Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well then you should take it to the Apple store and have them look at it. Your issue has literally nothing to do with this article.

I should have added, I hope the battery is more reliable than the ones in that past. This isn't the first time that the battery inside one of my iPhones became a problem. It was taken to Apple and replaced. Two batteries out of my three iPhones, four if you count the replacement, had longevity and charging issues.
 
And if you are posting to say "I charge my phone overnight and it works for 2 days and I'm a POWER user" well then buddy, sorry to break it to you, but you're not.

I charge my phone at least once a day, sometimes twice. So you must have me mixed up with something one of the other posters said.
 
I know I am in the minority here.

But personally I feel the battery life in my 5S is plenty already.
And I am far more excited about the device being slimmer. Slimness is by far the feature I am most excited for the in the iPhone 6.

Of course battery life improvements are welcome.
actual battery capacity a little larger --- good
A8 chip more energy efficient --- good
iOS 8 software optimization --- good

I am not worried about the battery in the new phone at all.
looking forward to it :)
 
I think people are looking for a BIG increase. Eeking out a few percent more when the case size is going up in both width & height might be a perceived let down.

For the 5.5" iPhone, it's a 65% increase. I'd say that qualifies as a big increase. Even the 4.7" iPhone represents a 20% increase, that's not huge but sizeable and definitely more than a few percent. If anything, those are bigger than what I had expected given Apple's obsession with thin form factor.

I'd say this is a classic case where the headline is changing the reader's perception.
 
I should have added, I hope the battery is more reliable than the ones in that past. This isn't the first time that the battery inside one of my iPhones became a problem. It was taken to Apple and replaced. Two batteries out of my three iPhones, four if you count the replacement, had longevity and charging issues.

That sounds like terrible luck to me - I know a lot of people with iPhones, and don't know anyone who has had a battery fail on them.
 
Oh how a news bite can be spun in any direction to create desired response!

Let me re-write the article:

Apple iPhone 6 to Sport Better Battery Life

The 4.7" variant of Apple's iPhone 6 is expected to carry a higher capacity battery than its predecessor, the iPhone 5s. At approximately 1,850 mAh, this new battery is approximately 20% greater capacity than the 1,500 mAh found in the iPhone 5s.

Undoubtedly, the larger display and greater pixel count of the iPhone 6 display will demand more power than the iPhone 5s, but how much so remains to be seen. By comparison to other historical changes, such as the introduction of the Retina Display, and the introduction of the 4" display, the bump to the 4.7" should not be viewed as anything more than a modest increase in power demand. Additionally, the iPhone 6 is also expected to sport the next generation Apple SoC, the A8, which is if history is any indication, will also improve power efficiency by a measurable percentage.

The end result is likely to be a noticeable improvement to battery life over the 5s, a welcome enhancement for iPhone owners.

How is one to project outrage with such an article? I would much rather convince myself as someone with zero design experience that Apple's approach is wrong even while knowing absolutely nothing about the final device much less having day-to-day experience with it. I would also like to state that innovation isn't making a mobile device lighter and thinner and engineering battery technology towards that concept but rather innovation is retaining the current phone's profile while merely increasing battery capacity.

In addition I would also like to state that I have no idea what I'm going to eat for dinner but I've already decided it sucks.
 
After a year the battery in my 5 pretty much failed. At 15% it would shut off. As soon as I plugged it in it would read 30%+.

Mine is now shutting off at 33% after 15 months. My wife's (bought together) is even worse, and her charging is very predictable: full charge every night on the OEM charger, used on wifi all day at home and work, lots of texting, moderate call usage and minor web surfing. Reboots or turns off randomly, won't turn back on unless plugged into charger, then displays 70% charge.

There is something about the chemistry with at least some of the iPhone 5 batteries that is causing them to become completely unreliable after a year. Should we file a class action lawsuit? How long should these (non-replaceable) batteries last? I would expect three years of reliable usage plus a few more years in a lesser state.

