Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Article states depreciation not resell price. I'm assuming the depreciation is based on a trade in value. Selling or trading the phone to a company that will then resell it or refurbish it and resell it at a profit. Not directly to a consumer/end user. Not resell value. I could be wrong but like most have mentioned they aren't finding 10 week old iPhone they can buy at those discounts off retail.
Article title is misleading and disingenuous then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JGIGS
Apple has been spending mucho $$$ to convince us that more cameras = a better phone. Then you come out with the Air that looks like a 16e...
 
  • Like
Reactions: bmark
What was the point of this phone again? What’s really weird is all the Apple bloggers/podcasters who criticized the company in the past for being to obsessed with ‘thinness’ didn’t seem to have any problem with this phone and in many cases defended it. But all the signs point to it being a flop.
 
I'm not sympathizing with them, as much as I am saying it makes sense why they discontinue products with smaller profit margins. Businesses that do not do this, go out of business. You don't invest capital into products that don't sell as well as very similar products.
Exactly. Apple has a hurdle rate and if a product doesn’t meet or exceed it it’s time to drop it. That is separate from whether the Air is a good product; which strictly a buyer decision. Apple experience with the Air will influence future product decisions and market assumptions.

The trade in / resale numbers are a bit misleading because they need to leave room for their markup. If you assume a 44% drop and a ~50% margin, prices would more likely reflect around ~20% drop at retail. That’s likely only slightly better than Apple’s typically 15% cheaper refurb pricing when it becomes available.
 
Time for my regular comment: Will someone try to justify bringing back the mini in this thread?
I'll be that guy. I don't think the mini will make a come back, nor would it likely sell much better than the Air, but I do think it makes more sense in the line up because it offers a more beneficial form factor change from the rest of the line up than the Air does. The Air is still a big phone just thinner and lighter which it seems most consumers don't care much about. Like it's not going to fit that much more easily in your pocket or hand vs the non max models. A mini on the other hand would, especially if you like using a device one handed and you have small hands. Bad battery life out of the gate with the 12 mini and not having a pro model also hurt the mini big time. If there was a current mini pro with good battery life I would be extremely tempted.
 
Time for my regular comment: Will someone try to justify bringing back the mini in this thread?
Would be interesting to know which type sold the fewest: Mini, Plus or Air. I suspect the order in terms of profit per phone goes Mini<Plus<Air, but I haven't considered the R&D investments in that assumption
exactly, no one believes this BS. Even on Ebay or wherever, if I can get an iPhone Air at 44%, please let me know, I'll take one right now.

Lol yeah right. If I can get an iPhone air for 40% off right now, I'll buy one to keep as a secondary phone.... This article is just designed to feed the loliphoneair crowd

So where does one find one of these near 50% off Airs? I need to buy one for research purposes....

These are the trade-in values. The companies that buy these then sell them on a a profit (probably in the $800-900 region, depending on condition). People would likely make more money cashing out their phones by selling them privately, but a lot of people don't want the hassle of the risk of being scammed so they would rather take a bigger financial hit by selling to a reputable trade-in centre. Personally I will be buying iPhones from trade-in centres going forward - got my iPhone 15 in January (3.5 months after launch, <2 months from activation) in pristine condition for £599 (25% discount on the UK rrp); <50 cycles on the battery/100% battery health with ~8 months of the Apple warranty left and a full 12 month warranty from the trade in centre that even covered me if the original owner comitted insuance fraud by declaring the phone lost/stolen and getting it blocked.
 
It should be $200 less than the regular iPhone, not $200 more. It has less capabilities. People will not pay more for literally less of a phone in material and specs. If it was $200 less it would be selling well.
I hate that we live in a world where function has trumped form completely and people can't conceive of design having any value. Remember the first gen macbook Air? It was expensive as a Macbook Pro, but it absolutely sucked in comparison. And the "more functional" base macbook was faster for much cheaper. But it was super thin, super light and cool looking.

The iPhone Air is the best designed phone apple has made since the X, hands down. And it will be the future of the platform for the base models. The early adopters are just subsidizing the R&D.
 
iPhone Air 1.0 is a failure. Terrible speaker at a premium price.

iPhone 17 is 12 grams heavier (not much at all) and $200 less. It is thriving while the Air fails.

iPhone Air 2.0 will be a much bigger success.
 
I never said that would be new, just massively improved over the thick, heavy, flat sided with sharp edges like we have had since the 12. The iphone 6 series through the Xs was a much much much better design. Light weight with rounded sides is the premium phone design. Apple did that in the past and should do it again.
To each their own of course. I prefer the square edges of the current and recent designs. Maybe because my first iPhone was the 4s. I’ve had a new phone every year since then and there have been none that I disliked or had any problems with but I like the squares better.
 
Both phones sound crap so the speaker isn't an issue
That doesn't sound like an informed opinion (see what I did there?). An earpiece speaker will never be a decent main speaker and the base 17 not only sounds better, but can hit higher volumes. It also performs better because it throttles less. It's a much less compromised phone for less money.
 
