pictures. If there was no button you still have to physically tap on the screen, which to me is even more awkward. It sounds like the error exists at the camera holder's end.I keep reading using that new camera shutter causes blurry pics from when you have to physically press the button it causes the phone to move a bit and produce blurrier pics than usual.
Seems strange, since virtually every camera in the history of cameras has had a shutter button you had to physically press to take pictures. If there was no button you still have to physically tap on the screen, which to me is even more awkward. It sounds like the error exists at the camera holder's end.
You make all those points about DSLR but with phones you had to press the screen and move the camera or the volume buttons which require to firm a push to prevent moving the camera. I've not heard people complain about missing focus with their phonesI'd consider holding a modern DSLR and notice the difference. It's lightyears better than what Apple did.
Apple widely missed the simple, precise UX of a DSLR, to my visual review. We can confirm it soon enough with phones in our own hands, but most reviewers have noticed Apple's Camera Control is not intuitive, imprecise, slow to use, and compromises the ergonomics.
- DSLR shutter buttons stick out of the camera. The iPhone 16 button is recessed. DSLR buttons are thus much easier to press.
- DSLR shutter buttons have a rounded side profile (e.g., not flat), meaning even light pressure on the middle will depress it. The iPhone 16 button is flat.
- DSLR shutter buttons are naturally placed above your right index finger when gripping it. The iPhone 16 button is further away than a typical landscape hold → your finger needs a long stretch → reduces your finger precision.
- DSLRs are much heavier. Thus, the "weight" of pressing the shutter is much less likely to move the heavier mass of the DSLR. The iPhone 16 is much lighter. Lighter pushes will shift the phone.
- You grip a DSLR with a far sturdier grip below the shutter button, thus allowing your index finger to push against your thick palm. In the iPhone 16, there is no weight on the opposite side.
This definitely feels like a Gen1 test. Maybe in 2-3 generations, we'll have "Camera Control with Touch ID" that has better placement and better UX, e.g.,
iPhone 6 launched with Touch ID Gen1.
iPhone 6S launched with Touch ID Gen2.
iPhone 7 launched with a capacitive button & Touch ID.
I'd consider holding a modern DSLR and notice the difference. It's lightyears better than what Apple did.
Apple widely missed the simple, precise UX of a DSLR, to my visual review. We can confirm it soon enough with phones in our own hands, but most reviewers have noticed Apple's Camera Control is not intuitive, imprecise, slow to use, and compromises the ergonomics.
- DSLR shutter buttons stick out of the camera. The iPhone 16 button is recessed. DSLR buttons are thus much easier to press.
- DSLR shutter buttons have a rounded side profile (e.g., not flat), meaning even light pressure on the middle will depress it. The iPhone 16 button is flat.
- DSLR shutter buttons are naturally placed above your right index finger when gripping it. The iPhone 16 button is further away than a typical landscape hold → your finger needs a long stretch → reduces your finger precision.
- DSLRs are much heavier. Thus, the "weight" of pressing the shutter is much less likely to move the heavier mass of the DSLR. The iPhone 16 is much lighter. Lighter pushes will shift the phone.
- You grip a DSLR with a far sturdier grip below the shutter button, thus allowing your index finger to push against your thick palm. In the iPhone 16, there is no weight on the opposite side.
All slim cases, any rugged cases cover the camera control button?With the new phones…Have you guys seen the cases that have just a cut out for camera control??? Some of those cases look so ugly.
I’ve only found a couple with the camera control cover. Apples clear case…a clear case from spigen…the lumen case from Otterbox which I got. And a clear supcase. These are the two that I bought along with my preordered phone. Your thoughts on the full cutout or a cover? And what you picked? Prefer?
The last picture is the new OtterBox symmetry. I just can’t stand that cut out.
Being right on the side and flush, I accidentally press the button all. the. time. I think I've done it 10 times since I got the phone an hour and a half ago. I'm sure I'll learn not to push there, but LOTs of accidental presses.
Oh good idea. I don't know that I'm going to have a problem with that, but it's good to know there's a fix.There is a switch in camera settings to make double press start camera.
Would recommend changing to that. At least some accidental starting of camera stops.
I agree that Apple case seems best regarding the button right now.
Is there any good feedback on how the different cc cutouts are working or not working well?
I am using the apple silicon case until
the Ryan London arrives. Obviously the apple case works fine and it actually feels quite now. It’s the first time I’ve used silicon. I always buy leather.
Wondering how those oval cutout cases are doing as for ease of use for the cc button?
Unless Otterbox or another well known rugged case adds one first, I'm waiting for the Spigen Tough Armor T AI (Magfit + Camera Control). Looks pretty rugged and shows a similar camera control button as the Apple case. It also looks like the only truly rugged case that shows a camera control button built in rather than a cut out or hole.All slim cases, any rugged cases cover the camera control button?
Sorry I didn’t see it first. Any further info on the hole cutouts? Is it harder to press the recessed button with the case adding even more separation?Um, my post 4 before yours?
Thanks for sharing this! Super helpful!There is a switch in camera settings to make double press start camera.
Would recommend changing to that. At least some accidental starting of camera stops.
I agree that Apple case seems best regarding the button right now.
I don't think it bothers as many people as you think. I dislike the Apple cases and a cutout is not enough to get me to go back to them. My favorite third party cases have cutouts and I'm happily using them.Also at this time apple silicone case is the best case right now simply because it has the camera control cover which is way better than having a cutout. In the past I use to get souvenir cases but this year it’s a total disappointment like other cases because the cutout feels so weird. I expect most cases to adopt the camera cover option eventually in the next few weeks. I just wish apple would work with more vendors prior to release so that people have more options.
Thanks for this. I've been going caseless on my 14 Pro and now my Desert 16 Pro, but this is a nice compromise to get a little protection but still show the titanium sides (which is the best part of the Desert color). And the Rustic Brown back should look great.Magnetic Leather Back- iPhone 16 Pro Max | Black | Horween | MagSafe | NOMAD®
Ultra-thin and precision-cut, the Magnetic Leather Back for iPhone 16 Pro Max enhances your phone's look while maintaining its original feel. Made with ...nomadgoods.com
I picked up this since the only thing I need covered is the back so I don't scratch it up when I put it on my desk. I went naked with the 15 Pro and it was fine, but would like a little bit of scuff protection.