Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As an additional backup to iCloud, a few years ago I bought a NAS - the Synology companion app for the iPhone (DS Photo) automatically uploads all my media to the NAS when I'm on my home network.

Hi, one question about this setup:
I guess that you have optimised storage turned on on the iPhone, right?
So the DS Photo App only uploads optimised photos so it is not a real backup of the original sized data?
How did you do the automatic part? With a Geofence inside the application? Does this get triggered when on wifi only so it does not consume mobile data?

And what is the option in the app? I see a photo backup option but it only lets me select photos downloaded from my NAS not the camera roll for example.
Thanks for your help!
 
Hi, one question about this setup:
I guess that you have optimised storage turned on on the iPhone, right?
So the DS Photo App only uploads optimised photos so it is not a real backup of the original sized data?
How did you do the automatic part? With a Geofence inside the application? Does this get triggered when on wifi only so it does not consume mobile data?

And what is the option in the app? I see a photo backup option but it only lets me select photos downloaded from my NAS not the camera roll for example.
Thanks for your help!

  • I guess that you have optimised storage turned on on the iPhone, right? Yes, for iCloud Photos to keep local storage use down.
  • So the DS Photo App only uploads optimised photos so it is not a real backup of the original sized data? No, it does full res backups and includes all the original metadata (locations, camera info etc).
  • How did you do the automatic part? With a Geofence inside the application? Yep with a GeoFence.
  • Does this get triggered when on wifi only so it does not consume mobile data? There's an option within the app to use WiFi only, and you can choose to limit it to only photo backup.
  • And what is the option in the app? I see a photo backup option but it only lets me select photos downloaded from my NAS not the camera roll for example. I set mine up years ago. But I think you select Photo Backup in the side menu. Click the arrow pointing up in the top right hand corner. Log in. And follow the steps. If you choose "Backup all photos" it will do your whole camera roll.


Hope you get it sorted. It's a great setup once it's up and running. No space worries on the handset, and piece of mind having both cloud and local NAS backups of precious photo and video memories.
 
haha Darn it! You beat me. Are you going to get the 7? I love my 4S although the battery has seen better days.

I'm going for an iPhone 7 black, since my cuurent iPhone 4 is black.
Jet Black won't do any justice for as glossy black is prone to have a micro-scratches & fingerprint magnets.

It's going to be a huge upgrade for the both of us! Haha.
 
Chicken & egg. Makes no sense to have up to ALL of the content in the iTunes store at 4K for :apple:TV before there is a 4K:apple:TV to play any of it. We did not have abundant CDs available before CD players, DVDs available before DVD players, Blu Ray discs before Blu Ray players, etc. Closer to "home", we do not have a single app in the app store today ready to take advantage of whatever is unique about the A10, but the A10 is coming anyway.

Hardware must lead. Hardware arrives and software catches up. OR, at best, hardware arrives and some software is made available the same day that capitalizes on the hardware advancement.

If you look through the iTunes store, not everything is available at 1080p either but that didn't stop Apple from rolling out a 1080p :apple:TV years ago. Not everything is available at 720p but that didn't stop the original :apple:TV from having 720p capabilities way back in 2007. Launching a 4K-capable :apple:TV would be no different than launching every :apple:TV before it without the store being full of content able to maximize it's hardware. That 4K:apple:TV would still play the 1080p or 720p or SD options to their MAX, just as a 1080p :apple:TV could play the 720p and SD files to their MAX when it rolled out.

Apple can't control this particular third party software (availability). But Apple has full control of the hardware they want to roll out. Launching hardware capable of "more" is, basically, what Apple does. This is no different. Hardware must come first. It actually makes no business sense the other way.
Bandwidth is an issue too.
 
There's about 50 bits of spin in support of sticking with 1080p vs. adding the 4K option... and about 50 of them were the exact same reasons posted again and again for sticking with 720p when some of us expressed desire for 1080p. Of course, all that "720p is good enough" sentiment seemed to evaporate as soon as Apple rolled out the :apple:TV "now with 1080p" even though internet bandwidth everywhere was not upgraded to handle those much larger file sizes either. It will be no different with a 4K:apple:TV.

