This is just in the US, that should probably be in the title
No, around the world the 5C fares even worse.
This is just in the US, that should probably be in the title
BREAKING NEWS! Apple can't sell the same product 2 years In a row.
BREAKING NEWS! Apple can't sell the same product 2 years In a row.
Only because the 'cheap' phone was also very expensive. If it was priced at ~£300-350 off contract, it would sell like hot cakes.
To the few people who thought 5C would sell well in China, here's what I've read in a Chinese forums:
"I've talked to a China Unicom employee in one of their shops. The 5s are out of stock, with the gold-coloured being the most popular. They still have 200 pcs of 5c, with all kinds of colours, but no one is buying them."
5c, if they've designed that so it can exploit the low-mid market (though now I think that Apple never intended to do so), is a complete failure. Particularly in China, despite what you guys may think of, there actually exist a ton of filthy rich people who won't blink a bit to buy the 5s. The remaining consumers would buy 5c only if it's priced at $400 or less. In developing countries (or China at least), you have only two consumer groups - those who are (semi-)rich and can buy $600 phones easily and those who won't buy anything more than $400.
Does this analysis have the ability to tell unique users, or is it just the number of website hits?
I have to say I'm skeptical how accurate these numbers are, depending on how their numbers work it's entirely possible that the kind of user who buys a 5s goes online right away and does a ton of heavy use, while 5c users are more casual and just don't go to as many websites as quickly.
Plus I also have my doubts that Apple was able to have in the range of 6.7 million 5s phones ready to sell opening weekend.
I guess we'll probably get real numbers at some point. I'd be surprised if the real numbers match up to these, but even if they do, the 5c will probably end up selling many more in the long run.
Higher priced phone is more popular? More evidence pointing to why Apple does not need to make a "cheap" phone.
Probably a bigger difference between the 5 and 4S last year.
Maybe because the 5c is an iPhone 5 wrapped in colored plastic![]()
No, evidence that the 5C is not cheap enough.
Only because the 'cheap' phone was also very expensive. If it was priced at ~£300-350 off contract, it would sell like hot cakes.
Probably a bigger difference between the 5 and 4S last year.
By how much did the iPhone 5 outsell the 4S on its launch weekend last year at this time?
If its anywhere similar, huge win by Apple, since 4S was still a premium build, and 5C cost reduced to plastic junk.
No, the 4S was still a premium phone whose unique design can still be preferred to the 5 by late adopters.
The 5C is well built, but not premium, and the savings only go to Apple.
iPhone 5C likely sold many more times the 4S last year. 5C is actually a beautifully built device. Try one out.
----------
I was talking about sales
plastic junk
iPhone 5C likely sold many more times the 4S last year. 5C is actually a beautifully built device. Try one out.