It’s apparent you’re probably thinking way too hard about all of this.
Why would an Air replace an iPad when it’s screen is only .4 inches bigger than the 16 you already had?
If you’re trying to limit your screen time just commit to trying to do that. Making up this complex situation to solve just seems like a stressful experiment that likely won’t change anything.
I’m genuinely trying to help.
I've already explained this in depth in the post you're responding to. It has nothing to do with screen time. It's about function and minimalism. Or, quality over quantity.
It's really weird how stuck people are in thinking one specific way.
I've said, I use an iPad mostly in the house and an iPhone mostly outside the house. Because I know so many people who only have one device, I want to see if I could get rid of one of these. Clearly, it's not possible to get rid of a phone so the iPad is on the chopping block.
Had you grasped the concept, your question would be -
why do feel like you can't just get rid of the iPad and rely solely on the iPhone 16? And I'd say, that's a legitimate question. And the reason for that is that, when I'm home and want to use a hand held device for web browsing, watching videos, responding to emails, being productive, etc., the 16 is just a little bit too small.
I still feel like the iPhone Mini is the best phone, but in order to have a little more freedom to enjoy media and be productive, it itself does not have sufficient screen space. I think the Air is a good (not great) compromise between the iPhone Mini and iPad.
I'm not really sure how this is so difficult for some people to comprehend. Maybe you're coming at this from a different angle with your own notions of how you use your devices and presuming I would be doing the same.