I was thinking the exact same thing, and one of techs that looks promising is Solid State Batteries - but again until it's IN a consumer device who knows.How about better battery technology? Where are all these amazing batteries articles were written about years ago that never saw the light of day? Is that the one technology we can never evolve?
What a great way to make people buy the under-selling iPhone Air! Make the Pro heavier and the Air looks much more attractive!Bigger battery means it will weigh more.
It sounds like Apple is heading in the opposite direction than in the Air.
I did, absolutely love the size/weight of the phone; however, the camera sucks!It's already so heavy. I hope they use new battery technology on the Air 2 and I will switch from 17 Pro Max.
If you charged with a 5W brick it probably will.It lasts 2 days but will still take 2 days to charge.
Truth in that…Who. Cares.
It’s been 10 years of the same nonsense hype.
If I charged with a 20W brick it would. Its time Apple got on the 80W train.If you charged with a 5W brick it probably will.
So many downsides to that with one tiny upside to a handful of people maybe.If I charged with a 20W brick it would. Its time Apple got on the 80W train.
And whilst they would bemoan the theoretical lifespan they could put in ways of making the battery user-replaceable whilst keeping the device IP68 compliant but they (and everybody else) choose not to.completely agree with this.
In this day and age we are still limited with the relatively slow charging with the iPhones. it would be a very "Pro" move to wait your phone to charge half a day. Competition, with the help of SC batteries, are years ahead.
The same handful of people who are apparently on a deserted island all day and nowhere near a charger and need 2 days of battery life where most people are fine with the way it is.So many downsides to that with one tiny upside to a handful of people maybe.
If I charged with a 20W brick it would. Its time Apple got on the 80W train.