Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So the differences between the 17 and 17 pro will be a rectangular “bar” with one more camera?
 
I hate the weight of the 16 Pro, the 15 Pro's weight is the maximum I want to cary. And yes. 15-20g difference is really noticeable.

If they switch back to aluminium, I hope it will just not surpass the 15 Pro's weight. Unfortunately I think it will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNSN
I think the part going across the back (like Pixel phone) can be great... but I just don't get preserving the triangular layout too. Raised strip with- if necessary- raised lenses in a row at each end, one more camera and flash, etc in-between and wobble is mostly addressed. Not sure why this phone would need the raised platform too. Maybe camera lenses alone hanging off of an even "thinner" body is just too ugly... so disguise that a bit with the platform taking up some of the depth???
 
Last edited:
I vastly prefer steel or titanium for a premium phone. Why would they switch to an inferior material?
Weight would be a serious consideration. My “heavy” 14 Pro with stainless steel is 206g. The 16 Pro even with titanium is almost 200g. It’s possible that the 17 Pro prototype with titanium was getting too close to or hitting 206g. Going back to aluminum may have been Apple’s only option to keep the weight in check.
 
If they do this the likely explanation will be that they will want to widen the weight gap between the Pro and Air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAR
iPhone 17 Air will outsell BOTH Pro models combined.
I think for a lot of people, the decision to get the “Air” over the Pro models will come down to how much of a downgrade the single lens camera is. It might sell well if Apple finds a way to make the camera significantly more capable than the camera on the new SE model. One possible way would be to add a mechanical aperture which would be a first for the iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DefNotAnLLM
In terms of aesthetics alone, it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al. And Ti had coating issues that SS and Al didn't. The only benefit was really weight but they could've just stuck with Al and that would've been lighter than SS too. Just a dumb move by a CEO that isn't a product person.

I'll never forget this post by #Mrkevinfinnerty :

"While Jobs was jousting with the audience Tim was imagining what the margins would be if the new iPod was made out of wood."

It's only a matter of time before we see a plastic iPhone (again).
 
Everything about this phone seems ugly and stupid. How did we go from titanium being a touted selling point to be taken away completely? The 15 Pro was the last sensible phone Apple made without useless bells, whistles, or omissions. Planning to keep it another few years at least.
 
So the differences between the 17 and 17 pro will be a rectangular “bar” with one more camera?

Larger display, faster processor, probably larger sensor size.

Nobody really bought iPhone 15/16 Pro for the weight. If they wanted a lightweight device, it would have been the regular model because it's still 10-15% lighter due to use of aluminum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slippery-pete
"It is unclear why the iPhone 17 Air would have a titanium frame..."

Well, let's see, titanium bends less easily than aluminum, and the iPhone "air" is going to be particularly thin, where rigidity and resistance to bending might be a particular concern, so might that perhaps be the very non-mysterious reason?
I wonder if the titanium 15/16 Pros were meant as a test platform for manufacturing titanium frames for the future Air, which may be more difficult due to their thinner frame.
 
Weight would be a serious consideration. My “heavy” 14 Pro with stainless steel is 206g. The 16 Pro even with titanium is almost 200g. It’s possible that the 17 Pro prototype with titanium was getting too close to or hitting 206g. Going back to aluminum may have been Apple’s only option to keep the weight in check.
The bigger problem here is the choices Apple makes about the dimensions of the phone. They make them larger and fill that extra space making the phone heavier. I'd have preferred for the 16 Pro to get smaller bezels and smaller case size over an even larger phone ad they did in the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProbablyDylan
Ti has definitely been my favorite material. It's way stronger than Al without adding much weight. I reckon I notice it more than most people because I don't use a case. That said, I appreciate the thermals and lower weight of Al enough to not really care at the end of the day. Just don't go back to steel... it was getting too heavy at these sizes.

On another note, I really hope those renders aren't true. Oof.
 
The bigger problem here is the choices Apple makes about the dimensions of the phone. They make them larger and fill that extra space making the phone heavier. I'd have preferred for the 16 Pro to get smaller bezels and smaller case size over an even larger phone ad they did in the end.
Would you like another mini model?
 
I mean, it's a really poor design change for the sake of it (presumably to align with the price flop that will be the 17 Air) but FFS, at the very least, they need to match the colour of the camera array area to the rest of the phone. Otherwise it looks like an obvious nod to the Dynamic Island on the display side.

You can say what you like about Jony Ive but at least he had some clear design credentials. This just looks like a bunch of recent former STEM interns have churned out this crap, hence the awful aesthetics.

As for the switch back to aluminium again, it's obviously to save money.
 
Last edited:
I vastly prefer steel or titanium for a premium phone. Why would they switch to an inferior material?
As a 14 Pro owner, I hope stainless steel doesn’t make a comeback and I have a feeling it won’t based on the weight and complaints that Apple got for that. When I first tried out the 15 Pro in the Apple Store, I was thinking maybe I should’ve waited one more year to replace my 12 Pro. I’m okay with the aluminum “downgrade” because I think with titanium, the 17 Pro would’ve been too close in weight to my 14 Pro. Other than the weight, my 14 Pro has been great and trouble free.
 
It is going to be a new grade/kind of aluminum. (well it is going to be labeled as such)
"You are going to love it!"
No doubt you were just trying to be cute. But the fact is that pure aluminum is far too soft to be used in a phone frame, so alloys are always used. Various different compositions of metal and various different heat treatments; then form factor further impacts the frame performance. Yes Apple will likely proclaim the benefits of whatever alloys are used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DefNotAnLLM
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.