Quite a few people. Most consumers don’t obsess over specs like many on sites like MR and the like.Does anybody even want this phone?
I sell these things. I see it firsthand.This was proven to be wrong. Best selling phone is the Pro. The Air got rejected because of less features and the 16e didn’t sell well unlike the 17 which gained 120hz. Costumers are not dumb. More and more people are getting more tech savvy since they grew up with tech.
The SE didn’t flop and had the home-button design and LCD until this year.The Dynamic Island makes sense for the e. The 17 got 120hz so the e will be upgraded to the Dynamic Island. 120hz will be the differentiation feature. If the notch stays it will flop because Apple is holding the "new" (its a four years old design) design back on purpose.
It’s not an SE model, that’s why they renamed it and called it “16”.Apple 🍎 must’ve liked the sales numbers from the 16e because they usually go 3 years to update the SE models. 📱
I wonder how many SE buyers actually appreciated either the smaller size, the home button, Touch ID, or the LCD screen. Apple dropped all that differentiation for the 16e. There’s still the differentiation of almost no camera bump and the notch, but that’s probably a smaller market, while they also hiked the price up.I think Apple wants or thinks that costumers see the 16e as an updated version of the SE and now the 17e an updated version of the 16e but costumers are not stupid. They see the e as downgrade compared to last years standard model with less features that is why it doesn’t sell well.
You seriously could not manage daily with a 16e? I mean I’m not overly impressed at the price point but I know I could manage with one if that’s what I could afford.My wife has a 16 e for her work phone. It’s not bad for just that. Couldn’t use it as my daily driver.
If my mini broke and I couldn’t replace it, I would likely get the e. It’s the most compact and light-weight iPhone with great battery life, and looks sleek.i’m not sure the “e” line needs a yearly release. who are these selling to outside of business customers?
Yeah this makes some sense. Bc otherwise you’re standing up a brand new line for the frame… maybe that’s a lot cheaper, but when you can buy an OtterBox (or whatever) that works with the 14, 15, and 16e (and the last SE was the same as the iPhone 6, right?), I’m suspicious resizing a frame is a cheap endeavor.Or the screen actually becomes larger, like the 14 Pro was 6.12” (1179 pixels wide) vs. the 6.06” of the 13 Pro (1170 pixels). The 15 Pro was the narrowest 6.1” iPhone at 70.6 mm wide, 0.9 mm narrower. I wouldn’t expect any more.
It's the kind of update that would deliver a noticeable design improvement without adding much to manufacturing costs.
I like the new “e” and slim “Air” models, the price point is just the only problem with them. Apple 🍎 will just blame it on inflation. 📉📈It’s not an SE model, that’s why they renamed it and called it “16”.
Does anybody even want this phone?
It shouldn’t get Dynamic Island. This is to differentiate between the cheap model and premium models.
Why? Why not just have decent iphones without all the tiering going on. Apple are losing it. They gonna make the heaviest iphone ever this year. They gonna make the most expensive iphone this year (maybe next) the fold. This will be a £2K+ phone. rofl. They have lost the goal of making decent, affordable competent iphones for the people. As for the software, bugs and complexity it's too much. How many iphone models are available right now (excluding memory options) too many, I actually don't even know. They will bloat up the iphone a bit more maybe another year then hopefully they will revert and produce an actual decent, moderate phone device.It shouldn’t get Dynamic Island. This is to differentiate between the cheap model and premium models.
Honestly at this point I may better get an iPhone 16 or 17, especially the latter. With the much improved GPU performance for a more graphically demanding iOS 26, faster 8GB of RAM…
But if the A19 is such a great SoC, why not just wait for the 17e then?
Well , for one, because the second camera is quite useful for capturing more space at less distance, and the new selfie front camera also has quite good applications.
And the forgotten dedicated camera button (capture button) is absent from the 16e and will be absent from the 17e, and I can see it useful for opening the camera quickly, instead of swiping right from the Lock Screen.
Also, I have the feeling that the A19 SoC from the 17e will be a binned one, something that has its own advantages and disadvantages…
But, overall, what would make me get the iPhone 17 over a future, cheaper, lighter 17e, is the screen. The new iPhone 17 has a high refresh rate pro-motion screen, plus always on, and most importantly, the feature to reduce PWM flickering (I know, it doesn’t eliminate it, but I’m quite sure it makes the phone more usable). All of that isn’t on the iPhone 14, or 16e OLED display.
No doubt this is such a best seller, never in the recent history of Apple, since they offer several models and sizes, the base iPhone has been such a great deal.
Sadly, the iPhone 17 is expensive, especially here in Europe, priced at 950€![]()
Does anybody even want this phone?
Says no one. Dismissed! That will never happen, smaller phones are dead in the iPhone lineup. The people have spoke and want their tv screens.I want iPhone SE 4 instead this
I actually know a few people that bought the 16e as their personal phone.i’m not sure the “e” line needs a yearly release. who are these selling to outside of business customers?