Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Attachments

  • upload_2015-9-11_18-58-1.png
    upload_2015-9-11_18-58-1.png
    548.9 KB · Views: 595
To me, all the colors of the iPhone are gender-neutral. It really doesn't matter what color your phone is anymore, anyway.

I'd love a Rose Gold 6s Plus, but the lack of a black bezel kills it for me. Maybe next year.
Same thing I think. I'd love rose gold as well (my wedding band has rose gold in it) but the face has to be black to visually fade away. White doesn't cut it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iamMacPerson
I noticed gold 7000 series alluminium looks more yellow than the current gold. This might make a difference between 6 and 6S.
Although, 8 hours away I still hesitate between both, I'm really afraid rose gold looks too pink.. :confused:
 
I noticed gold 7000 series alluminium looks more yellow than the current gold. This might make a difference between 6 and 6S.
Although, 8 hours away I still hesitate between both, I'm really afraid rose gold looks too pink.. :confused:
Thicker anodization is probably what attributes to the more yellowy look.
 
Think of this color choice this way:

It creates this conversation; which is great marketing - it's not too negative either.
It creates distinction; which is great - people will get this color because it's the only way to show people you have the 'newest', which isn't a negative either.
It creates desire for me; which is great - future options for more colors, introduce "product red" for those who want the 'male' design and still something new. And there's a reason for the iPhone 7 to stand out. Worst case scenario, it sells more Apple Cases, I guess, which isn't a negative either.
It creates a statement: Fashion; which is what the Apple Watch introduced, well, actually the iPhone 5C introduced that I guess. That the device is 'personal', and that having the iPhone is a fashion statement, which isn't a negative either.

All good reasons to introduce a 'pink' phone, that in my opinion guys can still buy. I am considering it; and not insecure about myself to ignore it. But my reason to doubt about it is that' it looks more 'pink' than 'gold', and that it looks like it is a weathered color, rather than a natural true gold color. But that's just me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: curtisjacob
Heavy on the metallic pink side with the rose gold color.
I'd prefer a copper color (I believe that is how rose gold is made - copper and gold) I don't think Apple is using any real gold in thier colors. One would think it's expensive but it's not. Watch manufactuers charge the same price per model for stainless steel watches as they do ionic plated black, gold, rose gold, etc watches.
 
This has already been asked. Nope, there's no such thing as a "girly" color. Be bold, buy it and don't look back.

I'm a dude and I'm buying one. Just because life is too short. :cool:
 
It looks more pinkish than I'd expected but its decent. Trust me you won't be less a man if you want to get it. It's your money!

Quite frankly I don't care, you shouldn't either lol.
 
Good God, there are literally 10 other threads on the first page discussing this. Get what you want people! Screw the haters.
 
Also, most people put their phones in cases, so the color doesn't matter. I'll only see the colored Touch ID ring.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.