Steve Jobs introduced a titanium PowerBook before redesigning it to be aluminum.In terms of aesthetics alone, it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al. And Ti had coating issues that SS and Al didn't. The only benefit was really weight but they could've just stuck with Al and that would've been lighter than SS too. Just a dumb move by a CEO that isn't a product person.
I'll never forget this post by #Mrkevinfinnerty :
"While Jobs was jousting with the audience Tim was imagining what the margins would be if the new iPod was made out of wood."
It's only a matter of time before we see a plastic iPhone (again).
Why do you diss STEM? And IMO it is absurd to diss the aesthetics given that we have not seen the next gen phones yet.I mean, it's a really poor design change for the sake of it...
You can say what you like about Jony Ive but at least he had some clear design credentials. This just looks like a bunch of recent former STEM interns have churned out this crap, hence the awful aesthetics.
Who in their right mind would buy both Pro models combined?iPhone 17 Air will outsell BOTH Pro models combined.
Except this render has the lens still sticking out the right, so it'll still be awful to type on a surface.I think the part going across the back (like Pixel phone) can be great... but I just don't get preserving the triangular layout too. Raised strip with- if necessary- raised lenses in a row at each end, one more camera and flash, etc in-between and wobble is mostly addressed. Not sure why this phone would need the raised platform too. Maybe camera lenses alone hanging off of an even "thinner" body is just too ugly?
I too make up statistics on the spot, 56% of the time. Well done, well done.That's fine. Close to 90% of people use a case and don't care, and a good 90% of the remaining 10% couldn't find titanium and aluminum on a periodic table, and have no idea what the difference is.
That said, that render looks awful.
Comparison of pure metals is irrelevant for phone frames.It's not inferior, it's lighter than both titanium and and steel...
I heard that Adamantium is fashionable again.Maybe it'll be made out of Unobtainium, Vibranium, or Kryptonite. 🤔
I too make up statistics on the spot, 56% of the time. Well done, well done.
100% agreed on that render. It’s hideous.
I doubt if Apple builds its best flagship phones as test platorms for future lower end models.I wonder if the titanium 15/16 Pros were meant as a test platform for manufacturing titanium frames for the future Air, which may be more difficult due to their thinner frame.
Expensive and not recyclable.Why not carbon fiber?
It is good enough for high-end bicycle frames and golf clubs.
Fortunately Apple builds its phones to stand alone, uber durable and so far generally quite attractive. Why some folks kludge superb phones with ugly cases is I guess in the eyes of those users. Cases are not for me, at least not since the iPhones became so very tough as they have been for the last few generations.There have been several surveys that put case usage at between 80 and 90%. The numbers have been consistent.
I personally rarely see phones without a case.
![]()
Mobile Cases and Covers Market 5.39% CAGR & New Product Development
The mobile cases and covers market is expected to see growth from USD 24.96 billion in 2024 to USD 42.19 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 5.39%.www.towardspackaging.com
You say "it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al" because you fail to grasp that these are all alloys. SS is by definition an alloy and titanium is only ised in alloy form. Then heat treating and forming further change whatever alloys are used. Whining about switch to from SS to Ti is largely nonsensical.In terms of aesthetics alone, it made no sense to switch to from SS to Ti. Ti feels and looks exactly like Al. And Ti had coating issues that SS and Al didn't. The only benefit was really weight but they could've just stuck with Al and that would've been lighter than SS too. Just a dumb move by a CEO that isn't a product person.
I'll never forget this post by #Mrkevinfinnerty :
"While Jobs was jousting with the audience Tim was imagining what the margins would be if the new iPod was made out of wood."
It's only a matter of time before we see a plastic iPhone (again).
Terrible heat dissipation, heavily interferes with radio signals, prone to shattering, expensive.Why not carbon fiber?
It is good enough for high-end bicycle frames and golf clubs.
And it might be. Why would you denigrate some new titanium alloy?Can’t wait for their “most durable iPhone ever” with “all-new titanium” called the iPhone 18 Ultra next year…
So how we will celebrate this innovative move from titanium to aluminium? Groundbreaking!Aluminum -> Steel -> Titanium -> Aluminum
Leather -> FineWoven -> Leather
Mostly true except: carbon fiber has great heat dissipation along the direction of the carbon fibers. Yes it’s expensive but so is titanium. And it has better strength than aluminum.Terrible heat dissipation, heavily interferes with radio signals, prone to shattering, expensive.
Is there a reason they don't use magnesium? It's lighter and stronger than aluminum, steel and titanium. A lot of cameras have magnesium frames for the weight savings and strength.It's not inferior, it's lighter than both titanium and and steel...