Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The actual reason was so they could make the device thinner for the Z7, but the audience didn’t mind as the display over the camera was just a kind of ugly mash of pixels.
I think it was more the patent issue and them having less time to figure out a workaround than it was the device being thinner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
I'll believe it when I see it. It's vaporware right now and considering how horrifically late they are to the party I would hope that they do a foldable better than anyone has done thus far.

I don't want to have a "1st gen product that will see dramatic improvements in the future." Or "A good start for Apple in the foldable market." I want a lights out first gen product that crushes everyone else's foldable.
Yea, foldable phones have really crushed Apple’s business. Their profit last quarter was inexcusable.

It’s shame they have been dominated so much by this huge foldable market and lost out on so much profit. I mean, who down want a plastic screen with a crease down the middle?

How will they ever recover.
 
There’s a 16 MP under display on RedMagic phones and they are still crap. A few more MP will not overcome the inherent compromises of this approach. And with their whole centerstage upgrades this year, I doubt we will be even using the whole 24 MP sensor on any given shot. A foldable phone will always be one of compromises, but this may be one too many.
Out of all the compromises this device may or may not have, you'd say this would be the straw that breaks the camel's back?

The only use case I can think of for this inner display camera is video conferencing, and unless you're in a one on one meeting you're a small rectangle on someone else's screen, the quality will probably be good enough for that. For selfies, you'd use the outer display's camera or, better yet, the main cameras.
 


Apple's first foldable iPhone will feature an industry-first 24-megapixel under-screen camera built into the inner display, according to the latest JP Morgan equity research report seen by MacRumors.

Under-display camera technology has been used on some Android phones, but they tend to have lower resolution sensors (4 or 8 megapixels, for example) because the image quality suffers due to being behind display layers.

However, the JP Morgan forecast also suggests Apple has made some compromises to keep the foldable device compact, such as a lack of LiDAR and optical image stabilization.

Apple's foldable iPhone is expected to include a dual-lens rear camera, with a front-facing camera for both folded and unfolded states, according to Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman recently corroborated reports that the device will have four cameras consisting of one front camera, one inner camera, and two rear cameras. Prolific Weibo-based leaker Digital Chat Station claims that the rear dual lenses will be 48 megapixels each.

Other sources have claimed that the inner display features an under-screen camera, while the outer display – in the device's folded state – will have a punch-hole camera. Apple is reportedly relying on Touch ID integrated into the side button instead of Face ID for biometric authentication.


FOUR CAMERAS!!! Will the rear have three each?! lol this is insane. The compromises will be significant I think, so while it will be cool to own and show off I think I’ll stick with pro max line and see how things unfold (pun intended)…

There are so many options as far as cameras are concerned, they probably have a zillion prototypes in the lab…outside cameras with punch-hole inside with punch one outside with punch one outside with Under display etc etc…

I have faith with all these options, that Apple has the expertise to choose the correct option…

But yeah I can see me being day one on iPhold but then just return it before 14 days lol

…huge piece is no more Face ID (what camera would get it?? lol), so Touch ID back after saying how much more secure faceID is (at least I think Apple publicly said this)….hmm I always felt Touch ID was pretty secure and someways better (faster to unlock from pocket for example)…
 
Yea, foldable phones have really crushed Apple’s business. Their profit last quarter was inexcusable.

It’s shame they have been dominated so much by this huge foldable market and lost out on so much profit. I mean, who down want a plastic screen with a crease down the middle?

How will they ever recover.

Your understanding of business is top notch.

There is a huge foldable market or Apple wouldn't be getting in it. Do you think these companies are making them for the fun of it? Apple sees they are missing out on a huge profit generator for them which is why they are getting into the foldable business. If there was no profit behind it they would ignore it all together.
 
As a long time Pro Max user, I’m nervous how many compromise this thing will require. Overall I’m still looking forward to seeing how Apple tackles this. Internal screen durability will be the biggest factor for me.
 
I'll believe it when I see it. It's vaporware right now and considering how horrifically late they are to the party I would hope that they do a foldable better than anyone has done thus far.

I don't want to have a "1st gen product that will see dramatic improvements in the future." Or "A good start for Apple in the foldable market." I want a lights out first gen product that crushes everyone else's foldable.
Apple’s first gen products are always advisable to skip, usually the first 2-3 generations as well since fixing issues takes at least 18 months.
 
Looking forward to replacing iPad Pro and iPhone Pro with Fold. More compromise, but less to carry devices to carry/charge/... Total price is likely not going to be any less.
 
[…]

Under-display camera technology has been used on some Android phones, but they tend to have lower resolution sensors (4 or 8 megapixels, for example) because the image quality suffers due to being behind display

[…]

Its not industry first, let me introduce you to the year 2020

ZTE Axon 20 5G with a 32MP under display front camera.
see above.
 
I know the term "under display" sounds sexy... but it just means there's something covering the camera.

I don't see how anything in front of the lens of a camera can compete with an unobstructed lens.

But I guess we'll find out.

😎
The retina has layers of biological tissue (e.g., blood vessels, interneurons, etc.) in the light path to the rods and cones. This is overcome by fancy information processing (e.g., you do not have a blind spot where the optic disk is located because the nervous system fills in the missing information). Perhaps apple will do something similar to mitigate the degraded optical image.

Still, fancy camera or no, I am just not finding this foldable screen an appealing concept. Flexing electronics is always going to cause problems and I just can't tolerate the crease. I wish Apple would work on an iPhone model with two separate flat screens joined together by an ultra-precise mechanical hinge. Flexible screens should be saved for for static curved surfaces, like arm rings meant to display more information than a mere watch.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
The retina has layers of biological tissue (e.g., blood vessels, interneurons, etc.) in the light path to the rods and cones. This is overcome by fancy information processing (e.g., you do not have a blind spot where the optic disk is located because the nervous system fills in the missing information).

Yeah I understand that.

My point is... not having something covering the lens has got to be better than having something covering the lens.

I have no doubt that Apple will be applying all sorts of image processing magic and machine learning to fix any distortions that come from having a pixel-array covering the lens.

But they wouldn't have to do that if they didn't put a pixel-array covering the lens!

🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: VulchR
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.