no matter how you slice it, the iPhone camera is pretty horrible at times.
its true - i was hoping they'd at least up the megapixels by now if not zoom
no matter how you slice it, the iPhone camera is pretty horrible at times.
Isn't it a bad tradesman who blames his tools......
I have an nikon D70 a mere 6 mp and have successfully enlarged up to 46inches no worries
My iphones meesly 2 mp camera is far superior to my ex nokia 6121 classic total crud...and on a par with my nokia 6280
Bottom line it a phone it gives you adequate photos as an extra me thinks too many people want more for nothing why buy the dam thing if the camera is lousy go get one of those dam N95/96 things or others....
My 5 cents worth
Cheers![]()
From memory, over the years I've owned (with cameras) the Sony Ericsson T68i, Orange SPV E100, SPV E200, Nokia 6600, SE K700i, Nokia 6230, SE K750i, HTC TYTN, SE K800i, SE P990i, Nokia N91, HTC Arthemis, Nokia N95 and the iPhone 3G. There may have been a few more, but I can't remember them all. Anyway, I can honestly say that the iPhone takes the worst pictures out of all of those phones except for the T68i, but even that had some options in the camera app for scene setup, lighting, etc. The E100 ran WinMo 2002, so that tells you how old some of those cameras were and WinMo are renowned for rubbish cameras.
Consider that a 20% thicker (and heavier) shell might decrease iPhone sales by more than a better camera would increase them. Plus a camera with a better lens would almost certainly reduce profits. So why would Apple want to do this?
.
That's what i did, i got rid of my iPhone for a N95 8GB Black, never looked back!! the camera quality of the N95 is a million miles away from the iPhone's, and Video recording is incredible on this thing, the microphones on the N95 record some fantastic audio.
Phazer said:That isn't really relevant - there are other reasons for that phone's form factor. If you disassemble a SE C905 it's camera assembly would fit quite happily wihin the iPhone's case. Even with the Flash, with a bit of clever motherboard rejigging.
Heck, if you want a good camera, buy an actual camera! You can get 12MP ones for around £100 these days, that's about twice as many pixels as the best camera phone to date. I seriously hate it when people complain about the iPhone camera, it's not there for taking fantastic pictures, just quick little fun ones.
I dont understand this logic,
should Apple not do any improvements to get GPS better, If people need this facility then buy a sat nav
perhaps the best thing is not to make any more changes to the phone and just let people move to standalone bits of kit
want a better camera, buy a camera
want something changed with music/video, buy an iPod
want maps/gps improvements, buy a sat nav
I think he means now. People who complain about the camera now.
For example --
I imagine it's akin to people saying (and people have actually said this) "iPhone sucks as a video player! It only has 16 (or 8) gigs on on it!". Naturally the iPhone capacity will increase in time, but some people feel they need EVERY episode of some nerdy TV show with them AT ALL TIMES. For these people, they need something other than the iPhone, even though the iPhone is a fantastic video player, IMO.
The camera will keep getting better ... and people will just keep on complaining![]()
I just fail to see why some people have an objection to Apple making a slightly better camera, surely it would benefit all
I imagine the camera will see a boost in the next version.
That makes the most sense so far in this thread.
Apple left room to improve a few secondary features in some future product cycle, and thus encourage a slightly higher percentage of customers (more than walked away from the current product because of the tiny camera lens) to upgrade, if/when that eventually ships.
.