I think this is great, Apple should be using their cash to purchase interesting and unique (in implementation) features they can add to the iPhone. I take it there's no amount of money that can buy 50% more battery density right now though 
How would anybody come up with the idea that one will not be able to turn it off? Look through the settings app on your iPhone, you can turn off pretty much everything.I may get onboard with the idea, but only if it can be turned on/off at will.
So, your statement that you are perfectly happy with your iPhone 5 only strictly refers to hardware features? In regard to software you see areas that could be improved, whereas in hardware you cannot think of any?
I didn't bother reading your post after seeing numbers. Go back to my early reply to AppleIsKing. When I said "Failing", I mean't failing in quality and innovation. Apple needs to get rid of the "It's just enough" attitude towards the iPhone. They need to make the iPhone an overachiever just like the Mac is, because that's what makes Macs great.
Perhaps it's because you're not considering how a fingerprint sensor could be used.
My #1 reason to be excited about it is mobile payments. Download the Apple Store app and go to your nearest Apple Store to check out how it might work. Now imagine if Apple convinces all the other retailers to use the same model. And they just might because 5-20% of sales at retailers are lost due to fraudulent purchases.
My #2 reason is that if the rumors are true and it can also be used as a joystick control, this sets up the iPhone to be used as a controller for the Apple TV if and when it is opened to third party apps. Games.
Even though it's going to need a 'live' /active finger for the access, just think of all the dumb thieves that are going to cut peoples thumbs and fingers off when they steal their iPhone now because they think they'll need their fingerprint..which won't work.
And yes, I'm being dead serious. You'll hear a story like this within 6 months of someone getting one of their fingers chopped off in the robbery with the phone.
----------
iMacs don't run each release of OSX, nor do PCs run each release of Windows. Their are minimum processor specs. Same with the iPhone.
Sorry but your argument just isn't sound.
What I find hilarious about this thread is people actually believe that Apple would be so stupid as to put a convex button so large it would actually protrude enough to cause a problem.
How quick these same individuals are to forget that Apple has highly skilled engineers![]()
If the size bothers you don't buy one. Do you also complain about the laptop sizes that Apple makes? Was 17" too big for you? How about 15"? How about 13"? How about 11"? Good thing you're not in charge of Apple.
Helps what?
If you have normal vision, and are holding an iPhone at a typical viewing distance, you don't need to squint.
Sorry, you had answered to BarryL's question which he had posed to juanmanas, and I thus had assumed that you were juanmanas.I didn't make any statement about being happy with my iPhone 5. I don't have an iPhone 5. But I am perfectly happy with my galaxy S4.
1. I don't care about paying for things with a phone. It's utterly meaningless to me.
2. iOS7 has API's for controller support so this feature will come to my iPhone 5.
Will it recognize my middle finger or will this be too politically incorrect for Apple?![]()
HAHA. So you're replying to a post about size options, and your argument is to cite a product line that DOES offer options as a rebuttal? That's brilliant.
There is one size iPhone (2 if you count a now EOL model).... with laptops you have several size choices, and tablet options. iPhonoe... you have the option Apple says is good for you.
I don't have fingerprints. I hope there is an on/off switch.
I don't have fingerprints. I hope there is an on/off switch.
Even so, are you saying it is easier to view a 4" screen than a 5" screen when both are held at the same distance? Because if you are you are wrong. Period.