Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
He said that Apple was still deciding on 8GB or 12GB of RAM for the iPhone 17 base model at that time, and if Pu's information is accurate, the company has settled on 8GB for the device.
Penny pinching. Literally the only reason I can think of why Apple settled with 8gb is that 12 would’ve given it a longer lifespan which means people upgrading less often
 
Sometimes, when I pick up my iPhone, I accidentally "do something" to the interface. It can be anything from activating the camera to turning the volume all the way to making all the icons jiggle.
I understand your frustration and I sympathize, but the fact is that just because you don’t know what you did doesn’t mean the phone responded errantly. Sounds to me like user error or ignorance of certain features. Now that you know what triggered it, you can stop doing it.
 
Pathetic if true. Apple really need to put more effort or it’ll be obliterated by the competition. The reality distortion field is dissipating and that’s the only thing that let it go away with such underwhelming ‘upgrades’ in the past.
 
I wonder if this has to do with making the chips for the 17 at a TSMC fab in the US in a hedge against tariffs? (The US fabs being stood up lag a generation of process behind the ones in Taiwan)
 
  • Like
Reactions: kolebee
Will be surprised if it is not A19. More important than the chip will be the presence of 120Hz display on the base model. An improvement for the front facing camera will also be nice.
 
How about lowering the price of the iPhone 17, or iPhone A18 as I want it to be called? Even with potential tariffs they could easily keep the price down since most of the hardware hasn't changed except for the LTPO display.
 
Well last time Apple did this with the standard iPhone 15’s those people who bought it did not get apple intelligence because they had the a16 on board 🤨
 
  • Like
Reactions: User 6502
Agreed! It’s enough to make me upgrade from my 14 pro. I would have gone to the 16 had it had ProMotion. Part of me still thinks Apple will cripple the 120hz somehow. I know for me, it would be the last straw waiting for Apple. Some of us don’t need pro cameras or the pro price tag.
90hz screen is a total Apple move. No chance they put ‘ProMotion’ in a base iPhone, Timmy would never stand for that. It wil be gimped, don’t worry.
 
So the regular 17 will basicially be two generations behind the pro for the SOC? The 16 is one generation behind the 16 Pro as it is and is basically using the 15 Pro SOC. At this point either buy a Pro or buy the "e" model.

This is really a slap in the face to customers and it just shows that Apple believes many of its customers don't understand technology.....because they don't.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.