IT WONT BE anywhere near this.What we really need is sales comparisons of the iPhone 5 vs iPhone 4S during last year's launch. I'm guessing the ratio was pretty similar.
IT WONT BE anywhere near this.What we really need is sales comparisons of the iPhone 5 vs iPhone 4S during last year's launch. I'm guessing the ratio was pretty similar.
A metallic or glass phone is premium compared to the mass of the market, unless it runs Windows Phone.
A plastic phone is just another plastic phone, Android is good.
Those camped out
want the latest thing. I'm still using my iPhone 4 on SIM-only but if it stopped working and I chose to buy again I'd quite likely choose the 5C. I rarely buy the absolute top of the line as the value isn't there.
You really need to hold one in person, it's pretty amazing what they were able to do with plastic.
What makes the 5c not a "premium" phone? Because it's made out of colorful plastic? I think Jony Ive ("Mr. Unapologetically Plastic") would take issue with you on that.
Yes.
Hopefully Apple realises that they priced the iPhone 5C too high and we actually get the low-cost iPhone we all wanted.
There are plenty of other ways to look at it.
More evidence that consumers are not naive enough to buy a plastic phone with fewer features, when a phone for slightly more money is much more advanced.
More evidence that the color scheme apple chose is hideous.
More evidence that folks wanted a cheaper alternative. Since there isn't one, they are going for the newer tech.
etc...
So what's the point of the 5c ?
No matter how you dice it: consumers are more than willing to buy higher priced Apple products. Apple does not need to offer devices at lower price points to continue to grow.
Parents (being one myself) who have any self respect, won't pay for their kids to have a $2,400 dollar contract for a mobile phone, regardless of the subsidized up-front cost.
All I can say is that you reap what you sow, and teaching your kids that spending that kind of money on them is financially responsible is only going to hurt them in the long run.
You can get a cell phone for $50 off-contract, and pay-go for 10-40 bucks a month depending on what you need, service-wise. Any kid with an iphone who isn't working full time and paying for phone/car/insurance themselves is learning the wrong things about life, and boy, are their parents going to be confused one day when their 35 year old son is living in the basement. Where did we go wrong, honey?
No matter how you dice it: consumers are more than willing to buy higher priced Apple products. Apple does not need to offer devices at lower price points to continue to grow.
That's what I thought, too. But my teen granddaughter and her pre-teen sister both want the 5s. The color options did not sway them. The one feature that intrigued them was the finger print sensor.
I also think that in more affluent areas, the initial cost of the iphone was not, nor will be, the determinating factor. Most of the cost of owning a smart phone is in the service each month. Looking at the entire cost over the two year contract, the extra $100 is not a deal breaker.
Economically illiterate consumers?
Higher priced phone is more popular? More evidence pointing to why Apple does not need to make a "cheap" phone.
No matter how you dice it: consumers are more than willing to buy higher priced Apple products. Apple does not need to offer devices at lower price points to continue to grow.
Definitely the correct analysis of these numbers. How many people, for example, were lining up to buy the iPhone 4S last year?If people think about this, it isn't all that surprising.
What type of person will be waiting in line for a new iPhone - the type who wants the latest and greatest, aka the iPhone 5S.
Down the line, however, the 5C will likely catch up in popularity as those looking for a "cheaper" upgrade could go for the colorful, durable 5C option.
Way to early to call the 5C a fail or flop as we have no yet reached the time period/consumer base for which the phone was intended.
Higher priced phone is more popular? More evidence pointing to why Apple does not need to make a "cheap" phone.
You really need to hold one in person, it's pretty amazing what they were able to do with plastic.
Define "grow"
In a closed environment, you are correct. Given the choice of two, more consumers are picking the one with much better specs, and doesn't look like a pastel skittle for $100 more.
On the other hand, in a NON-closed environment, given the choice of an outrageously expensive plastic iPhone, or an any number of attractive android phone for hundreds less, many folks will opt for the android alternative. And market share keeps slip sliding away.
Higher priced phone is more popular? More evidence pointing to why Apple does not need to make a "cheap" phone.
The reason the 5C isn't priced lower is because of subsidies. The typical subsidy is $450 over 2 years. If a phone is priced at $450 or lower, the phone is free on contract. Anything less than $450 benefits only the cell carrier. The iphone 4s is free on contract, the 5c can't be priced the same as the 4s, so it's $99. When the 4s goes away, it would be nice if the 5c was free.
You missed the point. The 5C makes good sense from a business point of view, not from a consumer point of view. Part of running a successful business is selling what your customers want, even if it defies logic. It's not your job to educate customers.Once both of you move past a 101 level business class in your undergraduate studies, you will get the aha moment on why the 5C makes sense. Stay in school.![]()