Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why?

Be specific.
Google and Samsung are going 16 GB ram because of the LLM they'll be using on device.
It will be interesting to see what Apple come up with in this regard, maybe I'll be back in the iPhone camp in time for the next phone 😁
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeard331
In all seriousness though, LLMs take up tons of RAM, so being able to run them on devices with only 8GB of RAM is actually a legitimate accomplishment. Macs can access virtual memory swap whereas iPhones cannot, so physical RAM is more important on the phone than it is on the desktop. This does not, however, excuse Apple from still shipping 8GB on any Mac today, Pro or not. I expect M4 Macs will start shipping with 12GB of RAM.

Presumably the LLM data could be handled by the iPhone using Extended Virtual Addressing
 
Where are we getting this fact about how Apple Intelligence requiring a minimum of 8GB?

Yes, I get that, so far, the devices that support it all have 8GB RAM or more.

But Apple has not stated Apple Intelligence RAM requirements outright (?) and could be limiting support to 15 Pro/Max and better for no reason (other than incentivizing upgrading).

Is this a fact or just Gurman and his peers guessing?
 
If you think Apple will have to discontinue the iPhone 15 because it cannot run AI when a sub-$500 iPhone SE 4 can, then Apple would have to discontinue the iPhone 14 as well since it would be an over-$500 iPhone that also cannot run AI, unless you think Apple will drop the price of the iPhone 14 below that of the iPhone SE 4.

Right now, Apple has the iPhone 13 priced starting at $599. I don't see Apple reducing the starting price of the iPhone 14, currently at $699, to $449 or less when Apple historically dropped them by $100 increments.
Since the SE4 is rumoured to be based on the iPhone 14, I don't see the iPhone 14 staying in the lineup once the SE4 arrives. I think we will see some kind of shakeup of the lineup, rather than direct replacements down the line, but I don't have a good guess at how it will look. But, guessing that new products will be more expensive than we hope, is usually accurate. I'm guessing the SE4 will not be as cheap as the current SE.

It may be that the lineup won't fully make sense until next fall when the rumoured 17 Air shows up. It seems reasonable that adding that phone also requires some sort of modification to the lineup logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Apple$
I would love this phone but cannot wait until next year so will buy the regular 16 next month as an upgrade from my 2020 SE.

It looks like this SE will probably save its owners £300 against a 16 but they will lose one of the rear cameras and the dynamic island.
 
If you think Apple will have to discontinue the iPhone 15 because it cannot run AI when a sub-$500 iPhone SE 4 can, then Apple would have to discontinue the iPhone 14 as well since it would be an over-$500 iPhone that also cannot run AI, unless you think Apple will drop the price of the iPhone 14 below that of the iPhone SE 4.

Right now, Apple has the iPhone 13 priced starting at $599. I don't see Apple reducing the starting price of the iPhone 14, currently at $699, to $449 or less when Apple historically dropped them by $100 increments.
They actually might remove all old models from sale... like you say, it would cause all kinds of issues.
 
Where are we getting this fact about how Apple Intelligence requiring a minimum of 8GB?

Yes, I get that, so far, the devices that support it all have 8GB RAM or more.

But Apple has not stated Apple Intelligence RAM requirements outright (?) and could be limiting support to 15 Pro/Max and better for no reason (other than incentivizing upgrading).

Is this a fact or just Gurman and his peers guessing?
Actually, they did, or at least as close as any Apple exec is going to get:

 
  • Like
Reactions: the future
Having 8GB as a requirement for running AI is not the same as AI taking up 8GB of RAM. Clearly, Apple believes that the product needs 8GB to run AI together with whatever else it needs to run.

I do think we will see a spec bump of the base Macbooks soon, however I wouldn't put it past Apple to move to 12 GB and not 16.
I would be surprised if the base Macbook does not goes go to at least 12gb of memory. I cannot image it will have the same amount of memory as the iPhone SE, with both being announced around the same time early next year.
 
Where are we getting this fact about how Apple Intelligence requiring a minimum of 8GB?

Yes, I get that, so far, the devices that support it all have 8GB RAM or more.

But Apple has not stated Apple Intelligence RAM requirements outright (?) and could be limiting support to 15 Pro/Max and better for no reason (other than incentivizing upgrading).

Is this a fact or just Gurman and his peers guessing?
It's a reasonable and educated assumption following a fairly straightforward logical argument.

  1. The iPhone 15 Pro is the only iPhone with 8GB of RAM.
  2. Apple Intelligence only runs on an iPhone 15 Pro.
  3. Apple Intelligence runs on all devices with an M1 chip.
  4. All M1 devices have 8GB of RAM or more.
  5. The M1 chip has the exact same Neural Engine as the A14 chip running at the same speed.
If the M1 can run Apple Intelligence on the same Neural Engine that the A14 has, but A15 and A16-equipped iPhones with faster Neural Engines cannot run Apple Intelligence, then the limiting factor is RAM, not chip performance.

As for Apple intentionally holding Apple Intelligence back, why just the iPhone? Why not limit it to to M2 or higher iPads and Macs?
 