Somehow people imagine- or spin- that a 4K:apple:TV would force everyone to only watch 4K content. It would not... just as a 1080p :apple:TV did not force the "720p is good enough crowd" to watch only 1080p. In fact, an 8K:apple:TV wouldn't force the "720p is good enough crowd" to watch, download, store or do anything different either. It's just better hardware capable of "more" for those that might want "more." Those completely content with "less" than it's maximum potential could keep enjoying exactly what they enjoy now. Those lacking bandwidth to stream 4K could keep downloading 1080p, 720p or SD... exactly as they do now. Those not able to see the difference wouldn't have to try- just keep watching whichever video option is subjectively ideal on their TV now. Those who do not yet own a 4K set would not have to throw out a perfectly good HD set as hardware capable of more would just feed their 1080p or 720p set a signal that displays correctly for what they have. Etc.

What it would do is let those wanting an Apple product attached to their new 4K TV be able to feed some 4K to that TV get what they want too. It would also fix the only broken link in an all-Apple chain of 4K content capture, editing, rendering and then "just works" flowing to their 4K TV. As is everything in that chain can be done with Apple hardware & software... except the flow from a 4K movie stored in iTunes to a 4K TV. This one link in that chain is still stuck at 1080p when everything else Apple offers has already moved on. Fix that and it affects no one happy with the "as is" at all... it simply lets another segment of consumers join our little party.
 
Last edited:
There's about 50 bits of spin in support of sticking with 1080p vs. adding the 4K option... and about 50 of them were the exact same reasons posted again and again for sticking with 720p when some of us expressed desire for 1080p. Of course, all that "720p is good enough" sentiment seemed to evaporate as soon as Apple rolled out the :apple:TV "now with 1080p" even though internet bandwidth everywhere was not upgraded to handle those much larger file sizes either. It will be no different with a 4K:apple:TV.

Somehow people imagine- or spin- that a 4K:apple:TV would force everyone to only watch 4K content. It would not... just as a 1080p :apple:TV did not force the "720p is good enough crowd" to watch only 1080p. In fact, an 8K:apple:TV wouldn't force the "720p is good enough crowd" to watch, download, store or do anything different either. It's just better hardware capable of "more" for those that might want "more." Those completely content with "less" than it's maximum potential could keep enjoying exactly what they enjoy now. Those lacking bandwidth to stream 4K could keep downloading 1080p, 720p or SD... exactly as they do now. Those not able to see the difference wouldn't have to try- just keep watching whichever video option is subjectively ideal on their TV now. Those who do not yet own a 4K set would not have to throw out a perfectly good HD set as hardware capable of more would just feed their 1080p or 720p set a signal that displays correctly for what they have. Etc.

What it would do is let those wanting an Apple product attached to their new 4K TV be able to feed some 4K to that TV get what they want too. It would also fix the only broken link in an all-Apple chain of 4K content capture, editing, rendering and then "just works" flowing to their 4K TV. As is everything in that chain can be done with Apple hardware & software... except the flow from a 4K movie stored in iTunes to a 4K TV. This one link in that chain is still stuck at 1080p when everything else Apple offers has already moved on. Fix that and it affects no one happy with the "as is" at all... it simply lets another segment of consumers join our little party.
Very well put.
 
Sales figures and research may have given apple the impression that the vast majority don't care about a camera bump, because: either people use a case or they just don't care.
I know nobody who cares about the bump.

You need to talk to more people then
 
Straight from the Tech Spec section... no 60fps 4K
Video Recording
  • 4K video recording at 30 fps
  • 1080p HD video recording at 30 fps or 60 fps
  • 720p HD video recording at 30 fps

My iPhone SE can definitely record at 1080p at 120 fps with MoviePro (60 with Apple's Camera app.)

4K video is at 30 fps.

720p goes up to 240 fps.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.