Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If I have learned one thing on these forums since joining, it would be that everyone here thinks they know how to run Apple better than its currently being run.

When it comes to being proactive about security, Apple *could* take a few lessons.
 
Sometimes I just love MacRumors; lets blame the people responsible for uncovering a huge security threat and giving Apple ample time to fix it. For all of you talking about how long it would take to implement such a fix, you have likely never worked in the software industry -- especially not when millions of customers could potentially be affected. When a security threat is revealed, you fix it quickly -- you even take resources off other projects if need be.

Some of the Apple fanboy excuses I've seen in this thread are truly laughable: it's July so they are on vacation? Are you ****ing kidding me? Or that the threat has been around for two years so to expect Apple to fix it in one month is absurd? This is simply illogical; first of all, the length of time the bug has existed, uncovered, is irrelevant to the length of time it would take to fix such a bug; and secondly, it is a benefit to all of us iPhone owners that the threat wasn't found by someone with malicious intent, but instead was found by people who notified Apple -- pull your heads of of the sand. And lastly, they're are doing this as a publicity stunt? Really?

I say more power to the Black Hat community. If they know how to do it, someone else will figure it out soon enough anyway, whether they go public or not.
 
Mr. Dweller, I think if you look at most of the posts you'll find that almost everyone thinks Apple is being stupid here. Please don't over generalize as it makes you look stupid too.

Don't know if this has been posted yet, so...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10299378-245.html?tag=TOCmoreStories.0

Looks like it works.

Thankfully, it seems they've only demonstrated the ability to crash the phone so far. Would be nice if they'd stop doing the "you could" junk on cnet without telling us exactly how likely it is for someone to say, release a virus using this tomorrow.
 
Thankfully, it seems they've only demonstrated the ability to crash the phone so far. Would be nice if they'd stop doing the "you could" junk on cnet without telling us exactly how likely it is for someone to say, release a virus using this tomorrow.

Given Miller's past record and the fact that they can crash the phone I'm going to bet they can also insert the worm. We'll see later but this is uncomfortable reading.
 
Anyone that has done some professional programming knows that such bugs are priority no.1, having 6 weeks to fix such a security hole is plenty time for such a big company. This is probably some kind of buffer/stack overflow attack and as such most of the times it's rather easy to fix especially if the guy told them how to exploit the hole (which means he knows exactly where the problem is). What I don't understand is why some people have to defend apple so hardcore as if they are themselves the iphone os programmers...
 
Seems like Apple needs to move a little quicker than they want on security fixes. M$ learned their lessons on this years ago. It's a shame Apple has to learn it this way ... blind hatred toward Redmond isn't helping your iPhone customers any.
 
Technologizer has a different spin on it:

http://technologizer.com/2009/07/30/your-phone-is-probably-vulnerable-to-malicious-text-messages/

Virtually all GSM phones (such as Apple’s iPhone) and GSM wireless operators (such as AT&T and T-Mobile) on the planet appear to be vulnerable to attacks using specially crafted SMS text messages discovered by security researchers Zane Lackey and Luis Miras.

So exactly how large is the scope of this vulnerability? Virtually all GSM phones?!?
 
What I don't understand is why some people have to defend apple so hardcore as if they are themselves the iphone os programmers...
For the exact same reason that people like you keep insisting that a month is adequate time for Apple to have identified the problem, developed a solution, regression tested it on all of the different versions of iPhone hardware/software, and get their (and every carrier that supports the iPhone) support folks prepped to help customers.
 
agreed. i'm generally against people publicizing hacks others can then take advantage of, but if apple has known about this for a month or more, it needs to happen so they'll finally fix it. it's ridiculous for apple to not have patched this hole yet.

I agree - I would hope something that is potentially this damaging to their whole phone ecosystem would be fixed a little faster!
 
For the exact same reason that people like you keep insisting that a month is adequate time for Apple to have identified the problem, developed a solution, regression tested it on all of the different versions of iPhone hardware, and get their (and every carrier that supports the iPhone) support folks prepped to help customers.

Why not? MS are expected to do the same and do with Windows.
 
The fanboyism is strong in this thread.
This is a priority ONE security hole.
They we're told about it - and have done nothing about it so far.
So are you all saying that Apple should take its sweet time to fix such a huge security hole?!?
If this was Microsoft - I'm sure you all would be changing your tunes.

I'm no fanboy. I have, however, spent 20+ years in the industry, working for both hardware and software companies. Even if this was a priority 0 situation, there is only so much you can do. Nobody can work miracles, and nobody can plan for every contingency. Not Apple, not Microsoft, nobody.

It's not being an apologist, it's being a realist. Am I annoyed that this problem exists? Yes. Is it the end of my life? No. Given that my phone could be used for a 911 call, I would rather it was fixed right than done in a half-assed manner. But, I could just as easily forget to charge it and not have it work when I needed to make that call. Then the onus would be on me.

But, in the end, nothing is flawless. Bad things happen. We survived before cell phones, before computers, and before many other wonderful things that make our lives safer and more enjoyable. But, they are as flawed as we are, and so we cope.

