No they don't.They need space for the FaceID components if it's really that thin, so housing them in there as well makes sense. Looks like a Pixel clone tho lol.
Look at iPad Pro. Even thinner, and it encompasses faceid.
No they don't.They need space for the FaceID components if it's really that thin, so housing them in there as well makes sense. Looks like a Pixel clone tho lol.
Exactly. This is why the camera bump will be this horizontal hump for the entire lineup.This. Specifically, because the FaceId sensors and the front facing camera for the under-screen implementation will both need to be bigger in order to maintain quality levels... and the elongated camera bump will more effectively accommodate them.
the only difference is how big you see the image on the screen. The iPhone one would su*k too if the screen was 10 inches.The iPad front cameras are terrible compared to the iPhone. Center stage forces an ultra wide camera that’s terribly grainy
Plus no more woble!I personally like the bar design; if nothing else, it would make it easier to read your phone when it's on a table by elevating the top part a bit.![]()
Is anyone asking for thinner phones?
Finally!Apple Inc: Shareholders get to feed their families.
And no wobbleI personally like the bar design; if nothing else, it would make it easier to read your phone when it's on a table by elevating the top part a bit.![]()
That could work, and if this horizontal camera cartouche makes it to the multi-camera iPhone 17 models, it would also allow people who for some reason insist on shooting in portrait mode to also shoot in spatial mode, but the tradeoff is that the "viewfinder" view in the camera app while shooting in landscape mode with the iPhone held vertically will be much smaller, squeezed into the comparatively narrow width of the display, than when the iPhone is held in landscape orientation. I don't think Apple will show the viewfinder view, when the iPhone is held vertically and the user is shooting in landscape mode, in true landscape fashion across most of the display, since it would be rotated 90 degrees and would look weird.One could conceptually hold this phone portrait to shoot landscape to avoid that problem....
In software prompt, let user choose if they want to capture a portrait video or a landscape or spatial video. In all cases, they hold the phone in portrait.
Good catch. If these are real, it implies this design might be for both the Air, and at least one other model.In case it’s not obvious, these are two different sizes. So it’s not just the iPhone Air.
LOL, that could be the whole problem right there. Like you say, Majin Bu's tweet says nothing about these case prototypes as possibly being for the Air.the tweet is pretty clear that this is "iPhone 17" however this article is showing it as "17 air". now everyone in the comments is misled and confused.
The only other one that makes sense is the regular iPhone 17. The Pros surely will have more lenses.Good catch. If these are real, it implies this design might be for both the Air, and at least one other model.
I guess one could argue this would be good in that it'd lie tilted slightly up for potentially a bit easier viewing, without rocking.
I agree with you to a degree. Changing the CEO can be a risky move, as it could potentially damage a company’s reputation. Just look at Intel, for example. I'd keep Tim.Tim needs to go ASAP. They need some fresh blood in this company and someone with the same spirit Jobs had when it comes to minimizing product lines. The iPad lineup is a confusing mess. The iPhone lineup is quickly becoming the same. Keep it simple you idiots. It should be
iPad
iPad Pro
iPhone
iPhone Pro
Apple Watch
Apple Watch Pro (Replaces retarded ‘Ultra’ moniker)
Macbook
MacBook Pro
Mac Mini
Mac Mini Pro (Replaces Mac Studio)
iMac
iMac Pro
I don’t understand why this is so hard. What are they even doing over there in that space ship? And don’t even get me started on the state of software lately.
Better margins, only one camera lens instead of 3.Looks like a pixel knockoff…
Honestly, other than marketing what’s the point in an iPhone Air?
I can see that would be nice, but we probably won't get iPhones like that again any time soon, at least not until metalenses become commercially viable for phones. These have nano-scale patterns etched into them which bend, focus, and filter light similar to traditional lenses, but much thinner.I hate that iPhones lie slightly tilted up
it's a weird personally neurosis to be sure
I'm happy to admit that
but I'd really like my iPhone to just sit flat on the table