Thank you. Good lord. It isn't a god-given right to use an iPhone. Return it and get a different phone. The end.
People love their iPhones, they want them to work perfectly and "NO" they don't want to get somethin else. The end.
Thank you. Good lord. It isn't a god-given right to use an iPhone. Return it and get a different phone. The end.
Thank you. Good lord. It isn't a god-given right to use an iPhone. Return it and get a different phone. The end.
Because people other than Apple have done testing and determined it's a hardware flaw. Apple's "fix" is for something completely different AND the "super ultra mega kung fu grip of ultimate death" crap is, AGAIN, something entirely different, the one thing that Apple actually got right when they proclaimed that it happens to most phones to some degree or another. That you can take a car key, little finger, wire, a ring or anyting conductive, bridge the gap in the band and kill your phone is something unique to the iPhone, something they have yet to even address. That's two actual problems and one Apple made up for some inexplicable reason for those keeping score. The fun part is how Apple says the iPhone 4 is being too generous with the displayed bars even those it shows one on my phone yet gets better reception than previous iPhones that show 2-4. I can't wait to hear whatever Apple is supposed to make sound like plausible truth today! Even BP managed to man up and admit it really screwed up in the gulf, let's see if Apple is more or less of a liar than "big oil". Who's up for a bet?![]()
Apart from a few reports on so called tech blogs and websites I have not seen any refutable evidence that it is either a hardware or software problem. Hence I suggest we wait for an official response before we all go stir crazy.
Free bumpers is not a solution. I don't want a bumper on my phone and I shouldn't be forced to put one on it, whether it's free or not, so that I can make a call.
Apart from a few reports on so called tech blogs and websites I have not seen any refutable evidence that it is either a hardware or software problem. Hence I suggest we wait for an official response before we all go stir crazy.
First of all, I think you meant irrefutable.
Thanks, I blame the iPhone's keyboard
Second, we haven't seen any evidence? I bet you would have kept driving your Toyota death trap for months after people were crashing them, right? I mean, Toyota said nothing was wrong with them. They didn't release and "official statement" so there must not have been anything wrong.
They have released an offical statement, hence the global recall on certain vehicles. This only happened after the explored every other avenue. What's more a car possibly being unsafe is a mile away from a piece of electronic equipment on the scale of seriousness.
AnandTech, Consumer Reports, antenna engineers, and many others have gone on record saying that something is fishy about the antenna, and yet because Apple hasn't said anything, you think it's unproven?
You said it yourself, there is something fishy with the antenna. I agree there is something wrong with the iPhone in relation to signal, however be it hardware or software nobody knows. I for one would rather try Apple's official solution (whenever it is released) before having to loose my phone while it is fixed
Of course Apple hasn't said anything. They're trying to sweep it under the rug. It doesn't take a genius to see that a software flaw isn't going to cause the phone to lose all signal when you place a single finger over the seam.
Hard to say what Apple will do but everyone seems to agree that insulating the connection solves the problem, so...$500,000,000 recall or just give out free 99¢ bumpers.
Then you would still have 2 other choices: Use it without or return it.![]()
How many iPhones have Apple sold? They have said they think its a software issue. Before they start an expensive recall procedure they will explore all other avenues.
Are you serious.....Why should I have to buy an accesory for something that is advertised as a WORKING PHONE.....hell it even has it in the name i"phone"
This is not a software issue... This is a physical hardware issue, if they release any software update it would only mask the problem. The only way would be if they moved the antennas....
... software issue, signal bar algoryhthm..... really.
![]()
...and your degree in RF engineering is from what school and please point us to the testing procedures you used to arrive at your conclusion?![]()
Free bumpers is not a solution. I don't want a bumper on my phone and I shouldn't be forced to put one on it, whether it's free or not, so that I can make a call.
...and your degree in RF engineering is from what school and please point us to the testing procedures you used to arrive at your conclusion?![]()
Yes, SOFTWARE FIX can help: The areas with low signal is the main problem. In the areas with very strong signal, I could not even kill one bar. I think I was causing some attenuation, but because the signal was so strong it did not budge. However, when in the area of low signal, it is possible to send the phone searching for signal and hence drop the call. This tells me that Apple is right about the need to have a software fix. The Consumer Report did a controlled experiment, but they did not share how large the drop in signal was.
None of you know how the antenna signals are programmed to work with IP4 hardware and software. Here is the scenario - you hold the phone at the lower-left corner and create significant attenuation - The only way you observe that is by seeing signal bars dropping. Presently, I suspect the OS does not smooth this attenuation, sending the phone searching for some less troubled frequency. In the process you may loose your call or slow down the data speed - both are on the same antenna (I presume). Now with an appropriate software fix, this attenuation can be processed such that phone does not react to it in such a dramatic fashion - result - call continues, data flows - nothing is lost, just few bars
So unless after Apple release the promised patch and it will fail to partially solve the issue (I agree with Apple that every phone has some attenuation) I suggest staying away from mass hysteria. People who return the phones are just dumb, IMO, just look at Consumer Report - it the BEST smart-phone around in every category.
OK let me open your eyes as to why this is a hardware issue. First, Consumer Reports did clearly show in their tests that the signal degraded -20db which coupled with a weaker signal to start with can drop calls/data connectivity.
Your assumption that a software fix can somehow "smooth out" this signal display and affect the signal reception is flawed. When the two different antenna bands (wifi/BT, 3G) are bridged by human contact, metal, etc. what actually happens is the impedance of each antenna is changed/de-tuned causing the received/transmitted signal to lose its optimal radation pattern the antennas were designed for (a.k.a antenna deloading). Because cellular technology uses low level signals to reduce human RF exposure, cell phone antennas are designed to provide an optimal impedance so the maximum amount of signal can be transferred between the RF front-end electronics and the radiating antenna.
Software can control many, many things. But it cannot change the laws of physics or that of RF emissions.
People love their iPhones, they want them to work perfectly and "NO" they don't want to get somethin else. The end.
OK let me open your eyes as to why this is a hardware issue. First, Consumer Reports did clearly show in their tests that the signal degraded -20db which coupled with a weaker signal to start with can drop calls/data connectivity.
Your assumption that a software fix can somehow "smooth out" this signal display and affect the signal reception is flawed. When the two different antenna bands (wifi/BT, 3G) are bridged by human contact, metal, etc. what actually happens is the impedance of each antenna is changed/de-tuned causing the received/transmitted signal to lose its optimal radation pattern the antennas were designed for (a.k.a antenna deloading). Because cellular technology uses low level signals to reduce human RF exposure, cell phone antennas are designed to provide an optimal impedance so the maximum amount of signal can be transferred between the RF front-end electronics and the radiating antenna.
Software can control many, many things. But it cannot change the laws of physics or that of RF emissions.