Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
When the Pro models get the C1X/C2 next year they'll be ridiculously good on battery life judging by the Air.
 
Launch day 17 pro max.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0255.png
    IMG_0255.png
    241.9 KB · Views: 88
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Coconut Battery is reporting my 17P (nano sim) capacity as 3945 mAh - I thought the nano sim models were rated at 3988 mAh? Anyone else with a nano sim model seeing something similar?

iOS analytics on the other hand lists maxFCC as 4030 mAh and nominalchargecapacity as 4033 mAh.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-01-01 at 9.11.53 AM.png
    Screenshot 2026-01-01 at 9.11.53 AM.png
    127.4 KB · Views: 24
Coconut Battery is reporting my 17P (nano sim) capacity as 3945 mAh - I thought the nano sim models were rated at 3988 mAh? Anyone else with a nano sim model seeing something similar?

iOS analytics on the other hand lists maxFCC as 4030 mAh and nominalchargecapacity as 4033 mAh.
Normal for it to be a little bit off. Batteries are never exact. My wife's 17 Pro is 103.9% of design capacity. My 17 Pro Max is 101.7%. Most of my iPhones have been over provisioned above design capacity. My 6+ was the only phone that wasn't (if I am remembering correctly).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tsepz and mav2012
Normal for it to be a little bit off. Batteries are never exact. My wife's 17 Pro is 103.9% of design capacity. My 17 Pro Max is 101.7%. Most of my iPhones have been over provisioned above design capacity. My 6+ was the only phone that wasn't (if I am remembering correctly)
Thanks for the reply! Also noticed Coconut Battery shows an incorrect manufacture date as the iPhone says the battery was manufactured in September while CB says 28-Dec-25 which is when I purchased and activated the phone. Must be a CB bug
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.