It should be $200 less than the regular iPhone, not $200 more. It has less capabilities. People will not pay more for literally less of a phone in material and specs. If it was $200 less it would be selling well.
I've stopped caring about the generations of iPhone at all - Apple should just stop giving them names at all.

I switched to buying used. The hardware is close enough to identical - I can't tell the difference between today's iPhones and the ones from 5 years ago.

I buy iPhones based on a simple formula - price/<time I expect it to be supported for>. I take a look at the RAM and CPU in the phone and compare it against what they're selling today. If the RAM and CPU is still available on new phones, they'll be supporting whatever I'm looking at for at least 5 more years.

So... really, the low end phones didn't lead to me buying newer low-end phones. It lead to me deciding that the old used phones are a great value at 50+% off.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I think the Air was simply:

1) to ensure they could manufacture a thin phone in quantities, in preparation for their folding iPhone
2) to drum up excitement with consumers who are tired of the same old releases every iPhone season
 
This isn’t surprising at all, especially in places like the United States where bigger tends to sell better. And it’s not limited to iPhones either. You see it on the roads where people purchase huge vehicles when they most likely do not need them. Heck, I remember when the 3DS was the active handheld at the time, Nintendo America almost didn’t even release regular sized n3DS because consumers wanted “big” (3DS XL) devices. I’m sure the 12.9” iPad sells better than the 11” and 16” MacBook Pro sells better than the 14”. People want big things and the data shows.

I’m happy Apple released the iPhone Air regardless of what’s happening right now. I haven’t seen a difference at all going from my 16 Pro Max to the Air which probably means my use case matches exactly what the Air offers.
 
I'll be that guy. I don't think the mini will make a come back, nor would it likely sell much better than the Air, but I do think it makes more sense in the line up because it offers a more beneficial form factor change from the rest of the line up than the Air does. The Air is still a big phone just thinner and lighter which it seems most consumers don't care much about. Like it's not going to fit that much more easily in your pocket or hand vs the non max models. A mini on the other hand would, especially if you like using a device one handed and you have small hands. Bad battery life out of the gate with the 12 mini and not having a pro model also hurt the mini big time. If there was a current mini pro with good battery life I would be extremely tempted.
"It seems most consumers don't care much about"

Same could be said for the mini's form factor.... People don't want to consume all of their content on such a tiny screen.....Also you cannot have a pro model mini with good battery life, it's impossible to fit a battery big enough to handle pro features.... That's the thing mini fans don't seem to get... You're going to be severely compromised one way or another if you want that small form factor..... And that's why it will never sell enough for Apple to bother
 
I absolutely love my Air. I have always been a Pro guy and get the latest phone every year. I decided to try something DIFFERENT this year after realizing a) I rarely take pictures b) rarely use my speakerphone (big AirPod Pro user) and c) my aging eyes wanted a larger screen than the Pro but smaller than the Pro Max. Honestly, the biggest problem I have with my Air is the frequent "Oh sh*t" moments when I think I have left my phone behind and then I reach down to my short pocket and realize the phone is present and safe! It is so light it is difficult to tell if it is in your pocket sometimes. And this is with a simple case and Magbak wallet attached (which has been a game changer for me - love the combo!!!)
 
where can i get an used iphone 17 for 35% off or an Air for 44% off?
Not 44% off. But still a big drop, IMO.


Mint Unlocked iPhone Air Space Black 1TB w/ Apple Bumper and Apple External Battery $1000

Retails for $1399, so that's a savings of 28.52%

Add in the Apple Bumper ($39) and Apple External Battery ($99) and that's 35%.

If you have sales tax in your state, you're pretty much at 44% off vs Apple's retail price.
 
Last edited:
“It’s a success” is what the collective voices from iPhone Air owners advocate since its launch.

When will acceptance sink in?
Maybe they're still in the denial stage. In a couple months they'll move to the anger stage, then the bargaining, followed by the depression stage. So it'll take some time before they get to acceptance stage.
 
26.1–47.7% depreciation after 10 weeks? That, folks, is why I haven’t bought a new iPhone since the 6S. I’m very happy trailing a few years behind and saving thousands over those who upgrade every year.
Most carrier deals will give you up to $1000 for your recent iPhone Trade-in, so every 36 months I get a new iPhone Pro Max for just a few hundred out of pocket. Since I don't switch carriers every other day, it seems to make the most sense to me.
 
Yes, let's all sympathize with the 4 trillion dollar company's quest for ever more profit growth over any consideration for the user.

Don't like not having a smaller size iPhone? Stop whining and build your own OS and phone.

The growth of the AAPL share price is all that matters.
Respectfully, that’s not what I got out of the post from @Mactech20

Companies have to build products that appeal to the most people possible.
Doing so is in complete consideration for the users.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.