I’ve got 4 around the house/car and three are wrapped in electrical tape. You must not charge or move them at all. They are flimsy.I've never seen a lightning connector wear out. At the worst it needs an occasional cleaning.
I’ve got 4 around the house/car and three are wrapped in electrical tape. You must not charge or move them at all. They are flimsy.I've never seen a lightning connector wear out. At the worst it needs an occasional cleaning.
no, compared to the overall quarterly revenue, it's peanuts.Apple gets $3.00 per chip that is embedded in each MFi-certified cable or port. That’s not peanuts.
Ok, I have seen the 0.5% number mentioned here. How much do you spend on third-party stuff with a Lightning port? I'd be surprised if that is even 10% of what people spend on iPhones. The latter have a gross margin of about 35%. If Apple earns 100 billion dollars from iPhones that is 35 billion dollars in gross margin. With a third-party Lightning market of 10%, ie, 10 billion dollars, from which Apple gets 0.5%, that is 50 million dollars. In comparison to 35 billion, 50 million is a rounding error.It adds up to quite a bit. Is it a double digit percentage? Maybe not. Does it pull in probably millions per year? Wouldn’t be surprised. Am I interested in further discussing this with people who just vote apple instead of voting for what’s best for the industry and customers? Not in the slightest.
that sucks.
The only reason this is being done over the standardized USB C is because APPLE wants to screw its own customers on the high prices of Lightning Cables.
Do you go through a lot of Lightning cables or do you go through a lot of Apple-branded Lightning cables? Point being, in my experience it is the cable part that breaks, in my mind, too easily on Apple Lightning cables, not the plug part. In other words, using a higher quality cable material (eg, a braided one), Lightning cables can last very long.I had the exact opposite experience. I go through those cables a lot.
Ok, how many third-party products with a Lightning port have I bought over the years? Two, that is $6 from my purchases, compared to thousands of dollars I've spend on iPhones and iPads over the years.Apple gets $3.00 per chip that is embedded in each MFi-certified cable or port. That’s not peanuts.
I’ve got 4 around the house/car and three are wrapped in electrical tape. You must not charge or move them at all. They are flimsy.
I wonder if magsafe becomes a replacement for the Smart Connector. Apple goes back to the striped apple logo where the strips are individual electrical contactsWeird. USB-C is used in some form on most of their products. A portless model would be super super slow for those who transfer a lot of data over a cable now.
I had the exact opposite experience. I go through those cables a lot.
I know I'll catch flak for saying this, but...
I'm glad. The lightning connector is a lot more durable than USB-C. I honestly think that this is why Apple keeps using it in their highest volume products.
We tend to plug and unplug our phones a lot to charge them, sometimes on a daily basis.
I've seen Macbooks with USB-C where the socket has worn out to such an extent the plug will fall out if you turn it sideways.
I've never seen a lightning connector wear out. At the worst it needs an occasional cleaning.
Yes, it's annoying to have a different connector than my Android friends but honestly, it's not a big deal. I almost always have a cable in my car I can use in an emergency.
And the AirPods and Beats ones break the Bluetooth standard to get around its flaws.The other explanation as to why Apple removed the 3.5mm headphone jack.
For people who want ear/headphones, this forces them to either
(1) buy wired ear/headphones with lightning connector from Apple or MFi certified ones, or
(2) buy wireless earphones... most of which will likely be a variant of Apple's AirPods or something from their Beats line.
In either case, Apple win$.
![]()
I agree, it sucks. I don't use Bluetooth. Just never expected a new car's tech not to become outdated quickly. I'm perfectly content with only connecting audio to my car; idk what else I'd want. Even wired CarPlay was annoying whenever I tried it, too complicated for something that's 99% just serving as an aux + charging port.I get that. But another way for companies to think about it (and especially if they claim to be "all-that" about the environment) is to prolong the usefulness of their products. When anytime you want to connect to any devise to play audio from your phone, you need bluetooth in the signal path (and the associated hassles of disconnecting other devices from that BT device) it's not the modern seamless experience everyone imagines. A radio transmitter, hmm … been there, done that. Doesn't pair with with Apple Car Play.
It's not just cable sales but control. Apple controls a proprietary standard that billions of people use. They won't give that up even if USB-C is a lot better, which it is.If USB-C was really such a good feature, they wouldn’t doubt about it. Profit of one iPhone is bigger than 20 cables (additional cables, since one is already included). It’s like people saying that Apple doesn’t make an iPad with macOS because it would eat Mac sales: what would Apple like better than having a successful Tablet-PC mix! The real reason in both cases is that they have a lot of downsides.
So…Why? The only reasons you can't plug your phone into a USB-C dock and have a full fledged computer experience are:
1) There is no USB type C port on the iPhone
I tried Apple Car Play on a rental car once and thought was way too distracting and cumbersome, but now that I have the latest version in my own car, I've really come to like it.I agree, it sucks. I don't use Bluetooth. Just never expected a new car's tech not to become outdated quickly. I'm perfectly content with only connecting audio to my car; idk what else I'd want. Even wired CarPlay was annoying whenever I tried it, too complicated for something that's 99% just serving as an aux + charging port.
Lightening is rubbish. I have black on contacts on all my connectors and cables. Sometimes I have flip them over to get am connection. Most are Apple products. When will we get USB-C which is much more robust!Lightning is unparalleled when it comes for ruggedness. And I would bet it has an even wider adoption than USB-C. It would not be wise to change to another standard when the future for the iPhone clearly is portless.
I mean, you don't have to use a dock. The iPad already supports all of the functionality describes, that doesn't force people to stop using them as tablets.So…
Instead of simply grabbing my iPhone at home to type up a message while I am doing whatever I am doing at my then current location, I am going to walk to my office, hook it up to a docking station, pair it up with a keyboard & mouse, launch the Messages app and send my message there. Oh wait, I will also have to return to the office to read the response.
Even better: I will have to worry about how ALL apps are scaled when the iPhone is hooked up to a 4K monitor via a docking station and I will also ensure that I complain that none of my streaming apps are working when the iPhone is docked due to copyright restrictions.
Let’s make the change to USB-C overnight. Makes total sense. While we are at it, let’s also throw an SD card slot in there AND manufacture a Magsafe external HDD wallet for the iPhone because I have heard magnets and external storages go great hand to hand. I am fully on board, anyone else with me on this?!
Send me a link please. I can't buy them for under about $6.99 in my area, for the absolute cheapest garbage.A cable comes in the box. It costs you zero. I'm sorry you find that burdensome. BTW, a cable can be purchased at Walmart for $2.99.