Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
On my recent trek around the right half of the US, I saw a ton of iPhones everywhere. I easily saw more iPhones in the last week than all the iPods I ever saw combined.

Of course, the observation is skewed: I notice iPhones. I don't notice Blackberries. People tend to hold the iPhone more than the iPod, or at the very least, use them more frequently than the iPod.

(Similarly, seems like most notebooks in the airport were a PB/MBP)
 
Wow . . . my maths-brain is tingling.

So . . . Apple at 28%

And this is more than Palm at 9% and Windows [other] at 21%???

9+21 = 30 . . . ?

And, stacking the odds in the favour of Apple . . .

8.49999 (8.5) + 20.49999 (20.5) = 29, which is still higher than the maximum Apple could have using any kind of rounding (28.49999 = 28.5%)

Apple appears to NOT have a higher share of the market than Palm and Windows, does it not?
 
Yes, and Motorola has to quit the market with 41m sold! Long way to go for Apple.

But weren't most of Motorola's offerings cheap phones that are given away as free or low-cost to new customers? The numbers are meaningless if Motorola wasn't actually earning anything from it. A company like Apple could conceivably sell fewer phones and earn more from it than someone like Motorola--exactly what they do in the computer market, come to think of it.
 
Handset Manufacturers, market stats Q4 2007
According to market watcher Strategy Analytics these are the results Q4 2007:
Nokia sold a staggering 133.5m mobiles
Samsung 46.4m
Motorola 40.9m
Sony Ericsson 30.8m
LG 23.7m
Apple shifted 2.3m iPhones

Market share remains as follows:
Nokia 40.2% market share, the highest in its history
Samsung 14%
Motorola 12.3%
Sony Ericsson 9.3%
LG 7.1%
Apple 0.6%

Overall: 332m mobile phones shipped in Q4 2007
(source Strategy Analytics)




"Nokia sold a staggering 133.5m mobiles"


But

"Apple shifted 2.3m iPhones"

No bias there :rolleyes:
 
math brain

The statement does not include the word combined.

That's what you are looking at. The statement was that .28>.09 and .28>.21. Both of which are true.

It is not true (and not stated) that the iPhone marketshare is bigger than the combined marketshare of Palm and Windows Mobile device vendors.
 
But weren't most of Motorola's offerings cheap phones that are given away as free or low-cost to new customers? The numbers are meaningless if Motorola wasn't actually earning anything from it. A company like Apple could conceivably sell fewer phones and earn more from it than someone like Motorola--exactly what they do in the computer market, come to think of it.

Exactly. If the iPhone were free, or $50, then they would 'outsell' Motorolla pretty quick.
 
Are we talking OSX, meaning all versions? or just 10.5? If it is the whole series compared to vista, it might be actually close...
 
i Phone Market Share

Funny that Steve Ballmer said that the iphone would never get a significant share of the smart phone market April 07
 
The "researcher" either loves nokia, or has nokia stock... Reporting like that makes me mad :mad:

Well, ABI Research is not much better : "As Motorola continued to suffer from a weak device portfolio, Nokia sold 134 million handsets for a record 40 per cent share. Apple came in slightly below expectations, shipping 2.3 million units for a 0.6 per cent worldwide share."
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A93 Safari/419.3)

mohthom said:
Wow . . . my maths-brain is tingling.

So . . . Apple at 28%

And this is more than Palm at 9% and Windows [other] at 21%???

9+21 = 30 . . . ?

And, stacking the odds in the favour of Apple . . .

8.49999 (8.5) + 20.49999 (20.5) = 29, which is still higher than the maximum Apple could have using any kind of rounding (28.49999 = 28.5%)

Apple appears to NOT have a higher share of the market than Palm and Windows, does it not?

They were not saying Palm and Windows Mobile Devices combined. They were talking about all of the devices that use Windows Mobile combined make up 21%. So the comparison was 28% vs. 21%, stating that the iPhone is ahead. I initially thought the same thing.
 
Funny that Steve Ballmer said that the iphone would never get a significant share of the smart phone market April 07

Not by any stretch am I a fan of Steve Ballmer, but let's be fair. He said that back when the iPhone was more expensive and before a lot of the final details about the phone's quality and features were known. I think if the iPhone were still available for the original price without all the features and quality-enhancements that were made public at the last-minute, Ballmer's prediction would have pretty much been dead-on accurate.
 
I don't want to take anything away from Apple because this is a significant success for them, but originally they were talking in terms of simply gaining 1% of the overall cell phone market, not isolating numbers by looking at the smart phone market only. Where does this put them in terms of the overall cell phone market? I'm betting they're still under 1%.

Their goal was 1% of all sales during calendar year 2008.

They estimated 1 billion total market, meaning 1% would require selling 10 million during the year 2008. So far they seem on track to do that easily, they should make the 1% unless the total market is considerably higher than the billion estimated.

This is simply a different comparison, it doesn't mean they're shying away from the other one.

100 years?

Never say never. Especially when the flavors of windows seem to be flopping on anything but regular old PCs while handheld devices with OSX are taking off. I suspect before long all iPods will run OSX in addition to the aTV and additional devices down the road. It's a long shot, but I wouldn't completely rule it out. Of course, it's an odd comparison since you're comparing one generation of windows against all generations of OSX - vista will only be selling for a few years anyway. Looks like you're just looking at computers and ignoring phones and iPods running OSX?

Not by any stretch am I a fan of Steve Ballmer, but let's be fair. He said that back when the iPhone was more expensive and before a lot of the final details about the phone's quality and features were known. I think if the iPhone were still available for the original price without all the features and quality-enhancements that were made public at the last-minute, Ballmer's prediction would have pretty much been dead-on accurate.

What's not fair? He knew that prices would probably drop, and features added. He made a "never" prediction - knowing all the facts or not, that's pretty boneheaded.
 
Comparing Apple's market share to Nokia's is a joke. Apple doesn't even try to compete in the same space that Nokia does. Compare Apple to Nokia in the smartphone market and thats a better comparison.

Last I head Apple wanted to sell 10 million phones by the end of 2008 representing (at the time) 1% of the cell phone market. They were at 4 million last I heard.
 
Last I head Apple wanted to sell 10 million phones by the end of 2008 representing (at the time) 1% of the cell phone market. They were at 4 million last I heard.

Actually that's 10 million DURING 2008. They'll hit 10 million total way sooner than the end of the year.
 
On my recent trek around the right half of the US, I saw a ton of iPhones everywhere. I easily saw more iPhones in the last week than all the iPods I ever saw combined.

Of course, the observation is skewed: I notice iPhones. I don't notice Blackberries. People tend to hold the iPhone more than the iPod, or at the very least, use them more frequently than the iPod.

(Similarly, seems like most notebooks in the airport were a PB/MBP)

See any Zunes?
BTW, eat it Ballmer! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5oGaZIKYvo
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.