We now have purchased three additional, certified, lightning charging cables - one car, one black USB and one 6" white USB for a portable charger. We live in paranoia that at any moment our phone will shut off and leave us disconnected until we can find a charger, and I'm not sure we are going to make it until the iPhone 6 is released. :mad::apple::mad:
 
There is no such thing as enough battery life.

But the thinness thing needs to stop. If the phone is too thin, it will be difficult to hold while talking.
 
Oh how a news bite can be spun in any direction to create desired response!

Let me re-write the article:

Apple iPhone 6 to Sport Better Battery Life

The 4.7" variant of Apple's iPhone 6 is expected to carry a higher capacity battery than its predecessor, the iPhone 5s. At approximately 1,850 mAh, this new battery is approximately 20% greater capacity than the 1,500 mAh found in the iPhone 5s.

Undoubtedly, the larger display and greater pixel count of the iPhone 6 display will demand more power than the iPhone 5s, but how much so remains to be seen. By comparison to other historical changes, such as the introduction of the Retina Display, and the introduction of the 4" display, the bump to the 4.7" should not be viewed as anything more than a modest increase in power demand. Additionally, the iPhone 6 is also expected to sport the next generation Apple SoC, the A8, which is if history is any indication, will also improve power efficiency by a measurable percentage.

The end result is likely to be a noticeable improvement to battery life over the 5s, a welcome enhancement for iPhone owners.

Yes, that spins well. Now how about a re-write where we imagine Apple gets after this one in full (they want the battery case money instead of leaving it for Mophie, etc) and thus builds the bigger battery into the added width & height. That 20% probably becomes 100-120% and those claiming they barely get 4 hours perceive 8 and those that claim 2 days perceive they'll get 4.

Marketing spin is like that. You can make nothing sound like something with the right amount of spin. But that's just trickery. The added space with the 6 offers a real opportunity to deliver a big improvement in battery life, which would be a big utility gain for every single iPhone user. Rather than tricky spin, Apple could just replicate the message of battery life with the Macbook Air or even rMBP. Phil could do a "Wall hugger my *ss". What would resonate better post launch: 20% more battery life or 100% more battery life? If we think thin is that important, how about 1mm thinner than 5s for "thinnest iPhone ever" + 80% more battery life?
 
I'm looking forward to the more svelte model. This is site is full of doom sayers sometimes. :rolleyes:

You WANT a fatter phone? Then get a battery case. Some people prefer the slim design. Every time I take my case off of my 5S I think... damn this thing is awesome and I hate how fat the case makes it. Thinner would mean that a case would make it the same thickness as it is now without one.

Also, this isn't "worse" battery, it's slightly bigger, so it'll probably be about the same, which is fine for the average user.

Stop your crying people! :confused:

Right on!
 
After seeing what Apple did with the iMac, a device that is now a MacBook Air on a stick (literally), I just can't be surprised or disappointed.

I sort of "get" it on a detached corporate level, it is a way to distinguish the product, be it a phone, a laptop or iMac, since it is simply not feasible for 99% of hardware makers to make thin devices.

It demands special tooling, design, customization, work, money, effort, blood, sweat, tears etc. that other hardware makers just can't, won't or for whatever other reason don't compete with.

The average Windows all-in-one PC is still as thick as the original iMac G5, the average Windows laptop is as thick as the original PowerBook G4 and now the average phone will be 1-2mm thicker than an iPhone.

I just do not care. If I want an iPhone, I get an iPhone. I don't care about 1-2mm margin on the thickness of the device. ;):apple:
 
I think people are looking for a BIG increase. Eeking out a few percent more when the case size is going up in both width & height might be a perceived let down. If there was ever an opportunity to take this variable and really jack it up- this (6) is it.

However, it's not surprise (to me anyway) that Apple is probably going to try to maximize thin again rather than seize this opportunity to give marketing a claim of "thinner" (just not as thin as possible) AND a bigger battery. It seems likely that Apple could shave a millimeter or two off of the 5s "thin" so they could still spin "thinnest iPhone ever" but then stuff that extra width & height with more battery. That can persist one of their favorite launch marketing bullets and add a very tangible, much-wanted utility benefit for all consumers.

