Complaints by Apple are current and accurate. A LEGISLATION for a port is a bad idea and blocks progress on the next big thing. microUSB was a memorandum of understanding which meant that including an adapter in box was sufficient for anyone delivering devices to the EU. That option DOES NOT EXIST with USB-C.The timing of the regulation and complaints by Apple about said regulation says otherwise.
Also, the micro-USB regulation was equally effective for its time, eliminating dozens of proprietary chargers. It was a nightmare back then, before that regulation. As much as I hated micro-USB as a connector, that was also an excellent piece of regulation, and successfully solved a significant problem.
And the successive regulations to enforce USB-C have been equally effective. Despite baseless worries that we’d be stuck with micro-USB forever back then, and current similar (and similarly baseless) complaints about being stuck with USB-C forever now.
The timing of the legislation actually supports my idea as we all know Apple works on iPhones YEARS in advance. There is literally no way that starting working on a USB-C iPhone in 2022 would lead to a USB-C iPhone in 2023. They’d have to have the SoC, with its USB-C compatible features, nailed down by at least 2019 or 2020 to allow time for testing, iterating, production and ready for manufacture. All of that indicates an Apple that was working to meet their self imposed goal of 10 years to put the port they had been working with the industry on over that time.
The EU is well known for their regulations having “unintended consequences” and this will play out over the coming years as no one can ship a device that charges via a wire without having USB-C on it even if a better solution could be created.