I don't mind this too much. I pretty much already exclusively use bluetooth headphones, and with the new powered USB 3 connector, I can hook up the iPhone 7 to a proper DAC for high end listening with my full size headphones. I'd consider the lack of a headphone jack to be nothing more than a mild inconvenience.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 7 and 7 Plus Again Rumored to Feature Smart Connector, but No Stereo Speakers or Thinner Design
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I've had an iPhone since the first model and having to use an adapter for it (at the time no other audio plugs were thin enough to fit) was a huge pain. I have many pairs of earphones but I had only one adapter as they were expensive. So I often forgot to bring it places.
I wouldn't really mind so much if there was a good reason to move away from the 3.5mm jack. But there isn't.
Oh I know what you meant. But that particular adapter did one thing only, it took the same signal, and allowed headphones with plugs too big for the iPhone hole to be used. And I think Apple charged something like $10+ for theirs. It was a completely pointless thing to do, and although there was seemingly a rational explanation for it (Apple was concerned that larger headphones would put too much strain on the connector), the better solution was to re-engineer it so that any headphones could be used.
This is something completely different. Apple is likely introducing new HQ audio capability along with iTunes support, which is one way to spin it. They're probably going to release an industry defining set of bluetooth headphones and earbuds. They're likely going to give away Lightning earbuds that are higher quality than those most people currently use. Adapters will likely enhance the quality of the audio most current users are getting (another marketing point), and Apple will make them reasonably affordable and elegantly styled to be virtually invisible. Lightning headphones will include things like noise cancellation without bulky batteries, and other digital controls not possible with the analogue jack. In other words, so many more options to using the 3.5mm headphone jack than the original iPhone situation. And Apple will have to spin this. And my guess is they will introduce some new exciting feature that they can use to justify reclaiming the space of the old jack.
So yes, there will be some backlash, but isn't there always? You say "Too many people rely on the 3.5mm jack in their phones", but I'll bet Apple has a pretty good idea just how many people that is, and in particular, how many that are using their flagship phones -- because that's all this change initially affects in the first year. And, it might only affect the base 7 customers, and not the Plus customers, thus driving upgrades (though I bet Apple will eliminate it across the lineup to drive wireless adoption). The SE and iPhone 6 will still have 3.5mm jacks for the low end customers who probably use the headphone jacks the most because they can't afford BlueTooth headphones, much less new high end headphones. But the high end Flagship customers may not be as attached to them.
And the backlash may be short lived as other phone makers start dropping the headphone jack to make room for other features too in order to stay competitive with Apple, at least at the flagship level. So Apple sort of has this covered for the people who absolutely can't afford to make the transition -- and there's yet another explanation for the cheapest iPhone Apple ever offered also being almost as functionally featured as the most expensive phone. And for everyone else, it may not be that big of a deal. Certainly not as big a deal as having to buy an adapter simply because their plug wouldn't fit.
Still don't understand the need to remove the headphone jack. Touch still has one at 6.1mm, that's plenty thin.
It's one thing to remove things that are past their time or whatever, like the floppy drive... But there are literally *billions* of devices with 3.5 jacks. It just strikes me as more means to bilk customers.
It's one thing to remove things that are past their time or whatever, like the floppy drive... But there are literally *billions* of devices with 3.5 jacks. It just strikes me as more means to bilk customers.
Out of curiosity...
Since most people that have a nice expensive set of headphones use a SINGLE pair- what is your issue with leaving the adapter on the headphones & forgetting it's there?
Also- you say you're not willing to carry "another" adapter... do you mind listing the myriad adapters that you are apparently currently forced to carry around that have put you in your foul mood??
I hope it doesn't end up looking like that. That camera housing looks dreadful
Imagine if it does look like this? The reaction here would be priceless!!!
I doubt it will be $5, more like $30-50 knowing Apple but still, why should customers have to pay for something that was always integrated with the device?