They have to screw up this product somehow, otherwise it will cannibalize other iPhone models.
Otherwise it will probably be the very first iPhone I buy.
This. They have an army of what my dad calls “bean counters” (and that I call “business school classmates”). The cannibalization would be off the charts, and there’s no way it ends up being profit maximizing. Something just isn’t right with this rumor.

On a less important note, it would decimate resale values on older devices. I doubt Apple makes a ton off of their older iPhone refurbs, but they do make some, and this would nuke that business too. Moreover, if you kill trade-in values, it becomes that much harder to step-sell someone to the “Pro” line, so there’s a knock-on sales and profit effect too.

There’s no way this rumor is accurate exactly as written.
 
Because Apple decided they wanted to keep it on-device. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Oh I assumed the actual AI stuff was all off-device, because of the 'Private Cloud Compute' things they talked about.

I kind of assumed that any of the large language model / image generation / 'smart' Siri responses will be kicked out to an Apple server farm. While all the normal stuff that Siri already did like setting alarms / telling you the weather is / and things like dictation will still be on-device.

I guess we'll know quite how smart the phone soon is by disabling data connections and seeing what it can still do.
 
Last edited:
This is the model I've been waiting for. I had the original and the 2020. It's the perfect phone for bicycling, since it fits sideways in a jersey pocket, and won't fall out when hitting a bump, like a larger phone. And guess what? Yep, it makes phone calls just as well as any other iPhone! The camera is just fine for taking photos no one will ever look at again after you send them to your friends and family. $ave hundred$!
 
Since the SE4 is rumoured to be based on the iPhone 14, I don't see the iPhone 14 staying in the lineup once the SE4 arrives. I think we will see some kind of shakeup of the lineup, rather than direct replacements down the line, but I don't have a good guess at how it will look. But, guessing that new products will be more expensive than we hope, is usually accurate. I'm guessing the SE4 will not be as cheap as the current SE.

It may be that the lineup won't fully make sense until next fall when the rumoured 17 Air shows up. It seems reasonable that adding that phone also requires some sort of modification to the lineup logic.
They actually might remove all old models from sale... like you say, it would cause all kinds of issues.
It's been said (rumored) numerous times that the iPhone SE 4 will be priced higher than the current SE's $429 starting price.

I still have my doubts that the SE 4 will be able to run AI. AI should be the differentiator and selling point of the flagship line up (iPhone 16 series) to get people to buy them. This would also let Apple keep the iPhone 14 and/or 15 in the line up for those who don't want/care about AI (I don't).

Reasons for people to buy an iPhone 14 or 15 over an SE 4 would be for things like an extra camera lens and stronger zoom, MagSafe, higher storage capacity (up to 512GB), higher resolution and brighter display, higher capacity battery, etc.
 
I would be surprised if the base Macbook does not goes go to at least 12gb of memory. I cannot image it will have the same amount of memory as the iPhone SE, with both being announced around the same time early next year.
If the base M4 iPad Pro has 8GB memory then a base M4 MacBook Air and Pro can come with 8GB memory like they currently do.

The 256GB and 512GB ‌iPad Pro‌ models are equipped with 8GB RAM, while the 1TB and 2TB models have 16GB RAM. Both models offer 120GB/s memory bandwidth.

The M4 chips in the different storage tiers also vary, with the 256/512GB models offering a 9-core CPU and the 1TB/2TB models equipped with a 10-core CPU. Both models have 10-core GPUs and a 16-core Neural Engine.
 
Who is the regular iPhone for these days? if the rumours are true then the next SEE will only be lacking the following
  • Dynamic island (will use the iPhone 14 notch)
  • Brighter display (800 nit typical vs 1000 nit typical for the iPhone 15)
  • Wide angle camera (will likely use single camera)
  • 48 MP sensor (will likely use 12 MP sensor from iPhone 14)
  • 64 GB (vs 128 GB on regular iPhone)
Are these nice to have and would you want them? Yes. Would you pay $300 for them (assuming an SE price of $499)? maybe not...
 
  • Like
Reactions: GZR
They have to screw up this product somehow, otherwise it will cannibalize other iPhone models.
Otherwise it will probably be the very first iPhone I buy.

I'm guessing Apple has someone specifically in charge of product differentiation.

At this stage, they have this down to a science where every minute 'feature' can added or removed to boost or lower the value of a particular model.
 
This is a bit tongue in cheek, but I thought they were touting how they were able to get Apple Intelligence working on low RAM machines? This is the same amount of RAM that their Pro line of Macs includes, so it seems like that comment may have been a bit inaccurate?
8 GB of RAM is a "low RAM machine' :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: UliBaer
Having 8GB as a requirement for running AI is not the same as AI taking up 8GB of RAM. Clearly, Apple believes that the product needs 8GB to run AI together with whatever else it needs to run.

I do think we will see a spec bump of the base Macbooks soon, however I wouldn't put it past Apple to move to 12 GB and not 16.
The moment Apple releases the 12 GB RAM M4/M5 Air is the moment I will seriously consider upgrading from my Lenovo.
 
Kinda tired of all the rumors around this phone 3 years of reports and no pics of the actual phone has been seen 😂🤣
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.