Once they roll a a thinnest-possible 6, it's not like we or they will expect them to "fatten" the 7 to address more battery life then. It doesn't seem likely that a 7 or 8 will probably grow width & height by much more (to potentially create space for more battery either). So this (6) is the time to really address this one.

I couldn't agree more. Now it would have been a perfect time for some changes to the better. If these rumors and the mockups we have seen so far are somewhat correct, then there is nothing particularly clever about the design. Overly thin with results in a below average battery life, and huge ugly bezels just to house the home button and have a symmetrical design which results in an above average sized smartphone for its screen size.

Bravo, Jony
eusa_clap.gif
 
Mine is now shutting off at 33% after 15 months. My wife's (bought together) is even worse, and her charging is very predictable: full charge every night on the OEM charger, used on wifi all day at home and work, lots of texting, moderate call usage and minor web surfing. Reboots or turns off randomly, won't turn back on unless plugged into charger, then displays 70% charge.:

Bring the phones to the Apple store, as those batteries appear to have reached a failed/defective state.

I've had my iPhone 5 battery replaced twice so far under AppleCare, because it started shutting off at about 10-15%. They have you connect to a diagnostic tool over WiFi, pull the logs, and if the battery state appears as "FAILED," they'll replace it.
 
For developers, Apple has excellent documentation that tells developers how to use location services without turning GPS on. It's mostly a matter of the application saying how precise it needs the location. If 200m precision is enough, GPS will not be used (unless you are in the desert with no WiFi signal or cell tower for miles and miles). And apps that gather location data can leave that to the M7 chip while they run in the background.

I always suspect there is some conscientious developer doing everything right, and then some marketing guy says "why does that app not know the precise location, only with 80 meters error? Turn the GPS on!". Marketing people only care about appearances, they don't care about actual usefulness of their product.

What you say is true but in NYC where I live (and probably every city) , Wi-Fi-based location is worthless for specific locations. I rarely use Facebook but when I do check in to any location and post a pic from there, the GPS saves me from scrolling through a list of 100 bars and stores. It always manages to nail the one I'm in and then when I go next-door, it gets that right too. That minute or two of time saving is worth the few minutes less of battery it might be killing to me but I also force-quit Facebook when I'm not using it so I might not be a fair use case either.
 
For the 5.5" iPhone, it's a 65% increase. I'd say that qualifies as a big increase. Even the 4.7" iPhone represents a 20% increase, that's not huge but sizeable and definitely more than a few percent. If anything, those are bigger than what I had expected given Apple's obsession with thin form factor.

I'd say this is a classic case where the headline is changing the reader's perception.

I'll hope you are right. In our experience… in our own "real world usage", we've never had an iPhone with enough charge on it's own that we didn't need a battery case too. So maybe this time will be different… or not. I simply wish that the battery in the case could fit into the added width & height of a 6 even if the thickness had to stay the same as the (IMO) plenty-thin 5s. Nevertheless, I'll expect the 6 to basically require battery cases for our needs… not because it's the only way but because a choice is made for "thinnest ever" (spin) over the tangible utility of filling the space with additional battery.
 
How is one to project outrage with such an article? I would much rather convince myself as someone with zero design experience that Apple's approach is wrong even while knowing absolutely nothing about the final device much less having day-to-day experience with it. I would also like to state that innovation isn't making a mobile device lighter and thinner and engineering battery technology towards that concept but rather innovation is retaining the current phone's profile while merely increasing battery capacity.

In addition I would also like to state that I have no idea what I'm going to eat for dinner but I've already decided it sucks.

Indeed. It is not enough for Macrumors to post rumors/information....they see the need to create drama for an already on-edge, borderline line nutcase general readership.
 
Because obviously everyone wants paper thin phones /s

The 5s is extremely thin, just keep that thinness, boost the screen size, add bigger batter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.