Already covered in the above post:
"I'm not contesting Displaymate's measurements and conclusion that the Amoled screen on the note7 has SUPERIOR quality a like colour gamut, infinite blacks, etc.
However, their lack of reporting and focus on some of the (important) negatives is not doing anyone justice.
I know that many would say that the (1)flicker and (2)pixel miss-registration and (3)burn-in: is not noticeable, and minimal and "who cares"... But to some, it is important consideration like people with (1)chronic migraines, (2)perfect perfectionist's near-sighted vision, and (3)loves to play SteetFighter for hours at a time... Let me guess, those ppl don't matter because they are freaks and a small minority.
It is like buying an investment property in Hawaii. My Realtor gets the info from the Seller and sends you pics of the spectacular view, great the beautiful furnishings, perfect floor plan, great workmanship, good location ... And Great Deal! Take my $$$!!
ALL the positives,
The smart buyer would ask the right questions. And research the "too good to be true" details.>>> just to fly there and find that the back of the property is the City's Power Grid Hub. Can you tell yourself "no biggy, I just won't look out the back and pay no attention to the constant BUZZ noise"... Oops
Too good to be true.
Point is, some people's criteria and priorities are different for a home or a phone. We are all different, yes, so we as educated, smart consumers need to do due diligence and research. We count on the professionals (like your Realtor that is suppose to have your best interests in mind...) and their reviews to be both accurate and precise. Forgetting to state that the back of the property is the City Power Grid is not accurate, not precise and plain irresponsible..Same as not mentioning the important negatives of Amoled and then concluding that it is "best screen" -bs."
And for what is the "flickering and subpixel misregistration", pls refer to previous page.
