They don't. But you do. You could make a fortune waterproofing iPhones!They go thinner (it is always something attractive), becouse they have no idea how to go water-proof.
They don't. But you do. You could make a fortune waterproofing iPhones!They go thinner (it is always something attractive), becouse they have no idea how to go water-proof.
Then why are so few people buying the extra-thick (Android) phones with 3+ days battery life? Not that there seem to exist many.
Are you saying there only a few good Android phones and among these none has a three-day battery life? Or that there only a few Android phones with a three-day battery life (and none of those are good)?Because they are otherwise underspecced and/or come with outdated and/or horrible custom UI that never sees updates? If someone made a waterproof and thick (stock) Android with great battery life, good camera, wireless charging and NFC, I'd be interested in that.
I'm interested in the 6S, but only as a spectator. My 6+ will last me another year, so the iPhone 7 will be my next phone purchase.Why are we already talking about the iPhone 7 specs when the iPhone 6S hasn't even launched yet? Aren't we jumping the gun just a bit???
Are you saying there only a few good Android phones and among these none has a three-day battery life? Or that there only a few Android phones with a three-day battery life (and none of those are good)?
And what does this say about user demand for three-day-battery-life phones?
Those phones are usually mid range and not flagship also ugly.Then why are so few people buying the extra-thick (Android) phones with 3+ days battery life? Not that there seem to exist many.
Sony are the closest as they are the only manufacturer which offer 2 day battery life and flagship specs including waterproof.
Yeah, I don't want a Google or MS phone. I just want Apple to give back to its loyal customers for a change, rather than squeeze every penny out of us.
I imagine they do indeed have an idea, but I am surprised they haven't chosen to go that route yet.they have no idea how to go water-proof.
why would they? more money from out of warranty water damage replacementsI imagine they do indeed have an idea, but I am surprised they haven't chosen to go that route yet.
With the modern iPhone being a practically solid state unit, a very small percentage of customers would be bothered by not being able to disassemble their phone quite as easily, but a much larger percentage of customers would welcome not having to worry about their daily companion getting soaked and damaged in a surprise rainstorm.
Plus, the Lightning port is already certified waterproof, so they simply need to purchase one of the companies that owns an established electronics waterproof coating process.
How thin they will go? Here’s the specs of iPhone 103S:
![]()
-Credit card size and thickness (Johnny is laughing manically from Heaven).
-Simple, magical design.
-Battery life: 83 years on standby, 1 day of active usage. Self-recharge.
-Waterproof, shockproof. Flexible.
-Apple A187 chip.
-Unlimited memory capacity (or 16 GB base storage for entry model).
-Revolutionary, lensless Retina Hologram projection (Samsung will call it sHologram in their next year's Galaxy S184 Fringe+).
-SIRI, rebranded SELMA - finally a truly useful digital assistant, with motherly personality (or you can download more flirty Cortana from the Appstore).
Available September 19, 2193 (or slightly sooner, if you are police Captain of Fugitive Retrieval Section).
They are going to remove the headphone jack and make it slightly thicker than the lighting port. It will ship with new lightning beats earbuds.
I wonder how many of the people here wanting more battery life in a thicker package actually walk their talk and get battery cases for their iPhones ...![]()
Why are you giving an $600+ device to a child?I'd actually be okay with it being considerably thicker if it meant my kids would have a harder time breaking it.
#ThinEnough!
I guess Apple knows pretty well how much more they could sell with the 50% more battery offer and how much more they could sell by making the phone thinner. And the thinner phone won out that contest. How many people compare battery life when purchasing a phone and how many people just look at the device and how it feels in the hand?At this point all I really care about is battery life. An extra millimeter of space in my pocket is meaningless. Why doesn't Apple understand this? Must be a marketing thing; however, if they could increase the battery life by 50%, for example, imagine how well they could market that against their competitors? I know of many people who would be more inclined to purchase an iPhone if this were the case.