Chip-Gate. I'm sure I'm the first person to think of this. Right?
I'm convinced you mean "Gate, Gate", or, to be precise, "Gate²"
Think.
About.
It.
OR...
Could it be... "Sili-Gate"?
Chip-Gate. I'm sure I'm the first person to think of this. Right?
Dang hope mine has a Samsung chip or I'm returning it no joke
Says the man who has 2 shares in Apple, not biased in anyway though.Seriously? That many people read MacRumors or other tech sites and will be concerned about this? Jeezus people just enjoy your devices and stop looking for problems!
10 years of VLSI semiconductor design and fabrication, primarily II-VI and III-V but also with some Group 4 experience. I have a master's degree from Stanford in Materials Science and took graduate level courses in semiconductor physics and semiconductor device fabrication. I also have a master's degree in Optical Physics from the University of Arizona.
The size of the die is irrelevant. The mask set (i.e. the schematic of the chip itself) is almost certainly identical between the two suppliers.
It is possible that one chip could run hotter than the other chip. It has to do with the lateral doping profile and transistor geometry and a bunch of other things which probably are different between the suppliers. Of course that's also true for chips from the same supplier. How much different, no one but Apple could know. It could be that they're so similar, the performance is identical. Without a direct statement from Apple, it will forever be idle speculation.
Battery usage is not a constant. It is not perfectly uniform across all the iPhones worldwide. Usage differs (sorry to insult your intelligence by being a typical "spell-out-the-blindingly-obvious" dork).
Don't know if you're serious, but in actual fact every chip has a slightly performance profile. So some are going to be more efficient than others. Chips are "binned" according to their performance and Apple may actually let a lot of variation through, because it costs money to throw away chips and it doesn't care too much about how any particular phone performs.
The operative word here is could. Nobody has yet confirmed that the phones with tsmc chips have worse battery life, performance, overheat etc.I highly doubt it will be noticeable. We could be talking about a couple of minutes. Tops.
But that's within the same process. It is conceivable that someone could get a 16nm TSMC chip that is actually more efficient than a 14nm Samsung. Both Samsung and TSMC have pretty mature processes. Intel sells chips at different clock speeds based on how they are binned. Apple has a single speed, likely set at a conservative point so that they avoid warranty issues.You have no basis for saying that at all. There could be a wide variation in the chips made by the same foundry. It depends on what Apple specifies. Going by how cheap they are with RAM, I'd say there is a wide variation in power usage.
Yeah there's slight variation in chip power consumption on any process but the difference isn't very large, it can't be or Apple would have to lose some of their claimed battery life for false advertisement.. The chips are binned to within certain specifications. But we're talking about a 9% increase in die area. That doesn't just disappear into variance. If the A9 were about half the iPhone's power draw, 5% would be over half an hour. So it is significant.
I probably won't lose sleep at night if I don't know who makes the CPU inside my iPhone… But, if I'm going to pay upwards of $700 for a device, don't I have the right to know who the maker of the major components (like the CPU) is? …And, especially if it doesn't matter, it shouldn't have to be kept a secret until Chipworks reveals all!
I'm not asking for the blueprints for the iPhone so I can build my own—I just feel I should be able to know which company made something as important as the CPU inside my phone.
Probably because it doesn't matter in everyday use.Apple doesn't even tell you how much RAM is in the phone, do you really think they're going to tell you who makes the various components? They don't even publish fairly basic things like clockspeed, the only thing they say is "2x faster", they never tell you actually how fast it is.
I'll take a TSMC chip, thank you. Samsung can go whiz up a rope for all I care. No Samsung anything in my house if I have any choice.
Samsung is fine as a supplier. I just don't care for them as an OEM. Heck, GM supplies BMW with transmissions. I'm not buying a GM car.Hate to break it to you, but you probably have all kinds of Samsung stuff in your house
WOW. Turns out my wife and I have same phone, one runs hot and has been more laggy. I bet this is the reason. How do I find out which chip we have? Will definitely return one. Why Apple would do this is beyond me.
You are missing that it is entirely irrelevant if their performance is near-identicalMaybe this is stupid of me (and it probably is since Apple would know better than me), but would it have killed them to limit one to the 6s and the other to the 6s plus? Are production numbers vastly different? They have to know that these tears owns were going to happen immediately after the devices hit the market. What am I missing?
Maybe this is stupid of me (and it probably is since Apple would know better than me), but would it have killed them to limit one to the 6s and the other to the 6s plus? Are production numbers vastly different? They have to know that these tears owns were going to happen immediately after the devices hit the market. What am I missing?
You are missing that it is entirely irrelevant if their performance is near-identical
I honestly think this is plain and simple marketing reasons. They don't want to plaster these specs on their site for people shopping to do direct number comparisons (which don't mean much anyway) between their device and a competitions.Probably because it doesn't matter in everyday use.
That is a good point. Still had me wondering if both models exhibit these differences and if so how that is a benefit in terms of manufacturing.It doesn't matter to them. They didn't think it'd be a big deal, and frankly it isn't. It sounds like a lot of people are complaining but 99.9% of people don't care which chip they have in their phones, whether they know about the two manufacturers or not. In the scheme of hundreds of millions of units sold, a few thousand overreactive keyboard warriors who post on MacRumors doesn't even register on the outermost periphery of Apple's radar.
How about "nobody-is-going-to-give-a-flying-f***-gate" as long as their phone works. Seriously, this is beyond absurd
Maybe this is stupid of me (and it probably is since Apple would know better than me), but would it have killed them to limit one to the 6s and the other to the 6s plus? Are production numbers vastly different? They have to know that these tears owns were going to happen immediately after the devices hit the market. What am I missing?