Are you telling me that if Apple makes a phone that's quantifiably and qualitatively inferior to previous and existing models then people won't value it as much?
I don't want to turn this into another one of those threads but in exchange for video-out and the 0.5x lens (which Apple still haven't fixed the barrel distortion on, even on Pro models) you're getting a larger display without the traditional gain in mass, a faster processor, 50% more RAM, a tougher build quality and better 5G reception.It should be $200 less than the regular iPhone, not $200 more. It has less capabilities. People will not pay more for literally less of a phone in material and specs. If it was $200 less it would be selling well.
This. People scream about how apple needs to bring the mini back, the Air, maybe even the plus. THEY DON'T SELL WELL. I am sure there's "plenty" of people who want one of these phones, but if they think they can make more money by axing them, making a different phone, etc, its worth it. They don't make decisions to create a phone lightly nor discontinue one lightly. If the mini or plus sold well, they would still be here. That's all that matters.
No need to justify... Reason is obvious.Time for my regular comment: Will someone try to justify bringing back the mini in this thread?
I'm not sympathizing with them, as much as I am saying it makes sense why they discontinue products with smaller profit margins. Businesses that do not do this, go out of business. You don't invest capital into products that don't sell as well as very similar products.Yes, let's all sympathize with the 4 trillion dollar company's quest for ever more profit growth over any consideration for the user.
Don't like not having a smaller size iPhone? Stop whining and build your own OS and phone.
The growth of the AAPL share price is all that matters.
You mean premium couch.This phone reminds me of "decorative" yet uncomfortable couches / chairs for your living space.
Looks like this is the new iPhone 5C.
With Apple's hardware margins and other costs, the estimated break-even point for Apple for the iPhone Air is likely close to $800. That's considering factory costs (components, labor, assembly, shipping, import duties, warranties) + operating expenses (R&D, marketing, logistics, etc.).It should be $200 less than the regular iPhone, not $200 more. It has less capabilities. People will not pay more for literally less of a phone in material and specs. If it was $200 less it would be selling well.
I'm not sympathizing with them, as much as I am saying it makes sense why they discontinue products with smaller profit margins. Businesses that do not do this, go out of business. You don't invest capital into products that don't sell as well as very similar products.
The values are based on trade-in offers for phones in "good" condition. You cannot buy an Air for that price unless you run a business that accepts trade-ins.So where does one find one of these near 50% off Airs? I need to buy one for research purposes....
Article states depreciation not resell price. I'm assuming the depreciation is based on a trade in value. Selling or trading the phone to a company that will then resell it or refurbish it and resell it at a profit. Not directly to a consumer/end user. Not resell value. I could be wrong but like most have mentioned they aren't finding 10 week old iPhone they can buy at those discounts off retail.where can i get an used iphone 17 for 35% off or an Air for 44% off?
We all know this is going to happen, no matter what!Time for my regular comment: Will someone try to justify bringing back the mini in this thread?
“It’s a success” is what the collective voices from iPhone Air owners advocate since its launch.
When will acceptance sink in?