The difference between removing the headphone jack and the change from 30 pin to Lightning is that Apple always used their own exclusive connectors, it was a pain in the ass for people in within the Apple ecosystem but the 3.5mm headphone jack is an INDUSTRY standard. Simply put, any current Android owner who owns a bunch of earbuds and/or headphones might be less likely to purchase an iPhone 7 if it does in fact eschew the headphone jack. And don't give me the whole "Android phones will follow suit" narrative because believe me, they will relish in the backlash that Apple will deservedly get for eliminating the headphone jack.
[doublepost=1460583036][/doublepost]
iOS 10 needs a complete redesign and substantial new features to get me excited about the platform again. As of now, I'll just assume it'll be another snoozer of an update like iOS 9.
if this is what it is going to look like i am gonna get a Galaxy Edge while waiting for the actual NEW iPhone which is clearly coming out at its 10th year anniversary. this just seems like a "lazy" filler device before their new technology is cheap enough for mass production
Lightning can already be configured to output analogue audio on the fly, but not likely in Apple's best interest with this move. The smart connector seems like it could be used for this purpose, but not likely.
Not unless Apple offers something beneficial for the customer in the way of a new feature that may be used by more customers than are currently using their headphone jack. And you're kidding yourself if you think this is about licensing the Lightning connector to more vendors. Apple is pushing non-proprietary wifi and bluetooth wireless as a standard to eliminate ports and jacks altogether eventually. Lightning is just a way to accommodate those who can't cut the cord.
It's not about the height. By my calculations Apple would have to drop below 4mm thickness to necessitate eliminating the jack due to its diameter. The problem is the internal volume the hardware takes up inside the phone. Adding new hardware features means spreading out what's already in there, and the jack takes up something like 400 cubic mm.
Just, for the love of God, put 32GB of base storage.
That Smart Connector will probably enable Apple's version of wireless charging. People here will go nuts with excitement. I will pass and remain bored as the Palm Pre had that feature years ago and it looked better than anything the competition is doing today.
And yet leaked photos of the current iPhone 6 with the plastic antenna bands proved real.
Just saying.
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Samsung and other manufacturers followed Apple's design philosophy when they decided to remove SD slots. Fast forward to 2016: card slots are back.
And even if they decided to remove it, they would likely fall back on the by they universally used USB-C.
But I admire your confidence and optimism regarding Apple's leadership in the industry. I feel the days with Apple leading the way, are long over. They are offering solid upper middle class products, well tailored to their proprietary software, which works usually quite well as a whole.
But both camps make it sound as if their position is the obvious one and that everybody with a little bit of a brain must surely support their position.
Uh, no. I simply stated my opinion. You are making into something else entirely.
We all have seen time and time again that the info leaked own various sites s almost always accurate. Apple Product launches are boring these days because we already know months in advance!
How each handles their iPhone varies. I experienced no issues with chipping of the chamfered edges.
I am heartened to hear rumours of a return to a glass or sapphire. Sure, I get the redesign cycle, but 7 was 'supposed' to be a major redesign.
Sounds like you need to run Apple diagnostics on your phone from the support website or take it in for repair. Your issues aren't normal and everyone doesn't experience that.
Nothing surprises me here anymore. Just look what Rogifan wrote when the first pics of the iPhone 6 were leaked, which turned out to be really accurate:
But of course, the final product looked soooo much better. Especially when presented in a video with English accent and a white background and flowery piano music.
If "elimination of the headphone jack" is the only new "feature" on the 7 non-plus, Apple is in trouble.
But surely releasing 'the lamest update ever' must count the wrong thing to do for Apple?
If these rumours are true, its incredibly dissapionting.
- Usually a new number means a new design. If this is true, will we also see a 7S using this design? If thats the case, the "6" design will essentially have been used for 4 generations. Thats over the top, for what has been the worst iPhone design so far.
- No headphone jack may have some space saving merits, but for stereo speakers? Does anyone really think they will get hi-fi sound out of this, or true stereo from speakers placed 3 cm from each other?
- Is faster and thinner alone enough of a reason to upgrade?
- The dual lens system, if resembling these images, is an aesthetical disaster. Some times form over function is okay. Does Jony Ive even care any more?