I'm not trying to wax philosophical, I just think that in general people get too wrapped up in issues like this, and "security researchers" often have the easy task - it is much easier to find a flaw than it usually is to fix it.
 
What I don't understand is why some people have to defend apple so hardcore as if they are themselves the iphone os programmers...

Take your pick... Stockholm Syndrome, or just standard cult behavior.

thogscave said:
I'm not trying to wax philosophical, I just think that in general people get too wrapped up in issues like this, and "security researchers" often have the easy task - it is much easier to find a flaw than it usually is to fix it.
Actually, it is easier to fix the flaw than it is to find them. Finding flaws is generally the hard part. (Excepting the typical Microsoft behavior in the previous decade of creating 'standards' that required inherently stupid behavior.)

aristrobrat said:
For the exact same reason that people like you keep insisting that a month is adequate time for Apple to have identified the problem, developed a solution, regression tested it on all of the different versions of iPhone hardware/software, and get their (and every carrier that supports the iPhone) support folks prepped to help customers.
When the Microsoft WMF flaw hit right after patch Tuesday(around 1/1/2006), MS fans raved that there was no way MS could be expected to rush out a patch. In the end, MS did rush out a patch about 10 days later. And it turned out the datestamp on the new files was one day after the initial discovery. This was in a complex part of Windows (GDI API) that actually had the possibility of breaking code. But since a big bug is a big bug, there is actually very little chance of regression problems. In the case of this iPhone bug(which appears to just be a buffer overflow), the chances are near zero. If it is a control-message bug, then it becomes similar to the Windows WMF flaw, and you block out what is presumably 'undocumented' functionality.
 
Take your pick... Stockholm Syndrome, or just standard cult behavior.

Actually, it is easier to fix the flaw than it is to find them. Finding flaws is generally the hard part. (Excepting the typical Microsoft behavior in the previous decade of creating 'standards' that required inherently stupid behavior.)

Exactly... finding that overflowing an unchecked variable you can load stuff into the stack and actually implementing a check on said variable is a total different difficulty level. I'm not saying it's something so simple (it could be) but stil 6 weeks are probably enough.

Oh and for the guy that said they have to check the different software and hardware: There are 3(!) hardware versions of the iPhone, the OS and the thousands of apps which Apple isn't going to test every single one of them for compatibility anyways. With that logic it should take M$ about 10 years to fix a flaw since it has to test a billion of different hardware configurations and another 10 billion apps...
 
In the case of this iPhone bug(which appears to just be a buffer overflow), the chances are near zero. If it is a control-message bug, then it becomes similar to the Windows WMF flaw, and you block out what is presumably 'undocumented' functionality.
So this bug is being reported as affecting virtually every GSM phone, so does that still make it sound like a buffer-overflow to you?
 
So this bug is being reported as affecting virtually every GSM phone, so does that still make it sound like a buffer-overflow to you?

If that is true, then no, it does not sound like a buffer overflow. It would probably be a control message validation. But since it is reported to corrupt memory, something is going wrong somewhere in a way that is obviously not part of any expected operation.
 
Clearly they've been given enough time to fix it. Clearly they aren't going to unless pressure is placed on them. The only way to put pressure on them is to publish the details of the threat. If they just said "hey apple, we're not going to publish this because, well, we're nice guys." Then what more incentive do they have to fix it quickly?

How are you so sure that one month was enough time to fix this problem, it may be harder then you think. What if they have been working on this really hard for the past month. Aren't you assuming too much information about Apple's work tasks? Seriously!
 
The fanboyism is strong in this thread.

This is a priority ONE security hole.

They we're told about it - and have done nothing about it so far.

So are you all saying that Apple should take its sweet time to fix such a huge security hole?!?

If this was Microsoft - I'm sure you all would be changing your tunes.

I am GLAD that they went public with this. What would happen if they didn't go public with this, and then a hacker actually implemented it? I bet you'd see a fix within days.

So many people on here keep claiming Apple has done nothing, are you an Apple employee have you seen Apple's work task, if not how do you know if they have done nothing. They could have been working on this for a month, can you actually prove otherwise?
Not being a fan-boy just pointing out that a lot of people are making some ridiculous claims here, and keep getting angry at Apple, I'm guessing its because they are now scared for their iPhone.
 
For the exact same reason that people like you keep insisting that a month is adequate time for Apple to have identified the problem, developed a solution, regression tested it on all of the different versions of iPhone hardware/software, and get their (and every carrier that supports the iPhone) support folks prepped to help customers.

such things aren't a snap of the fingers to fix. you have to make sure you don't break something else in the process.
Google already patched Android, so both of your arguments for Apple's lack of attention to the matter fails.

How are you so sure that one month was enough time to fix this problem, it may be harder then you think. What if they have been working on this really hard for the past month. Aren't you assuming too much information about Apple's work tasks? Seriously!
It was actually 6 weeks ago, but who's really counting... certainly not Apple.


The hole they found in Windows Mobile was only discovered a few days ago and they have yet to notify Microsoft of the details. I expect Microsoft will have a patch out pretty quick. They've already proven they can code, test and deploy patches pretty quickly.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.