Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In terms of aesthetics alone, it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al. And Ti had coating issues that SS and Al didn't. The only benefit was really weight but they could've just stuck with Al and that would've been lighter than SS too. Just a dumb move by a CEO that isn't a product person.

I'll never forget this post by #Mrkevinfinnerty :

"While Jobs was jousting with the audience Tim was imagining what the margins would be if the new iPod was made out of wood."

It's only a matter of time before we see a plastic iPhone (again).
Steve Jobs introduced a titanium PowerBook before redesigning it to be aluminum.
The iPod touch was stainless steel for years before becoming aluminum.
The first iPhone was aluminum and plastic on the sides of back, the second and third were just plastic, the fourth and fifth were glass and stainless steel, the sixth and seventh were aluminum and glass… Before returning to plastic and aluminum with the iPhone 6, which was actually the eighth generation.
Steve cycled through his materials just the same way that Tim does.
 
I hope its polished aluminum, that would be nice. Maybe the Pro phones will come in more colors if they switch to aluminum?

The weight was always the worst part about the Pros, and this looks to be a chonkster, so hopefully the switch negates some of the weight gain
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnbreakableAlex
I mean, it's a really poor design change for the sake of it...

You can say what you like about Jony Ive but at least he had some clear design credentials. This just looks like a bunch of recent former STEM interns have churned out this crap, hence the awful aesthetics.
Why do you diss STEM? And IMO it is absurd to diss the aesthetics given that we have not seen the next gen phones yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Can’t wait for their “most durable iPhone ever” with “all-new titanium” called the iPhone 18 Ultra next year…
 
I think the part going across the back (like Pixel phone) can be great... but I just don't get preserving the triangular layout too. Raised strip with- if necessary- raised lenses in a row at each end, one more camera and flash, etc in-between and wobble is mostly addressed. Not sure why this phone would need the raised platform too. Maybe camera lenses alone hanging off of an even "thinner" body is just too ugly?
Except this render has the lens still sticking out the right, so it'll still be awful to type on a surface.
 
That's fine. Close to 90% of people use a case and don't care, and a good 90% of the remaining 10% couldn't find titanium and aluminum on a periodic table, and have no idea what the difference is.

That said, that render looks awful.
I too make up statistics on the spot, 56% of the time. Well done, well done.

100% agreed on that render. It’s hideous.
 
I too make up statistics on the spot, 56% of the time. Well done, well done.

100% agreed on that render. It’s hideous.

There have been several surveys that put case usage at between 80 and 90%. The numbers have been consistent.

I personally rarely see phones without a case.

 
  • Like
Reactions: ebika
I liked titanium in that it made the Pro phones lighter, but otherwise don't care much. I'd prefer aluminum on the Pro models if it makes them lighter. To me, that gives more of a real benefit than using a "fancier" material.
 
I wonder if the titanium 15/16 Pros were meant as a test platform for manufacturing titanium frames for the future Air, which may be more difficult due to their thinner frame.
I doubt if Apple builds its best flagship phones as test platorms for future lower end models.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
There have been several surveys that put case usage at between 80 and 90%. The numbers have been consistent.

I personally rarely see phones without a case.

Fortunately Apple builds its phones to stand alone, uber durable and so far generally quite attractive. Why some folks kludge superb phones with ugly cases is I guess in the eyes of those users. Cases are not for me, at least not since the iPhones became so very tough as they have been for the last few generations.
 
In terms of aesthetics alone, it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al. And Ti had coating issues that SS and Al didn't. The only benefit was really weight but they could've just stuck with Al and that would've been lighter than SS too. Just a dumb move by a CEO that isn't a product person.

I'll never forget this post by #Mrkevinfinnerty :

"While Jobs was jousting with the audience Tim was imagining what the margins would be if the new iPod was made out of wood."

It's only a matter of time before we see a plastic iPhone (again).
You say "it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al" because you fail to grasp that these are all alloys. SS is by definition an alloy and titanium is only ised in alloy form. Then heat treating and forming further change whatever alloys are used. Whining about switch to from SS to Ti is largely nonsensical.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.