Oh, geez, here we go.... The Jokers on here have started.
https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=8190677#post8190677
https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=8190677#post8190677
I know companies can register those types of codes (American Idol, Bank of America, etc), but I don't know if a regular person can spoof something like that.But, don't some of your SMS messages (like the ones from AT&T) just have a Code instead of a Phone Number? Like when you send a message to 543542, etc...
The fanboyism is strong in this thread.
This is a priority ONE security hole.
They we're told about it - and have done nothing about it so far.
So are you all saying that Apple should take its sweet time to fix such a huge security hole?!?
If this was Microsoft - I'm sure you all would be changing your tunes.
I am GLAD that they went public with this. What would happen if they didn't go public with this, and then a hacker actually implemented it? I bet you'd see a fix within days.
Are you expecting a step by step tutorial on how to implement this attack?
You all who? Who here (except for TheSpazz) thinks Apple should take its sweet time?So are you all saying that Apple should take its sweet time to fix such a huge security hole?!?
The only truth to that statement is that it's your opinion, unless you're basing it on some facts that nobody else here is aware of (in regards to the SMS issue).
Now they say to turn off your phone if you get a sms with nothing but a sqaure box, for how long am I suppose to leave it off. Anyone know more on that?
On the Internet, a month is an eternity. It doesn't matter how long a bug has gone undiscovered. A month is the maximum time between Microsoft patch days, and they have still been forced to do unscheduled emergency patch releases many times.I just think it's very crappy to only give Apple a month to fix something that has been there for 2 years already. What a jerk.
...why would they publish this information? I'm not absolving apple of blame here, but come on. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean it's not reckless to use it in a case like this.
I wonder how easy it is for hackers to send a SMS message over a network and not be detected.
On every text message I've received with AT&T, it's always shown the phone number that sent it, so it's not as simple as just randomly sending a text message to every phone number in the world, hoping you get an iPhone on the other end?
It wouldn't be a problem if the guy just told Apple and shut up about it. If he was the only one that knew about the hole, then everyone would be fine.
How do you remove the SMS application from your iPhone anyways? I don't want it at all, I've got so many free solutions (IE, Skype, AIM, Facebook... hell, even eMail,) why would I ever want to pay for SMS when I've got unlimited data?
I never use SMS anyways... I've pushed it off to a back home screen... am I vulnerable anyways?
That's exactly my point. I don't have enough information about this issue to base an opinion on if Apple is moving on it fast enough or not.What do you base *your* opinion on?
It wouldn't be a problem if the guy just told Apple and shut up about it. If he was the only one that knew about the hole, then everyone would be fine.
That is Apple's problem. They need to join the 1990s and start doing binary patch updates, instead of forcing full re-downloads of an entire program for every small change. Google Chrome does it, Firefox does it, Microsoft does it, anybody who uses RTPatch does it, there are open source programs that do it. APPLE, DO IT!kingtj said:Then you're going to push that big update out to everyone's iTunes, costing Apple a load of server bandwidth and users a big inconvenience (plus the inevitable flash updates that go wrong, causing bricked phones and support calls).
Good. As an IT professional one of my biggest headaches is dealing with users that don't keep their systems up to date. Perhaps a looming threat to their precious iPhones will get them to realize that you need to update software and devices frequently and quickly.
At one point, the dot security releases were simple 10MB downloads. When did that ever change?That is Apple's problem. They need to join the 1990s and start doing binary patch updates, instead of forcing full re-downloads of an entire program for every small change. Google Chrome does it, Firefox does it, Microsoft does it, anybody who uses RTPatch does it, there are open source programs that do it. APPLE, DO IT!
That's exactly my point. I don't have enough information about this issue to base an opinion on if Apple is moving on it fast enough or not.
How do you know they've done nothing about it? And for that matter, how do you know they were told?They we're told about it - and have done nothing about it so far.