Isn't this about the place some clueless idiot parrots the phrase: "Competition is good," even though it has nothing to do with the subject?
Glad I'm not the only one that's sick of hearing that.
Isn't this about the place some clueless idiot parrots the phrase: "Competition is good," even though it has nothing to do with the subject?
You guys are being really unfair towards Apple.
Listen to me for a minute here:
1. I read that this security hole has existed on EVERY version of the iPhone software to date.
2. Nothing has happened since then... why should Apple have to rush the iPhone development to fix this?
3. If this one dude had just told Apple about it and shut up, Apple would have fixed it with 3.1 and nobody else would have known.
4. Now, everyone at this Black Hat thing is going to know how to execute this hack and Apple will probably be FORCED to release an unfinished update. Why would you want that?
I just think it's very crappy to only give Apple a month to fix something that has been there for 2 years already. What a jerk.
As fast as AT&T seems to be able to move, ... they'd have it figured out by December.![]()
This jerk has just unleashed a thousand hackers bent on attacking all those people who don't update their devices quick enough.
Clearly they've been given enough time to fix it. Clearly they aren't going to unless pressure is placed on them. The only way to put pressure on them is to publish the details of the threat. If they just said "hey apple, we're not going to publish this because, well, we're nice guys." Then what more incentive do they have to fix it quickly?
Can you share the facts on which you based that statement? AFAIK, the only fact known is "Charlie Miller told Apple about this 30 days ago". I've seen nobody comment publicly on how big of an issue this is to patch, nor how long it takes to turn around an iPhone security patch in general ... identifying, coding, testing, piloting, and then full world-wide distribution.
Anybody know if this is *already* fixed in 3.1?
If Mr. Miller releases this info today, and our iPhones start getting hijacked, could Mr. Miller and Mr. Mulliner be sued for damages in a Class Action lawsuit by Apple, and all users affected.
Are there any Real Lawyers in this Forum that could answer this?
It happens all the time. Security people find holes, report it to the vendor, and they're given ample time to fix it. Apple are being slack, it's up to them to fix it, and quickly.
Clearly, Apple (and by extension, their partner ATT) was warned; but Mr. Miller may be yelling "Fire" in a theater.
Geez: rule #1: never trust outside input, period. Edit it before using it.
I don't think a month (or so) is really enough time to patch and test an OS at this level. Given the level of control the intrusion implies, I would suspect that it's a fairly low-level OS issue.
The only truth to that statement is that it's your opinion, unless you're basing it on some facts that nobody else here is aware of (in regards to the SMS issue).The truth is that Apple have not yet learnt the lesson that MS had to learn so bluntly 10 years ago: you can't release patches when it is convenient to you. Security fixes need to be pushed with as much urgency is as humanly possible.
I wonder how easy it is for hackers to send a SMS message over a network and not be detected.If this hack really is released today it will create huge problems for thousands (more?) of people when hundreds of greedy little nothing-better-to-do-with-my-life hackers lay their filthy paws on it.![]()
I know a lot of people who don't upgrade their iPhone for weeks after an update, much less on the day-of. If this hack really is released today it will create huge problems for thousands (more?) of people when hundreds of greedy little nothing-better-to-do-with-my-life hackers lay their filthy paws on it.![]()
I think that was in regards to Apple's push notification messages, not SMS.I'm pretty sure that I read on another post, a little while back, that some kind of authentication key was generated by Apples servers when an SMS message was sent. To make sure that it was legit. So, if that is the case, can't Apple fix this with filters on thier end?
I wonder how easy it is for hackers to send a SMS message over a network and not be detected.
On every text message I've received with AT&T, it's always shown the phone number that sent it, so it's not as simple as just randomly sending a text message to every phone number in the world, hoping you get an iPhone on the other end?