I ended up doing the exact same thing on my Toyota Yaris Cross.Confirming on Rav4. Carplay button on car’s screen didn’t open carplay.
Had to open carplay settings on the phone, go into the car’s profile. Then in the Toyota settings had to disconnect/reconnect bluetooth to my phone. That fixed it.
The Mazda CX-30 does not support CarPlay in the instrument cluster. I have one. I wish it did, but I haven’t had any issues either way.The instrument cluster bugs have been reported across numerous vehicle models including the 2025 Honda Civic Hybrid, 2025 Mazda CX-30, various 2024 Honda models, multiple Volkswagen vehicles, the 2023 Audi S3, and the 2023 Nissan Frontier.
any individual software quality incident by itself is proof of nothing, but taken together they paint a concerning picture of steadily declining software quality at Apple
what we can debate over is what the cause of all this is:
- Is it an increased focus on revenue and profit? ("the Tim Apple" crowd)
- Is it the result Apple's rapid head count growth and the ensuing complexity of communication and coordination?
- Is it the growing complexity of software over time?
- Is it the lack of a singular focus at the top? ("everything would be different if Steve were alive")
My hypothesis is that it's a combination of all four.
It's also why I am pessimistic about Apple's ability to fix this to any significant degree.
I don't think 4 is much of a concern, it's been more than a decade, and things didn't immediately fall apart when he departed, nor did some of his grandiose ideas pan out. I'm specifically thinking of the "We've cracked the TV market," which was essentially just another set-top box.any individual software quality incident by itself is proof of nothing, but taken together they paint a concerning picture of steadily declining software quality at Apple
what we can debate over is what the cause of all this is:
- Is it an increased focus on revenue and profit? ("the Tim Apple" crowd)
- Is it the result Apple's rapid head count growth and the ensuing complexity of communication and coordination?
- Is it the growing complexity of software over time?
- Is it the lack of a singular focus at the top? ("everything would be different if Steve were alive")
My hypothesis is that it's a combination of all four.
It's also why I am pessimistic about Apple's ability to fix this to any significant degree.
People call for Tim's head because of how much he is paid to get rid of people like Craig when they underperform. He just cashed in 1/3rd of a previous years vested stock options which is more than most of us will see in our entire lifetime. That seems undeserved when we have issues like this.I don't quite understand why Craig Federighi's responsibility is always overlooked.
He's the head of all software. Basically all complaints about Apple are software related.
Everyone always calls for Tim's head, but why doesn't anyone ever ask if it's time for Craig to spend more time with his money?
I guess as CEO everything is ultimately his fault / credit. So maybe it's just that he's not managing his people well. But the upper echelon seems kind of frozen in time. Unless they're squashing some (real or potential) coup attempt as seemed to be the case with Forstall, it seems like anyone that was a lieutenant to Steve is untouchable.
any individual software quality incident by itself is proof of nothing, but taken together they paint a concerning picture of steadily declining software quality at Apple
what we can debate over is what the cause of all this is:
- Is it an increased focus on revenue and profit? ("the Tim Apple" crowd)
- Is it the result Apple's rapid head count growth and the ensuing complexity of communication and coordination?
- Is it the growing complexity of software over time?
- Is it the lack of a singular focus at the top? ("everything would be different if Steve were alive")
My hypothesis is that it's a combination of all four.
It's also why I am pessimistic about Apple's ability to fix this to any significant degree.
Each new feature and functionality is added into an extremely complex web of interdependencies.
It's natural and often inevitable that things break.
The problem seems to be more on the QA side which should catch these before they are released into the wild.
A debate? Really? No, it's just a bug. A mistake. Expecting 100% perfection 100% of the time when humans are involved is unrealistic.
Life goes on. Planet Earth will continue to rotate into the Sun's rays tomorrow. No worries.
It may have something to do with the millions of different iPhones and the millions of different of cars.any individual software quality incident by itself is proof of nothing, but taken together they paint a concerning picture of steadily declining software quality at Apple
what we can debate over is what the cause of all this is:
- Is it an increased focus on revenue and profit? ("the Tim Apple" crowd)
- Is it the result Apple's rapid head count growth and the ensuing complexity of communication and coordination?
- Is it the growing complexity of software over time?
- Is it the lack of a singular focus at the top? ("everything would be different if Steve were alive")
My hypothesis is that it's a combination of all four.
It's also why I am pessimistic about Apple's ability to fix this to any significant degree.
There aren’t millions of different iPhone configurations and millions of different car entertainment system configurations. A corporation the size of Apple can easily handle testing and verification across the vast majority of actual permutations. But it won’t happen if software quality and user experience are not really priorities in the corporate culture, especially at top management.It may have something to do with the millions of different iPhones and the millions of different of cars.